| Literature DB >> 29666426 |
Siiri E Iismaa1,2, Ming Li1,3, Scott Kesteven1, Jianxin Wu1, Andrea Y Chan1, Sara R Holman1, John W Calvert4, Ahtesham Ul Haq1, Amy M Nicks1, Nawazish Naqvi5, Ahsan Husain5, Michael P Feneley1,2, Robert M Graham6,7.
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that adult transgenic C57BL/6J mice with CM-restricted overexpression of the dominant negative W v mutant protein (dn-c-kit-Tg) respond to pressure overload with robust cardiomyocyte (CM) cell cycle entry. Here, we tested if outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) due to coronary artery ligation are improved in this transgenic model. Compared to non-transgenic littermates (NTLs), adult male dn-c-kit-Tg mice displayed CM hypertrophy and concentric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the absence of an increase in workload. Stroke volume and cardiac output were preserved and LV wall stress was markedly lower than that in NTLs, leading to a more energy-efficient heart. In response to MI, infarct size in adult (16-week old) dn-c-kit-Tg hearts was similar to that of NTL after 24 h but was half that in NTL hearts 12 weeks post-MI. Cumulative CM cell cycle entry was only modestly increased in dn-c-kit-Tg hearts. However, dn-c-kit-Tg mice were more resistant to infarct expansion, adverse LV remodelling and contractile dysfunction, and suffered no early death from LV rupture, relative to NTL mice. Thus, pre-existing cardiac hypertrophy lowers wall stress in dn-c-kit-Tg hearts, limits infarct expansion and prevents death from myocardial rupture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29666426 PMCID: PMC5904135 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24525-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1CM-specific overexpression of dn-c-kit resulted in CM hypertrophy, leading to a thicker LV wall, a smaller LV cavity and higher ejection fraction. (a) Expression of Kit (c-Kit) mRNA in male P196 dn-c-kit-Tg (Tg; n = 11) and NTL (n = 6) hearts; differences analysed by Student’s t-test. (b,c) Examples (white arrowheads) of BrdU+/cTnT+ (b) or H3P+/cTnT+ (c) CMs isolated from P121 Tg (b, right panel, and c) or NTL (b, left panel) hearts after 9 days of BrdU (10 mg/kg/day) infusion by osmotic mini-pump. Scale bar: 50 μm. (d) Left panels, representative photographs, and right panel, quantitation of surface area showing hypertrophy of isolated CMs from P121 Tg (682 CMs analysed from n = 3 mice) relative to NTL hearts (1015 CMs analysed from n = 3 mice); differences analysed by Student’s t-test. Scale bar: 100 μm. (e) Abundance of Myh6 (encoding α-MHC) and Acta1 (α-skeletal actin) mRNAs was similar, while abundance of other mRNAs (Nppa (ANP), Nppb (BNP), Myh7 (β-MHC)) and the Myh7:Myh6 (β-:α-MHC) ratio were significantly increased in male P196 dn-c-kit-Tg relative to NTL hearts (n = 7); differences analysed by Student’s t-test. (f) Increased LV wall thickness to chamber radius (h/r) ratio at end-diastole in P ≥ 196 dn-c-kit-Tg (n = 10–11) relative to NTL (n = 9) hearts; differences analysed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (g) Increased ejection fraction in P ≥ 196 dn-c-kit-Tg (n = 10–11) relative to NTL (n = 9) hearts; differences analysed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
NTL and dn-c-kit-Tg cardiac morphometry during postnatal and adult development.
| Parameter | Genotype | P10 | P18 | P35 | P112 ( | P196 | P365 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | NTL | 4.68 ± 0.11 | 8.69 ± 0.28 | 18.4 ± 0.3 | 30.96 ± 0.8 ( | 31.64 ± 0.86 | 33.2 ± 0.72 |
| Tg | 4.87 ± 0.13 | 8.46 ± 0.21 | 18.3 ± 0.1 | 31.91 ± 0.6 ( | 30.96 ± 0.84 | 31.4 ± 0.63 | |
| HW (mg) | NTL | 25.6 ± 0.5 | 52.3 ± 1.3 | 85.0 ± 1.2 | 134.2 ± 4.4 ( | 144.3 ± 4.9 | 128.7 ± 3.7 |
| Tg | 26.1 ± 0.6 | 61.4 ± 2.2 | 105.2 ± 0.8* | 174.0 ± 3.8*** ( | 181.5 ± 6.6*** | 180.6 ± 4.5*** | |
| LVW (mg) | NTL | ND | ND | 60.5 ± 1.0 | 100.1 ± 3.1 ( | 105.4 ± 3 | ND |
| Tg | ND | ND | 75.3 ± 0.7** | 126.4 ± 3.9*** ( | 138.5 ± 4.3*** | ND | |
| TL (mm) | NTL | ND | ND | ND | 17.9 ± 0.05 ( | 17.7 ± 0.1 | ND |
| Tg | ND | ND | ND | 18.0 ± 0.08 ( | 17.7 ± 0.1 | ND | |
| LVW/TL (mg/mm) | NTL | ND | ND | ND | 5.6 ± 0.2 ( | 6.1 ± 0.2 | ND |
| Tg | ND | ND | ND | 7.0 ± 0.2*** ( | 7.5 ± 0.3*** | ND |
P10 and P18 mice included males and females; P ≥ 35 mice were male. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 NTL vs Tg. BW, body weight; HW, heart weight; LVW, left ventricular weight; TL, tibia length; LV, left ventricle; ND, not determined.
NTL and dn-c-kit-Tg cardiac function during postnatal and adult development.
| Parameter | Genotype | P10 | P35 | P196 | P365 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | NTL | 440 ± 7 | 522 ± 32 | 460 ± 17 | 513 ± 21 |
| Tg | 433 ± 12 | 465 ± 15 | 460 ± 14 | 548 ± 22 | |
| LV internal chamber radius ( | NTL | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 1.89 ± 0.05 | 1.74 ± 0.05 | 1.73 ± 0.05 |
| Tg | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 1.71 ± 0.04 | 1.48 ± 0.07** | 1.53 ± 0.06* | |
| LVED wall thickness ( | NTL | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 1.07 ± 0.07 |
| Tg | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.05* | 1.5 ± 0.06*** | 1.34 ± 0.10* | |
| Diastolic | NTL | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.6 ± 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.05 |
| Tg | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.38 ± 0.03 | 1.0 ± 0.05*** | 0.92 ± 0.11** | |
| LVEDV (μL) | NTL | 13 ± 1 | 61 ± 4 | 51 ± 4 | 50 ± 3 |
| Tg | 11 ± 1 | 48 ± 3 | 35 ± 4** | 37 ± 3* | |
| LVESV (μL) | NTL | 3 ± 0.4 | 25 ± 2 | 14 ± 1 | 15.1 ± 1.8 |
| Tg | 2 ± 0.5 | 16 ± 1** | 5 ± 1*** | 5.6 ± 0.7*** | |
| SV (μL) | NTL | 10 ± 1 | 37 ± 3 | 36 ± 2 | 35.1 ± 2 |
| Tg | 9 ± 1 | 33 ± 2 | 32 ± 3 | 31.8 ± 3 | |
| CO (mL/min) | NTL | 5 ± 0.5 | 19 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 20 ± 1 |
| Tg | 4 ± 0.5 | 15 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 17 ± 2 | |
| LVESP (mmHg) | NTL | ND | ND | 107 ± 5 | ND |
| Tg | ND | ND | 112 ± 4 | ND | |
| LVES wall stress (mm Hg) | NTL | ND | ND | 48 ± 5 | ND |
| Tg | ND | ND | 17 ± 2*** | ND | |
| LVED wall stress (mm Hg) | NTL | ND | ND | 14 ± 2 | ND |
| Tg | ND | ND | 9 ± 1* | ND | |
| %EF | NTL | 77.69 ± 1.94 | 59.87 ± 2.6 (6) | 66.7 ± 2.00 | 70.5 ± 2.1 |
| Tg | 78.38 ± 3.38 | 67.49 ± 1.94 (8) | 79.6 ± 3.1*** | 85.3 ± 1.2*** | |
| Triple product [HR × dP/dtmax × LVES wall stress] at level of mid-papillary muscle | NTL | ND | ND | 2.2 × 108 ± 3.9 × 107
| ND |
| Tg | ND | ND | 9.2 × 107 ± 1.4 × 107* | ND |
P10 and P18 mice included males and females; P ≥ 35 mice were male. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for all except LVES wall stress, LVED wall stress and Triple product where Student’s t-test was applied: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 NTL vs Tg. HR, heart rate; LV, left ventricle; LVED, left ventricular end-diastolic; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; LVESP, left ventricular end-systolic pressure; EF, ejection fraction; ND, not determined.
Characteristics of CMs from male NTL and dn-c-kit-Tg mice (age P112-P121)
| Parameter | NTL | Tg |
|---|---|---|
| % 1N | 10 ± 1 | 12 ± 2 |
| % 2N | 79 ± 2 | 74 ± 2 |
| % >2N | 11 ± 1 | 14 ± 3 |
| % 2n | 96.5 ± 0.3 | 96.2 ± 0.3 |
| % 4n | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.5 |
| % >4n | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.07 |
| %BrdU+/cTnT+ CMs | 0.013 ± 0.01 | 0.301 ± 0.07** |
| %H3P+/cTnT+ CMs | 0 | 0.017 ± 0.008 |
| %AurB+/cTnT+ CMs | 0 | 0 |
| TUNEL staining | 0 | 0 |
| CM area, μm2 | 4898 ± 52 | 6112 ± 78* |
| No. of CMs/heart | 2.2 × 106 ± 1 × 105
| 2.1 × 106 ± 3 × 104
|
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. N, CM nucleation state: mono (1N), bi (2N), multi-nucleated (>2N) determined from 3,699 NTL CMs and 3,193 Tg CMs from n = 4 mice; % n, haploid number in CM nuclei (ploidy state) determined from 42,589 NTL and 57,676 Tg CMs from n = 4 and n = 6 mice, respectively; 115,070 NTL CMs and 88,473 Tg CMs from n = 2 mice were analysed for BrdU-positivity; 85,000 NTL CMs and 86,400 Tg CMs from n = 2 mice were analysed for H3P-positivity; 68,000 NTL CMs and 72,000 Tg CMs from n = 2 mice were analysed for AurB-positivity; 1015 NTL CMs and 682 Tg CMs from n = 3 mice were analysed for CM area. Student’s t-test: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Twenty-four hours post-MI, infarct size was no different, but 12 weeks post-MI, survival was improved, infarct size was reduced and LV remodelling was absent in dn-c-kit-Tg (Tg) relative to NTL mice. (a) Representative photographs of Alcian-blue perfused and TTC-stained sections of NTL andTg hearts 24 h post-MI (age P113). (b) Twenty-four hours post-MI, there was no significant difference (analysed by Students t-test) between NTL (n = 11) and Tg (n = 12) hearts with respect to infarct size expressed as a percentage of the LV. (c) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of Tg (n = 23) and NTL (n = 24) mice after MI; analysed by log-rank test. (d) Left panels, representative photographs of NTL and Tg hearts 12 weeks post-MI (age P196). Middle panels, representative photographs of LVs from NTL and Tg hearts 12 weeks post-MI, with the LV cut open and pinned flat to expose the endocardial surface and the infarct area outlined by white dashed lines. Right panel, infarct size was smaller in Tg (n = 17) versus NTL (n = 11) hearts; analysed by Student’s t-test. (e) Relative to their respective shams 12 weeks post-MI, abundance of fetal gene mRNAs (Nppa (ANP), Nppb (BNP), Myh7 (β-MHC) and the Myh7:Myh6 (α-MHC) ratio were higher in NTL (n = 7) but remained unchanged in Tg (n = 7) hearts, whereas abundance of Myh6 mRNA decreased in both (age P196); differences analysed by Student’s t-test. (f) Representative silver-stained 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel of size-fractionated heart homogenates that has been cropped (full-length gel in Supplementary Fig. S4) to show the presence of only α-MHC in NTL sham heart, and both α- and β-MHC isoforms in NTL hearts post-MI and in Tg sham and post-MI hearts (age P196).
Figure 3Cell cycle entry was modestly increased in dn-c-kit-Tg (Tg) but not in NTL mice post-MI. (a,b) Representative images of the border zone (BZ) of LV sections from 12 week post-sham or post-MI (age P196) NTL (a) or Tg (b) hearts co-stained for α-MHC (green), BrdU (red) and nuclei (DAPI, blue). Different focal planes (Z stacks) in the BZ in MI samples (or equivalent area in shams) were examined by confocal microscopy to identify all CMs that had cumulatively incorporated BrdU (white arrowheads). Enlarged insets are examples of XY and XZ reconstruction planes for randomly chosen α-MHC+/BrdU+ CMs. Right panels, quantitation of five representative fields, x40 objective, in the infarct BZ (or equivalent area in shams) showing the number of BrdU+ CMs was greater in the BZ of Tg hearts (b) but not NTL (a) hearts 12 weeks post-MI relative to sham controls; differences analysed by Student’s t-test. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Histology of NTL and dn-c-kit-Tg hearts three months after sham operation or myocardial infarction (age P196).
| Parameter | NTL sham | NTL MI | Tg sham | Tg MI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent fibrosis | 0.9 ± 0.01 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
| Capillary density in remote zone (capillaries/mm2) | 3329 ± 332 | 3340 ± 445 | 2967 ± 230 | 3673 ± 577 |
| Capillary density/CM | 1.54 ± 0.09 | 1.47 ± 0.1 | 1.49 ± 0.06 | 1.54 ± 0.07 |
| Mean intercapillary distance (μm) | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.002 |
| TUNEL staining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n, number of animals. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 MI mice vs their respective sham-operated controls and †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001, NTL vs Tg mice. CM, cardiomyocyte.
Cardiac function of NTL and dn-c-kit-Tg hearts three months after sham operation or myocardial infarction (age P196).
| Parameter | NTL sham | NTL MI | Tg sham | Tg MI | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| BW (g) | 33.2 ± 0.9 | 33.4 ± 0.7 | 32.5 ± 0.9 | 33.0 ± 0.7 | ||||||||||||
| LV (mg) | 105.4 ± 3 | 137.4 ± 6*** | 138.5 ± 4†††
| 145.9 ± 4 | ||||||||||||
| LV/TL (mg/mm) | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.4** | 7.5 ± 0.3†
| 8.1 ± 0.3 | ||||||||||||
| RV (mg) | 26 ± 2 | 27 ± 1 | 32 ± 1 (14) | 31 ± 1 | ||||||||||||
| Atria weight (mg) | 9 ± 1 | 12 ± 2 | 9 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | ||||||||||||
| Lung weight (mg) | 163.9 ± 10 | 167.1 ± 5 | 166.8 ± 2 | 169.1 ± 5 | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| HR (bpm) | 460 ± 17 | 465 ± 23 | 460 ± 14 | 459 ± 18 | ||||||||||||
| LVEDV (μl) | 50 ± 3 | 127 ± 25*** | 37 ± 3 | 61 ± 5†††
| ||||||||||||
| LVESV (μL) | 14 ± 1 | 86 ± 21*** | 5 ± 1 | 26 ± 4†††
| ||||||||||||
| SV (μL) | 36 ± 2 | 41 ± 5 | 32 ± 3 | 35 ± 2 | ||||||||||||
| CO (mL/min) | 17 ± 1 | 19 ± 2 | 15 ± 1 | 16 ± 1 | ||||||||||||
| EF (%) | 71.8 ± 1 | 38 ± 5*** | 87 ± 2†
| 61 ± 4***†††
| ||||||||||||
| mid-pap | 1 mm | 2 mm | 3 mm | mid-pap | 1 mm | 2 mm | 3 mm | mid-pap | 1 mm | 2 mm | 3 mm | mid-pap | 1 mm | 2 mm | 3 mm | |
| LVED wall thickness, | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 1.0 ± 0.03 | 0.9 ± 0.03 | 0.8 ± 0.05 | 1.2 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.05 | 1.0 ± 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.05 | 1.5 ± 0.05†††
| 1.3 ± 0.04††
| 1.2 ± 0.06††
| 1.0 ± 0.05††
| 1.4 ± 0.04 | 1.3 ± 0.05 | 1.1 ± 0.06 | 0.9 ± 0.08 |
| LV internal chamber radius, | 1.8 ± 0.04 | 1.7 ± | 1.4 ± 0.07 | 1.1 ± 0.06 | 2.3 ± 0.1* | 2.3 ± 0.2** | 2.2 ± 0.2*** | 2.3 ± 0.2*** | 1.5 ± 0.06 | 1.4 ± 0.07 | 1.3 ± 0.06 | 1.1 ± 0.08 | 1.8 ± 0.05††
| 1.7 ± 0.05††
| 1.6 ± 0.06†††
| 1.5 ± 0.1*†††
|
| LV epicardial radius ( | 3 ± 0.06 | 2.8 ± 0.06 | 2.4 ± 0.08 | 1.9 ± 0.09 | 3.5 ± 0.1** | 3.4 ± 0.2** | 3.2 ± 0.2*** | 3.1 ± 0.2*** | 3 ± 0.05 | 2.8 ± 0.06 | 2.5 ± 0.08 | 2.1 ± 0.09 | 3.2 ± 0.06 | 3 ± 0.06 | 2.7 ± 0.07††
| 2.4 ± 0.1†††
|
| Tissue area, SAX at diastole (mm2) | 16.5 ± 0.8 | 14.7 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 22.6 ± 1.2** | 19.6 ± 1.9* | 17.0 ± 1.9** | 13.7 ± 1.5** | 20.4 ± 0. 7†
| 17.4 ± 0.7 | 14.4 ± 1 | 10.4 ± 0.8 | 21.7 ± 0.8 | 19.0 ± 0.9 | 15.1 ± 1 | 10.8 ± 1.1 |
| % Fractional Area Change | 68 ± 2 | 69 ± 2 | 61 ± 3 | 75 ± 4 | 44 ± 7* | 34 ± 5*** | 32 ± 6** | 23 ± 7*** | 89 ± 2†
| 84 ± 3 | 85 ± 5†
| 79 ± 6 | 75 ± 2†††
| 60 ± 3**††
| 45 ± 6*** | 41 ± 8*** |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| HR (bpm) | 469 ± 6 | 463 ± 6 | 472 ± 5 | 470 ± 3 | ||||||||||||
| LVEDP (mm Hg) | 7 ± 0.5 | 5 ± 0.6 | 9 ± 1 | 9 ± 0.6†
| ||||||||||||
| LVESP (mm Hg) | 107 ± 5 | 99 ± 4 | 112 ± 4 | 109 ± 3 | ||||||||||||
| PRSW slope (single beat; mmHg/s) | 218.7 ± 15.1 | 115.7 ± 20*** | 290.6 ± 7.3††
| 199.5 ± 16.7***††
| ||||||||||||
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n, number of animals. Ordinary one-way or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 MI mice vs their respective sham-operated controls and †p < 0.05, ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001, NTL vs Tg mice BW, body weight; LV, left ventricle; TL, tibia length; RV, right ventricle; HR, heart rate; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output; EF, ejection fraction; SAX, short axis view; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVESP, left ventricular end-systolic pressure; PRSW, preload recruitable stroke work.
Figure 4Cardiac contractile function 12 weeks post-MI was better preserved in dn-c-kit-Tg (Tg) relative to NTL hearts. (a) EF was greater in P196 Tg sham (n = 15) and post-MI hearts (n = 16) relative to NTL controls (n = 9), and post-MI loss of ejection fraction was less in Tg than in NTL hearts, relative to respective sham controls; differences analysed by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (b) Single beat PRSW slopes indicate contractility was greater in P196 Tg sham (n = 15) and post-MI (n = 16) hearts relative to NTL (n = 8–9) hearts, and post-MI loss of contractility of Tg hearts was less than that of NTL hearts relative to their respective sham controls; differences analysed by ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (c) dP/dtmax normalised to LVEDV was greater in P196 sham Tg (n = 15) relative to NTL (n = 8) hearts and in post-MI Tg (n = 16) relative to NTL (n = 9) hearts; differences analysed by Student’s t-test.