| Literature DB >> 29666767 |
Andrea González-Fernández1, Armando Sunny2, Javier Manjarrez1, Uri García-Vázquez3, Maristella D'Addario2.
Abstract
Land use and climate change are affecting the abundance and distribution of species. The Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) is a very diverse region due to geological history, geographic position, and climate. It is also one of the most disturbed regions in Mexico. Reptiles are particularly sensitive to environmental changes due to their low dispersal capacity and thermal ecology. In this study, we define the important environmental variables (considering climate, topography, and land use) and potential distribution (present and future) of the five Thamnophis species present in TMVB. To do so, we used the maximum entropy modeling software (MAXENT). First, we modeled to select the most important variables to explain the distribution of each species, then we modeled again using only the most important variables and projected these models to the future considering a middle-moderate climate change scenario (rcp45), and land use and vegetation variables for the year 2050 (generated according to land use changes that occurred between years 2002 and 2011). Arid vegetation had an important negative effect on habitat suitability for all species, and minimum temperature of the coldest month was important for four of the five species. Thamnophis cyrtopsis was the species with the lowest tolerance to minimum temperatures. The maximum temperature of the warmest month was important for T. scalaris and T. cyrtopsis. Low percentages of agriculture were positive for T. eques and T. melanogaster but, at higher values, agriculture had a negative effect on habitat suitability for both species. Elevation was the most important variable to explain T. eques and T. melanogaster potential distribution while distance to Abies forests was the most important variable for T. scalaris and T. scaliger. All species had a high proportion of their potential distribution in the TMVB. However, according to our models, all Thamnophis species will experience reductions in their potential distribution in this region. T. scalaris will suffer the biggest reduction because this species is limited by high temperatures and will not be able to shift its distribution upward, as it is already present in the highest elevations of the TMVB.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; Environmental niche models; Land-use change; Potential distribution; Thamnophis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29666767 PMCID: PMC5903425 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Occurrence records used to build the distribution model for each Thamnophis species, showing the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) in dark gray.
Contribution percent of the most important variables that explain the distribution of each Thamnophis species.
| Variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum temperature of the coldest month | 33.7 | 19.2 | 11.3 | 26.5 | |
| Maximum temperature of the warmest month | 5.2 | 36 | |||
| Elevation | 28.4 | 27.3 | |||
| Arid vegetation | 26.4 | 15.6 | 11.5 | 4.9 | 5.3 |
| Agriculture | 9.6 | 12.9 | |||
| Distance to | 8.5 | ||||
| Distance to | 44.9 | 40.6 | |||
| Total | 73.8 | 72.8 | 63 | 85.8 | 72.4 |
Figure 2Land use change by category (km2) between years 2002 and 2011.
Figure 3Present (2011) and future (2050) maps of (A, B) agriculture, in red; (C, D) urban, in gray; and (E, F) induced grasslands, in orange.
Figure 4Present (2011) and future (2050) potential distribution maps for each Thamnophis species: (A, B) T. cyrtopsis, (C, D) T. eques, (E, F) T. melanogaster, (G, H) T. scalaris and (I, J) T. scaliger.
Present and future high suitability area (km2) and percent of reductions in these areas for each Thamnophis species in Mexico and the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB).
| MEXICO | TMVB | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present distribution (Km2) | Future distribution (Km2) | Reduction (%) | Present distribution (Km2) | Future distribution (Km2) | Reduction (%) | |
| 661,888.53 | 387,393.67 | 41.47 | 103,190.15 | 56,172.18 | 45.56 | |
| 583,936.04 | 554,336.36 | 5.07 | 102,001.64 | 88,928.44 | 12.82 | |
| 255,647.78 | 317,411.39 | −24.16 | 83,237.55 | 67,581.46 | 18.81 | |
| 110,441.63 | 50,474.08 | 54.30 | 54,057.65 | 24,825.27 | 54.08 | |
| 58,682.16 | 37,278.67 | 36.47 | 42,804.76 | 26,617.94 | 37.82 | |