| Literature DB >> 29666176 |
Troels Yndigegn1, Robin Hofmann2, Tomas Jernberg3, Chris P Gale4.
Abstract
Randomised clinical trials are the gold standard for testing the effectiveness of clinical interventions. However, increasing complexity and associated costs may limit their application in the investigation of key cardiovascular knowledge gaps such as the re-evaluation of generic pharmacotherapies. The registry-based randomised clinical trial (RRCT) leverages data sampling from nationwide quality registries to facilitate high participant inclusion rates at comparably low costs and, therefore, may offer a mechanism by which such clinical questions may be answered. To date, a number of studies have been conducted using such trial designs, but uncritical use of the RRCT design may lead to erroneous conclusions. The current review provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the RRCT, as well as provides an exploratory example of how a trial may be designed to test the long-term effectiveness of beta blockers in patients with myocardial infarction who have preserved left ventricular systolic function. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.Entities:
Keywords: Acute Myocardial Infarction; Electronic Medical Records; Pharmacology; Study Design
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29666176 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart ISSN: 1355-6037 Impact factor: 5.994