| Literature DB >> 29666318 |
Yongcun Zhao1, Meiyan Wang1, Shuijin Hu2,3, Xudong Zhang4, Zhu Ouyang5, Ganlin Zhang1, Biao Huang6, Shiwei Zhao7, Jinshui Wu8, Deti Xie9, Bo Zhu10, Dongsheng Yu1, Xianzhang Pan1, Shengxiang Xu1, Xuezheng Shi11.
Abstract
China's croplands have experienced drastic changes in management practices, such as fertilization, tillage, and residue treatments, since the 1980s. There is an ongoing debate about the impact of these changes on soil organic carbon (SOC) and its implications. Here we report results from an extensive study that provided direct evidence of cropland SOC sequestration in China. Based on the soil sampling locations recorded by the Second National Soil Survey of China in 1980, we collected 4,060 soil samples in 2011 from 58 counties that represent the typical cropping systems across China. Our results showed that across the country, the average SOC stock in the topsoil (0-20 cm) increased from 28.6 Mg C ha-1 in 1980 to 32.9 Mg C ha-1 in 2011, representing a net increase of 140 kg C ha-1 year-1 However, the SOC change differed among the major agricultural regions: SOC increased in all major agronomic regions except in Northeast China. The SOC sequestration was largely attributed to increased organic inputs driven by economics and policy: while higher root biomass resulting from enhanced crop productivity by chemical fertilizers predominated before 2000, higher residue inputs following the large-scale implementation of crop straw/stover return policy took over thereafter. The SOC change was negatively related to N inputs in East China, suggesting that the excessive N inputs, plus the shallowness of plow layers, may constrain the future C sequestration in Chinese croplands. Our results indicate that cropland SOC sequestration can be achieved through effectively manipulating economic and policy incentives to farmers.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese cropland; carbon sequestration; crop residue management; soil organic carbon
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29666318 PMCID: PMC5910801 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700292114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205