Literature DB >> 29666009

In vitro validation of a self-driving aortic-turbine venous-assist device for Fontan patients.

Kerem Pekkan1, Ibrahim Basar Aka2, Ece Tutsak2, Erhan Ermek2, Haldun Balim2, Ismail Lazoglu2, Riza Turkoz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Palliative repair of single ventricle defects involve a series of open-heart surgeries where a single-ventricle (Fontan) circulation is established. As the patient ages, this paradoxical circulation gradually fails, because of its high venous pressure levels. Reversal of the Fontan paradox requires an extra subpulmonic energy that can be provided through mechanical assist devices. The objective of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of a totally implantable integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist (iATVA) system, which does not need an external drive power and maintains low venous pressure chronically, for the Fontan circulation.
METHODS: Blade designs of the co-rotating turbine and pump impellers were developed and 3 prototypes were manufactured. After verifying the single-ventricle physiology at a pulsatile in vitro circuit, the hemodynamic performance of the iATVA system was measured for pediatric and adult physiology, varying the aortic steal percentage and circuit configurations. The iATVA system was also tested at clinical off-design scenarios.
RESULTS: The prototype iATVA devices operate at approximately 800 revolutions per minute and extract up to 10% systemic blood from the aorta to use this hydrodynamic energy to drive a blood turbine, which in turn drives a mixed-flow venous pump passively. By transferring part of the available energy from the single-ventricle outlet to the venous side, the iATVA system is able to generate up to approximately 5 mm Hg venous recovery while supplying the entire caval flow.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experiments show that a totally implantable iATVA system is feasible, which will eliminate the need for external power for Fontan mechanical venous assist and combat gradual postoperative venous remodeling and Fontan failure.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fontan; congenital heart disease; hemodynamics; mock-up circulation tests; pediatric ventricle assist device; single-ventricle physiology; venous hemodynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29666009      PMCID: PMC6021195          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


Chronic mechanical venous support driven by an aortic turbine for Fontan patients. An integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist device that requires no external power can eliminate driveline infections and reverse the detrimental effects of single-ventricle physiology, passively. For failed Fontan patients with high SVP and persistent hemodynamic decline, the only treatment is cardiac transplantation. A chronic assist device that maintains low SVP can heal at-risk patients well before deteriorating to this terminal state. With low aortic steal, no desaturation, and external drive power, this novel system will impact congenital heart disease management. See Editorial Commentaries pages 302 and 304. See Editorial page 289. The Fontan procedure and its subsequent modifications are a set of surgical procedures specifically designed for complex single-ventricle patients in whom a series-circulation is reconstructed by channeling systemic venous return directly to the lungs (around the heart) so that the single-ventricle is filled by fully saturated pulmonary venous blood, which is then pumped to the body.1, 2, 3 As would be expected, the initial experience with the Fontan procedure was characterized by the sudden lack of active right-heart pumping of blood into the pulmonary arterial tree, resulting in significant venous congestion, reduced ventricular filling, low cardiac output, and often, death.4, 5, 6 Despite these physiological challenges, advances in pediatric cardiovascular surgery have resulted in reduced morbidity and mortality in this patient group.7, 8, 9, 10, 11 This trend has also dramatically increased the number of adult Fontan survivors having severe late complications related to the gastrointestinal system, including feeding disorders, liver dysfunction, protein losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, and eventual failed-Fontan states. Although the causes for these complications are multifactorial, chronically high systemic venous pressure (SVP) is widely accepted to be the fundamental problematic factor that results in gradual remodeling in the venous vascular and lymphatic systems.12, 13, 14 To alleviate this problem, an inferior vena cava (IVC) fenestration is used as a type of pop-off valve for high SVP, but with decreased oxygen saturation, in which novel fenestration flow control mechanisms were introduced. As an optimum solution for high SVP, the need for venous Fontan ventricular assist (FVAD),16, 17 erroneously compared with traditional mechanical circulatory assistance, was introduced by de Leval,4, 5 providing low venous pressure head and high flow rate to address the “Fontan paradox.” Since then, the mechanical univentricle assist has been explored through acute animal models, pioneered by Rodefeld et al,18, 19, 20 followed by a number of cases, describing initial experience with the available pediatric assist systems in single-ventricle patients.21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 Our earlier work summarized standard single-ventricle assist configurations,28, 29, 30 and also introduced the recently popular ejector pumps for IVC or superior vena cava (SVC) augmentation. Today, FVADs are designed specifically for the pediatric population using novel impellers with ultra-low blood damage. Performance characteristics of selected FVAD systems are compared in Table E1. However, the use of FVAD as a long-term therapy with a totally implanted impeller has not been realized with the state-of-the art technology.
Table E1

Average operating points (mean venous pressure decrease and flow rate values) of existing single-ventricle devices intended to support Fontan circulation are compared with the new iATVA prototypes

Pump designVenous pressure decrease, mm HgFlow rate, LPMImpeller speed, rpmNotes
PropellerE35 to 500.5 to 3.55000 to 7000Hydraulic in vitro and simulation performance
AxialE45 to 2021700 to 4500Failing Fontan
AxialE52.43.7No information
No impeller bladesE65 to 200 to 50 to 7000Dual IVC/SVC support, mock-up flow loop
Berlin heartE7No information3.880 Strokes/minHypoplastic left heart patient
iATVA, present study5.75705IVC support
CentrifugalE810No informationNo information
AxialE9123.1 to 1.218,000 to 24,000Piglet model
AxialE1074.610,000Jarvik VAD

All existing devices require external drive power. LPM, Liters per minute; IVC, inferior vena cava; SCV, superior vena cava; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist; VAD, ventricle assist device.

For FVAD systems, the need for external power to drive the venous pump unit is a major technological grand challenge. This requirement significantly limits the primary function of FVADs to be implanted for independent use long-term. To address this challenge, we present a novel implantable Fontan assist system that requires no external power and therefore has the potential to passively resolve the Fontan paradox. The device extracts a minimal amount of aortic blood, which is at high systemic pressure head, and uses this available energy to drive an aortic turbine (see Figure 1). In turn, the blood turbine drives a typical mechanical assist device (pump impeller), which supplies the required high-flow and low-pressure venous head through the IVC and/or SVC. The impellers of this new integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist (iATVA) system are connected through a common shaft and rotate at the same speed. This system transfers part of the available aortic energy to the venous site, where it is most needed in the single-ventricle circulation. In this research study we investigated the feasibility of the first-generation iATVA prototypes using our bench-top single-ventricle circulation mock-up circuit,29, 33 before their detailed mechanical design and planned animal experiments in the near future.
Figure 1

Chronic mechanical venous support without external drive power for Fontan patients. An iATVA device connected through a common shaft that steals a minimal amount of aortic blood to drive a blood turbine and transfers this available pumping energy to the venous side where it is most needed. The iATVA device can resolve the Fontan paradox passively by reversing its gradual vascular complications. The main function of the blood turbine—the inlet/outlet of which can be reconstructed from PTFE, is to extract the available energy from the pressure potential difference that exists in typical pediatric shunts, such as the Blalock–Taussig shunt.

Chronic mechanical venous support without external drive power for Fontan patients. An iATVA device connected through a common shaft that steals a minimal amount of aortic blood to drive a blood turbine and transfers this available pumping energy to the venous side where it is most needed. The iATVA device can resolve the Fontan paradox passively by reversing its gradual vascular complications. The main function of the blood turbine—the inlet/outlet of which can be reconstructed from PTFE, is to extract the available energy from the pressure potential difference that exists in typical pediatric shunts, such as the Blalock–Taussig shunt.

Methods

Hydrodynamic Design and Turbomachinery

A parametric design of the iATVA system was prepared to document its ideal operating ranges and performance capabilities. The design parameters were formulated around the 2 baseline operating conditions, corresponding to the postoperative pediatric (total cardiac output [CO] 3 liters per minute [LPM] and 60% IVC flow split) and adult Fontan stages (5 LPM with 80% IVC flow split). For these conditions the hydrodynamic design of 3 iATVA prototypes were completed (see Figure 2 and Table E2). The detailed design process is provided in the section “Turbomachinery Calculations” of Appendix E1.
Figure 2

Top row: Components and assembly of the iATVA. Bottom row: Basic blade angles and impeller dimensions (in millimeters) for the turbine and pump side. The turbine and pump side of the device is designed to be enclosed in a single chamber. The completed device is made of 5 parts: turbine shroud, turbine impeller, pump shroud, pump impeller, and a connection housing in between, which is attached to both shrouds and carries the single bearing holding both impellers. All attachments are designed to be a tight fit.

Table E2

Main design parameters of 3 iATVA prototypes (P1, P2, and P3) are summarized

TurbinePump
Flow rate, LPM0.5 (aortic steal)3.0 P1, 1.8 P2, 3.0 P3
Blade height, mm59 P1, 4.5 P2, 9 P3
Impeller diameter, mm3832
Blade angle, β275°60°
Number of blades6 P1, 6 P2, 12 P35
Shroud volume, cm31.1 P1, 1.1 P2, 0.5 P212.6 P1, 11.5 P2, 11.5 P2
Volute volume, cm31.163.1 P1, 2.0 P2, 2.0 P2

Differences between iATVA versions are the turbine blade numbers and pump volute size. The flow rate specification that defines the turbine section shape is kept the same for all 3 designs to steal less from the aortic current (0.5 LPM). Physiologic IVC flow rates corresponding to baseline pediatric and adult hemodynamics are used. LPM, Liters per minute.

Top row: Components and assembly of the iATVA. Bottom row: Basic blade angles and impeller dimensions (in millimeters) for the turbine and pump side. The turbine and pump side of the device is designed to be enclosed in a single chamber. The completed device is made of 5 parts: turbine shroud, turbine impeller, pump shroud, pump impeller, and a connection housing in between, which is attached to both shrouds and carries the single bearing holding both impellers. All attachments are designed to be a tight fit. For the placement of the turbine drainage outlet, 3 alternative locations were considered; common atrium, proximally ligated axillary artery, and distal pulmonary artery (PA), each having different available drive power (see Figure E1). For this research study the turbine was positioned between the aorta and the common atrium (Figure 1 and Figure E1, Configuration 1), where the maximum available pressure head between the aortic inlet and turbine outlet is approximately 90 mm Hg.
Figure E1

Different iATVA configuration alternatives schematically illustrated. All alternatives are implanted in the single ventricle (SV) circulation. Configurations 1, 2, and 4 vary in terms of the blood turbine outlet drainage location. This study investigated configuration 1 (C1) whereby the blood turbine outlet is drained to the common atrium (ca). Configuration 2 (C2) drains to the distal of the pulmonary artery. Configuration 4 (C4) drains proximal to the axillary artery. Configuration 3 (C3) illustrates a double-inlet double-outlet venous pump configuration without a total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). Note that there is no oxygen desaturation in iATVA configurations. UB, Upper body systemic bed; SVC, superior vena cava; RPA, right pulmonary artery; LPA, left pulmonary artery; LB, lower body systemic bed; IVC, inferior vena cava; Ao, aorta; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist.

Manufacturing and Assembly

All parts were manufactured by +90 Rapid Prototyping (Istanbul, Turkey), using a Stratasys Connex500 (Stratasys, Eden Prairie, Minn) 3-D printer, except for the bearing. The transparent shrouds and impellers were manufactured with Polyjet–Veroclear and Verowhite resins (Stratasys), respectively. Standard steel bearing (MOS, Istanbul, Turkey), with 5 × 14 × 5 mm dimensions were used. Tight-fitting tolerances were assured for manual assembly of parts by fine polishing.

In Vitro Mock-Up Flow Loop

The prototype iATVA systems were evaluated at the bench-top first using a steady turbine inlet flow setup and then using our pulsatile in vitro single-ventricle circuit29, 33 (Figure E2). Previously, we validated both setups for testing pediatric ventricle assist devices in Fontan circulation and described the experimental approach in detail. For the instrumentation and setup components for this present study please refer to the Appendix E1 in vitro mock-up flow loop and instrumentation. The iATVA device was located along a bypass line, parallel to the IVC, using Y-connectors, which allowed the instantaneous introduction of the device to the single-ventricle circulation without stopping or dismantling the flow circuit. The total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) state was first established in accordance with our standard protocol and any deviations in hemodynamic parameters after the iATVA was introduced were recorded.
Figure E2

Steady and pulsatile flow experiments. Measurement locations and iATVA connection ports are illustrated in top left illustration, corresponding to the steady flow set-up, which allows the static pressure head measurements of the venous pump at different steady aortic steal levels (top right). The iATVA was introduced in the mock-up single-ventricle circuit featuring an idealized glass TCPC replica (bottom row). The mock-up system flow rate was set by the pulse duplicator by adjusting stroke and stroke volume. Desired pressure level was maintained by changing the IVC and SVC resistances. Pulsatile pressure measurements were acquired from the aortic outlet and the iATVA pump/turbine inlets and outlets. Pulsatile flow measurements were acquired from the IVC, SVC, and turbine inlet/outlet and pump outlet. Turbine impeller speed was measured for each flow rate using a tachometer. The Y-connection established a parallel bypass circuit, which allowed for easy switching between the single-ventricle circulation with and without iATVA devices. See also Video 1, recorded during the experiments. ΔP, Net venous pressure augmentation provided by the pump impeller; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist; SVC, superior vena cava; TCPC, total cavopulmonary connection; IVC, inferior vena cava.

Results

Ideal Device Characteristics

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the turbomachinery design of a blood turbine in cardiovascular device literature. The low aortic steal requirement of the iATVA system results in low turbine specific speeds (nondimensional specific speed = 103) corresponding to mechanically challenging radial impellers, even reaching impulse turbine configuration if higher efficiency is desired. For the venous side a mixed-impeller is found to be optimal to assist the Fontan circulation, with nondimensional specific speed = 1.2. The rotational speed varies between 800 to 1800 revolutions per minute (rpm), generating a net venous pressure augmentation (ΔP) of 3 to 12 mm Hg through the pump (ie, SVP decrease, pump outlet distal PA pressure increase). The ideal characteristics of the iATVA system is estimated from turbomachinery theory and summarized in Figure 3. It is observed that for adult as well as pediatric flow requirements the iATVA system can provide sufficient venous pressure ramp at the pump impeller that drives the IVC flow for a conservative power transmission efficiency (50%). Even with less than 5% of aortic steal, up to 5 mm Hg venous pressure augmentation is possible. As the power generation chart in Figure 3 (top row) indicates, higher turbine outer diameter and blade trail end angle leads to a higher power generation. To achieve a stable operating point and small turbine size for easy implantation, the prototype design dimensions are located at the relatively flat region resulting in a turbine outer diameter of 38 mm (see Figure 3, top left). Coupled to this selected turbine operating point, the corresponding venous pump characteristics are summarized in Figure 3 (top right) where an impeller blade height of 10 mm and pump diameter of 32 mm was chosen for a blade trail angle of 60°. For an adult Fontan patient having a cardiac output of 5 LPM and high IVC flow split 80% (4 LPM), pump ΔP is approximately 7.8 mm Hg for an aortic steal of 10% at 90 mm Hg systemic pressure. For this design, the pediatric flow requirements that have lower CO (3 LPM) and more balanced IVC/SVC flow split, lead to higher ΔP values reaching 15 mm Hg, with an aortic flow steal of 10% and 90 mm Hg systemic pressure (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Ideal characteristics of the iATVA system estimated from turbomachinery theory. Top row: On the left, available turbine power is plotted as a function of turbine outer diameter and outlet blade angle, for adult total cardiac output (CO) and corresponding inferior vena cava (IVC) flow split (80%). Note that the turbine power is equal to pump power divided by the total mechanical efficiency (0.50). Selected operating point of the iATVA prototype is shown as a red dot. On the right, for this operating point (shown on left) the pump side performance is plotted as a function of outlet blade angle and pump outer diameter. Characteristics for the pediatric flow conditions are similar. Bottom row: Possible venous pressure decrease ranges for the pump impeller as a function of the turbine pressure decrease (aortic minus turbine outlet) and aortic steal percent. Pediatric and adult flow conditions are shown on the left and right, respectively. LPM, Liters per minute.

Ideal characteristics of the iATVA system estimated from turbomachinery theory. Top row: On the left, available turbine power is plotted as a function of turbine outer diameter and outlet blade angle, for adult total cardiac output (CO) and corresponding inferior vena cava (IVC) flow split (80%). Note that the turbine power is equal to pump power divided by the total mechanical efficiency (0.50). Selected operating point of the iATVA prototype is shown as a red dot. On the right, for this operating point (shown on left) the pump side performance is plotted as a function of outlet blade angle and pump outer diameter. Characteristics for the pediatric flow conditions are similar. Bottom row: Possible venous pressure decrease ranges for the pump impeller as a function of the turbine pressure decrease (aortic minus turbine outlet) and aortic steal percent. Pediatric and adult flow conditions are shown on the left and right, respectively. LPM, Liters per minute.

Steady-State Device Characteristics

The iATVA prototypes are tested at different steady turbine inflow rates (aortic steal) and the corresponding net venous pressure decrease (ΔP), delivered to the pump side at IVC is recorded (Figure 4). For prototypes P2 and P3, a ΔP of 5 mm Hg is achieved at 1 LPM turbine flow. When the turbine flow is increased slightly to 1.2 LPM pressure increase doubles.
Figure 4

For the 3 iATVA prototypes (P1, P2, and P3) corresponding venous pressure increase subject to a steady aortic turbine flow rate is plotted. Rotational speeds are measured at selected operating points labeled in blue. Positive pump pressures are recorded for all operating points. The 95% confidence interval for flow and pressure measurements are 0.014 liters per minute (LPM) and 0.29 mm Hg, respectively. Turbine pressure decrease varies 70 to 100 mm Hg for 1.0 to 1.3 LPM blood turbine operating flow rates. ΔP, Net venous pressure augmentation provided by the pump impeller.

For the 3 iATVA prototypes (P1, P2, and P3) corresponding venous pressure increase subject to a steady aortic turbine flow rate is plotted. Rotational speeds are measured at selected operating points labeled in blue. Positive pump pressures are recorded for all operating points. The 95% confidence interval for flow and pressure measurements are 0.014 liters per minute (LPM) and 0.29 mm Hg, respectively. Turbine pressure decrease varies 70 to 100 mm Hg for 1.0 to 1.3 LPM blood turbine operating flow rates. ΔP, Net venous pressure augmentation provided by the pump impeller. Lower rotational speeds than predicted by the ideal design are observed (see Figure 4). For P1, the delivered pressure head is stabilized after 400 rpm driven by a turbine flow of 0.95 LPM. At a flow rate of 1.3 LPM, an impeller speed of 700 rpm is recorded. For P2 and P3, higher impeller speeds are achieved because of the torque increase provided by a larger volute design. Although P2 and P3 show a similar performance between 0.85 and 1.3 LPM turbine drive flow, the torque increase in P3 design allows for very low aortic flow extraction, reaching 0.6 LPM and providing approximately a 1-mm Hg venous pressure augmentation.

Pulsatile In Vitro Performance

In the mock-up circuit, the single-ventricle (TCPC) circulation is first established with 86.1 and 96.2 mm Hg mean aortic pressure for pediatric and adult hemodynamics, respectively. The corresponding mean IVC flow is recorded as 2.2 LPM (pediatric) and 3.2 LPM (adult), and the sample waveforms are provided in Figure 5. When iATVA prototype 3 is introduced, turbine impeller rotation is observed immediately. An aortic steal of 1 LPM results in an acute decrease in average systemic pressure levels reaching 59.7 mm Hg (80.5 systolic, 46.3 diastolic) and 74.8 mm Hg (95.6 systolic, 64.2 diastolic) for pediatric and adult conditions respectively, which are adjusted back to their initial systemic pressure levels. The IVC/SVC flow splits are kept approximately constant and a venous pressure level of 11.4 mm Hg (pediatric) and 12.1 mm Hg (adult) is recorded through a net pump assist of 2 to 3 mm Hg (Figure 5). Sample cardiac-cycle averaged measurements with and without iATVA are provided in Table 1.
Figure 5

Sample hemodynamic waveforms established for the single-ventricle (TCPC) state, with iATVA (right column) and without iATVA (left column), in the mock-up circuit. “Pump pressure” is measured at the outlet of the pump corresponding to the pulmonary artery pressure. Pediatric and adult Fontan hemodynamic conditions correspond to 3.5 and 5 liters per minute (LPM) of total cardiac output, respectively, and satisfy the corresponding SVC/IVC flow splits as stated in the text. Measurements correspond to iATVA prototype 3, which is connected to the system with a Y connector in between the IVC outlet and TCPC inlet. The pump is switched on by removing the clamps on the turbine inlet and pump inlet. Average hemodynamic values and waveforms established for the single-ventricle (TCPC) state (without iATVA) in the mock-up circuit are provided in Table 1. TCPC, Total cavopulmonary connection; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist; SVC/IVC, superior vena cava/inferior vena cava.

Table 1

Sample hemodynamic measurements obtained during the pulsatile mock-up single-ventricle flow loop experiments

TCPC state
TCPC + iATVA
PediatricAdultPediatricAdult
SVC flow rate, LPM1.29 (0.005)1.78 (0.002)1.03 (0.0015)1.65 (0.001)
IVC flow rate, LPM2.2 (0.005)3.24 (0.0035)1.52 (0.0075)2.15 (0.0025)
Aortic pressure, mm Hg86.1 (18)96.2 (28)86.1 (17)98.1 (31)
Venous pressure, mm Hg14.0 (0.5)14.4 (1.1)11.4 (0.3)12.1 (0.4)
PA pressure—pump outlet, mm Hg14.1 (0.35)14.2 (0.65)

Mean and pulsatile amplitudes (in parenthesis) of the waveforms are presented. For the corresponding sample waveforms please see Figure 5. According to the experimental protocol, first the TCPC state is established and then the iATVA device is introduced leading the TCPC + iATVA hemodynamics. Values are provided for prototype 3. TCPC, Total cavopulmonary connection; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist; SVC, superior vena cava; LPM, liters per minute; IVC, inferior vena cava; PA, pulmonary artery.

Sample hemodynamic waveforms established for the single-ventricle (TCPC) state, with iATVA (right column) and without iATVA (left column), in the mock-up circuit. “Pump pressure” is measured at the outlet of the pump corresponding to the pulmonary artery pressure. Pediatric and adult Fontan hemodynamic conditions correspond to 3.5 and 5 liters per minute (LPM) of total cardiac output, respectively, and satisfy the corresponding SVC/IVC flow splits as stated in the text. Measurements correspond to iATVA prototype 3, which is connected to the system with a Y connector in between the IVC outlet and TCPC inlet. The pump is switched on by removing the clamps on the turbine inlet and pump inlet. Average hemodynamic values and waveforms established for the single-ventricle (TCPC) state (without iATVA) in the mock-up circuit are provided in Table 1. TCPC, Total cavopulmonary connection; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist; SVC/IVC, superior vena cava/inferior vena cava. Sample hemodynamic measurements obtained during the pulsatile mock-up single-ventricle flow loop experiments Mean and pulsatile amplitudes (in parenthesis) of the waveforms are presented. For the corresponding sample waveforms please see Figure 5. According to the experimental protocol, first the TCPC state is established and then the iATVA device is introduced leading the TCPC + iATVA hemodynamics. Values are provided for prototype 3. TCPC, Total cavopulmonary connection; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist; SVC, superior vena cava; LPM, liters per minute; IVC, inferior vena cava; PA, pulmonary artery. The decreased arterial pressure can also be regulated physiologically through increased cardiac output (increased heart rate and stroke volume), which is also tested in our mock-up circuit. As expected, these experiments indicate a better performance where the “main outcome” IVC pressure can be reduced by up to 8 mm Hg, compared with the TCPC state without venous assist (see Table E3). While regulating the CO, a slight increase in venous pressure due to intravascular volume increase would not alter the level of pressure decrease provided by the iATVA system at the venous side.
Table E3

Summary of hemodynamic measurements obtained during the pulsatile mock-up single-ventricle flow loop experiments

TCPC state–shuntTCPC + iATVA
Stroke column, mL6067606751
SVC flow rate, LPM1.1 (0.006)1.1 (0.002)1.02 (0.001)1.11 (0.01)0.88 (0.002)
IVC flow rate, LPM2.16 (0.001)2.16 (0.002)2.17 (0.001)2.27 (0.002)1.7 (0.002)
Aortic pressure, mm Hg94 (13)114 (18)96 (15)114 (19)71 (13)
Venous pressure, mm Hg18.6 (1.1)16.6 (1.0)10.8 (0.8)11.5 (0.8)10.5 (0.8)
PA pressure–pump outlet, mm Hg13.4 (0.9)9.8 (0.7)12.2 (0.8)12.9 (1.2)12.0 (0.6)

Here an alternative experimental protocol is used to study systemic pressure regulation through stroke volume adjustment instead of systemic vascular resistance modulation. The later mode is already presented in Table 1. In this experiment, the venous pump and the turbine is stopped using a thin wire catheter to represent the TCPC state–shunt. Removal of the wire allowed instantaneous switching to the venous support mode; TCPC + iATVA, without any change in aortic pressure, turbine flow (1.0-1.2 LPM), heart rate, stroke volume, or resistance adjustment (because the turbine shunt is operational, but producing no pump work due to the wire catheter at the TCPC state–shunt). According to the experimental protocol, first the TCPC state is established as in Table 1, and then the iATVA device with the thin wire that immobilizes the common shaft is introduced. This reduced the systemic pressure, which is adjusted back to the initial TCPC state levels by increasing the stroke volume (instead of SVR) leading to the TCPC state–shunt. Removal of the wire catheter resulted the TCPC + iATVA hemodynamics without changing the stroke volume where turbine power is now transferred to the pump side freely, and venous pressure decrease is recorded. This protocol is applied to 3 different stroke volumes. Values are provided for prototype 3 at constant heart rate (70 beats per minute) and correspond to pediatric physiological conditions with variable stroke volume. Mean and pulsatile amplitudes (in parenthesis) of the waveforms are presented. TCPC, Total cavopulmonary connection; iATVA, integrated aortic-turbine venous-assist; SVC, superior vena cava; LPM, liters per minute; IVC, inferior vena cava; PA, pulmonary artery.

Similarly, iATVA devices (versions P2 and P3) are tested at different turbine flow rates and the corresponding mean hemodynamic values are reported in Figure E3. Higher venous pressure decrease at the IVC (pump inlet) resulted due to increased aortic steal, for adult as well as pediatric conditions. However, a positive venous assist is also possible up to a turbine flow limit of approximately 0.9 LPM (18% aortic steal in adult) for the current prototype designs. For low aortic steal conditions, the flow leakage from the turbine side to the pump side becomes significant reaching 0.2 to 0.4 LPM, which degrades the turbine efficiency abruptly. Prototype P3 with additional turbine blades results in the highest ΔP at the design operating points; 2 mm Hg at 0.98 LPM (pediatric) and 2 mm Hg at 1.1 LPM (adult). This performance is equivalent to the Fontan pumps reported in the literature (Table E1). In Figure 6, all 3 iATVA prototypes are compared, which show improved performance as the design is evolved. As such, the impeller speed is shown to be an important index of system performance. Further results are provided in the section “Effect of Rotational Speed” in Appendix E1.
Figure E3

Venous pump flow (through the IVC) and venous pressure augmentation (ΔP) characteristics for iATVA prototype 2 (top chart) and prototype 3 (bottom chart) obtained from the pulsatile mock-up single-ventricle circulation flow loop. For both prototypes pediatric and adult operation modes corresponding to 3.5 and 5 LPM total cardiac output are tested, respectively (displayed in the red boxes). Average values of pulsatile waveforms are plotted after the iATVA is implanted in the single-ventricle circulation system. ΔP, Net venous pressure augmentation provided by the pump impeller; LPM, liters per minute.

Figure 6

Performance comparison of the 3 iATVA prototypes in pulsatile hemodynamic conditions generated in the single-ventricle mock-up flow loop. Results correspond to the adult Fontan hemodynamics at 5 LPM total cardiac output. Negative ΔP values are due to bearing leakage and insufficient aortic steal. Error bars are omitted for clarity because ΔP values between the pumps are statistically significant. ΔP, Net venous pressure augmentation provided by the pump impeller.

Performance comparison of the 3 iATVA prototypes in pulsatile hemodynamic conditions generated in the single-ventricle mock-up flow loop. Results correspond to the adult Fontan hemodynamics at 5 LPM total cardiac output. Negative ΔP values are due to bearing leakage and insufficient aortic steal. Error bars are omitted for clarity because ΔP values between the pumps are statistically significant. ΔP, Net venous pressure augmentation provided by the pump impeller.

Discussion

Delivery of the external power required to drive the mechanical assist devices is a formidable bioengineering challenge. Infections caused by the external power driveline are a major device-related complication of totally implanted mechanical assist devices. As such, for pediatric extracorporeal systems like the Berlin heart EXCOR (Berlin Heart GmbH, Berlin, Germany), similar infections are caused by the inlet/outlet tubes. It is significant to note that approximately 35% of pediatric ventricle support cases have resulted an infection-related complication as reported in PediMACS. Although a number of intraoperative remedies to reduce infection are proposed, the ultimate solution is to power ventricular assist devices wirelessly through the transcutaneous energy transfer. The major challenges of this approach include thermal tissue damage and unintended electromagnetic neural stimulation. Furthermore, poor power transmission efficiency has the potential to limit the hydrodynamic performance of ventricular assist. Cardiac assist systems that harvest the skeletal muscle power40, 41, 42 to drive an IVC cuff,43, 44 atrial cardiomyoplasty, or tissue-engineered beating TCPC conduits, can eliminate the need for external power. However, these systems also have poor power transmission efficiency and for any meaningful IVC support, require pacing systems and valves to synchronize with the venous pulsatility.47, 48 The proposed iATVA configuration addresses the need for external drive power through a novel alternative concept that particularly suits single-ventricle patients because of its passively controlled characteristics. On the basis of our current experiments with iATVA, for a typical Fontan circulation, it would be unlikely to demand further turbine power to drive the venous pump. Even if higher drive power is required, the aortic flow extraction budget of iATVA can be increased beyond 10% to 20%, on the basis of the current experience with the first stage systemic-to-pulmonary shuts that are routinely used in staged single-ventricle palliation. Depending on the disease template, aortic steal through these shunts can reach up to 50% of the CO.49, 50 Likewise, when a Fontan fenestration is used, up to 30% preload increases are common. Furthermore, for shunt as well as fenestration systems the available hydrodynamic energy is expanded without doing any useful work and with oxygen desaturation. Systemic desaturation at the venous side, as well as the uncontrolled shunt pressure/flow expansion, increases the risk of paradoxical emboli and stroke. In contrast, the aortic steal of iATVA is delivered to the atrium without influencing the oxygen saturation levels and thus reduces the risk of stroke. Furthermore, a more moderate, controlled expansion is achieved through the turbine compared with a traditional shunt. Although long-term aortic steal to drive the turbine can be considered as an additional burden for the single ventricle, there are cases in the literature in which pulmonary flow is very well tolerated spontaneously with age until 60 to 70 years, without any surgery. Considering the energy harvest possibility from the systemic-pulmonary shunts, it is also important to discuss the new arterial-to-venous pathway intended to augment the SVC flow at the Glenn stage.31, 52 In this system, high-pressure aortic flow expands to the venous pressure levels but without doing any turbine work, limiting its performance significantly. Compared with the iATVA device, the assisted-Glenn shunt configuration also steals a similar amount of aortic blood reaching 15% to 28%. Therefore, the iATVA system can be considered as a novel extension of pediatric systemic shunts by extracting useful energy from the aortic and venous pressure difference, with no oxygen desaturation or energy loss. This available energy is relocated to the venous side, a location where extra pumping energy is most needed to drive any type of venous assist device (centrifugal or axial) in the single-ventricle circulation passively. This in vitro study proves the feasibility of the iATVA configuration but major design improvements are possible for future prototypes. It is anticipated that the final version of implanted iATVA devices in animals or humans will be significantly different. For example, a double-inlet configuration collecting IVC as well as SVC flows into the pump through a Y-graft, and then delivers the venous blood to both PAs via a specially designed volute. This configuration would improve performance and result in an optimal default TCPC pathway in the event of turbine power failure (see Figure E1, Configuration C3, resembling an augmented 4-way TCPC), because the present calculations indicate that the theoretical available turbine head has the potential to support the entire venous return. Whereas for configuration C1 and C3, there is a risk of stroke as in the traditional left ventricle assist devices; this risk is mitigated in other configurations C2 and C4, in which the blood turbine bears almost the same risk as a systemic-to-pulmonary shunt. Using this alternative circuit configuration, given the passive nature of the iATVA system, instead of the traditional extracardiac TCPC, an “assisted-TCPC” can be implanted immediately as the third stage completion. Our experiments indicate that the iATVA system for Fontan physiology is a “turbine performance-limited” system and turbine-operating conditions pose a challenging turbomachinery problem. In particular, a more detailed volute design and volute-impeller interaction study must be conducted for assuring a higher efficiency. Likewise, the iATVA system is the first blood turbine proposed in the literature to our knowledge, and its blood damage and platelet activation characteristics pose an intriguing research problem, which need to be compared with the traditional pump side assist. It is expected that the thrombogenicity of the turbine side would be significantly different than the pump side. Whereas the iATVA system maintains significantly lower rotational speeds than the existing percutaneous ventricular assist devices, it might still require a higher dose of anticoagulants because it incorporates the venous as well as aortic systems. Steady-flow tests are generally shown to be parallel with the theoretical design predictions, but a detailed design focusing on frictional losses and turbine-to-pump leakage becomes evident for low aortic flow steal values reaching 0.5 LPM. Therefore, a new prototype that uses magnetic coupling (with total separation of systemic and venous blood) and higher-quality ultra-low friction ceramic bearings was developed in our laboratory. The initial in vitro tests of this prototype has produced encouraging results, which we plan to publish in the future. The flat characteristic response of the iATVA device (Figure 3) and its passive nature make it advantageous during off-design operation, compared with the traditional mechanical assist devices. For example, physical exercise would result in a positive effect on iATVA performance because of the sixfold increase in CO and a weaker heart rate and systemic pressure increase. One major failure mode is anticipated to be the turbine flow pathway blockage due to low aortic steal that can result in clotting. Such patients would require high-dose anticoagulation therapy. This failure mode was tested by clamping the turbine inflow and simultaneously fixing the shaft rotation in which the pump impeller did not cause a major obstruction to the freely-flowing IVC blood, whereby the hemodynamic parameters returned back to their TCPC state. For iATVA prototype 3, the pump-side pressure decrease for a freely rotating impeller is less than 3 mm Hg (with no turbine drive power), which increases to approximately 5 mm Hg when the impeller rotation is restricted fully, including the TCPC pathway flow resistance (see Table E3 for these mock-up system experiments). To meet the failsafe constraint of no obstruction in the event of device dysfunction, the pump-side free-flow (TCPC state) pressure decrease of the iATVA system can be reduced further through the origami-inspired retractable or foldable impellers.54, 55 In some patients, an acute Fontan failure is also anticipated after iATVA device implantation that can be recovered through an emergency mechanical assist (atrio-aortic) device application. Future research will determine whether the proposed concept will enable breakthrough postoperative management strategies for single-ventricle patients to control high SVP and also challenge the conventional staged-Fontan timing. In particular, the long-term use of the iATVA system to complement and support single-ventricle performance as a prophylactic strategy in asymptomatic Fontan patients to decrease the workload on the single ventricle and eliminate the venous remodeling, is also theoretically possible to extend the life of the ventricle and ultimately the patient. Thus, optimal iATVA timing does not have to correspond to the terminal stage of Fontan failure where the pulmonary vascular resistance is very high and CO needed to drive the turbine is low. Instead iATVA device implantation can be considered as soon as an elevated SVP is diagnosed, together with the initiation of protein-losing enteropathy and when plastic bronchitis symptoms are observed. Because of space problems, the present device size would fit children larger than 20 kg, by extending it approximately 2 cm over the TCPA graft (a total of 4 cm) toward the right pleura. Smaller-size devices are also theoretically feasible as presented in Figure E6.
Figure E6

Ideal characteristics of the iATVA system estimated from turbomachinery theory for 2 further miniaturized turbine impeller sizes of 20 and 30 mm. The total mechanical power transfer efficiency is 0.50; total cardiac output is 5 LPM; turbine aortic steal is 10% and inferior vena cava pump flow is 3.5 LPM.

Finally, we have shown that all components of the iATVA system can be manufactured through rapid prototyping, offering an inexpensive device alternative that has the potential to be customized for the individual patient and disease states and address the challenge of large patient-to-patient variation. In our experiments, we observe that a moderate level of venous pulsatility is generated at the PAs because of the systemic turbine impeller that fluctuates with the cardiac cycle. Future designs can specifically seek to improve pulsatile performance through stiffer outlets, which would be beneficial for healthy PA growth and remodeling.

Conclusions

This research study proposes a novel mechanical assist device for Fontan patients that does not require an external drive power. Turbomachinery theory and bench-top single-ventricle flow circuit data from evolving prototypes support the feasibility of this concept. Founded on the clinical experience with systemic shunts, the iATVA system requires minimal aortic steal, and uses this energy to generate the needed venous pressure reduction. Present prototypes require further improvements in leakage control, off-design operation (eg, high pulmonary vascular resistance), turbine drainage, and pulsatility. Intriguing research opportunities for the cardiovascular device community are identified by this study, including the thrombogenicity budget of the turbine section compared with a traditional “pump-only” percutaneous ventricular assist devices. Thus, the exciting iATVA system has the potential to passively reverse the detrimental effects of single-ventricle circulation and is expected to lead to further innovations in staged palliation of congenital heart disease management. The timing of iATVA system implantation is clinically precarious and strategies that optimize single-ventricle hemodynamics would likely reduce morbidity as well as mortality. Because the third-stage Fontan completion is typically performed at approximately 2 to 3 years of age, the available thoracic volume for device insertion might still be inadequate, even considering the potential benefits of the iATVA system. Therefore, clinicians can consider a new fourth stage for iATVA implantation to realize its optimal use. Many single-ventricle patients who have been surgically palliated with a modified Fontan operation eventually develop a low CO syndrome associated with systemic venous congestion resistant to medical management. Problematic atriopulmonary connection templates and pathway stenosis can otherwise be treated via surgical or catheterized TCPC conversion, providing approximately 1 to 3 mm Hg improvements in SVP, which is equivalent to a similar benefit that would be provided by a typical Fontan venous assist device, similar to the iATVA pump. There is also a small subgroup of “real” failed Fontan patients with high pulmonary vascular resistance, for whom the only treatment option is cardiac transplantation. There is also the possibility that the iATVA system can heal this small patient group in significant time before the terminal failed-state is reached, which requires further investigation.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support. Assembly process of a magnetically coupled integrated aortic-turbine venous assist device (iATVA) with ceramic bearings. The iATVA prototype supporting a single-ventricle circulation, in vitro demonstrated through an instrumented mock-up flow loop. Video available at: http://www.jtcvsonline.org/article/S0022-5223(18)30717-7/fulltext.
  59 in total

1.  Atrial cardiomyoplasty in a Fontan circulation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voss; Falk-Udo Sack; Werner Saggau; Siegfried Hagl; Rüdiger Lange
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Pulsatile venous waveform quality in Fontan circulation-clinical implications, venous assists options and the future.

Authors:  Ergin Koçyıldırım; Onur Dur; Ozlem Soran; Egemen Tüzün; Matthew W Miller; Greggory J Housler; Peter D Wearden; Theresa W Fossum; Victor O Morell; Kerem Pekkan
Journal:  Anadolu Kardiyol Derg       Date:  2012-05-16

3.  Rescue cardiac transplantation for failing staged palliation in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs; James Anthony Quintessenza; Paul J Chai; Harald L Lindberg; Alfred Asante-Korang; Jorge McCormack; Gul Dadlani; Robert J Boucek
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.093

4.  Successful implantation of a Berlin heart biventricular assist device in a failing single ventricle.

Authors:  Meena Nathan; Christopher Baird; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Christopher Almond; Ravi Thiagarajan; Peter Laussen; Elizabeth Blume; Frank Pigula
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Intraoperative positioning to prevent driveline insulation from acting as a conduit for left ventricular assist device pocket infection.

Authors:  John Entwistle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia.

Authors:  F Fontan; E Baudet
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 7.  Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Steven G Chopski; William B Moskowitz; Randy M Stevens; Amy L Throckmorton
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.094

8.  In vitro evaluation of an external compression device for fontan mechanical assistance.

Authors:  John Valdovinos; Eugene Shkolyar; Gregory P Carman; Daniel S Levi
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.094

9.  Outcomes of children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: First analysis of the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS).

Authors:  Elizabeth D Blume; David N Rosenthal; Joseph W Rossano; J Timothy Baldwin; Pirooz Eghtesady; David L S Morales; Ryan S Cantor; Jennifer Conway; Angela Lorts; Christopher S Almond; David C Naftel; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  A 74-year-old unoperated univentricular heart: the oldest reported survival.

Authors:  Valentina Gesuete; Marianna Fabi; Marco Bonvicini
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.093

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current spectrum, challenges and new developments in the surgical care of adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jürgen Hörer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  Complications and management of functional single ventricle patients with Fontan circulation: From surgeon's point of view.

Authors:  Jianrui Ma; Jimei Chen; Tong Tan; Xiaobing Liu; Rong Liufu; Hailong Qiu; Shuai Zhang; Shusheng Wen; Jian Zhuang; Haiyun Yuan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 3.  Failures of the Fontan System in Univentricular Hearts and Mortality Risk in Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Horacio Márquez-González; Jose Gustavo Hernández-Vásquez; Montserrat Del Valle-Lom; Lucelli Yáñez-Gutiérrez; Miguel Klünder-Klünder; Eduardo Almeida-Gutiérrez; Solange Gabriela Koretzky
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.