| Literature DB >> 29665793 |
Cyril Cyrus1, Samir Al-Mueilo2, Chittibabu Vatte3, Shahanas Chathoth3, Yun R Li4, Hatem Qutub2,5, Rudaynah Al Ali2, Fahad Al-Muhanna2, Matthew B Lanktree6, Khaled Riyad Alkharsah3, Abdullah Al-Rubaish2, Brian Kim-Mozeleski4, Brendan Keating4, Amein Al Ali3,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genome wide association studies of patients with European descent have identified common variants associated with risk of reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A panel of eight variants were selected to evaluate their association and prevalence in a Saudi Arabian patient cohort with chronic kidney disease (CKD).Entities:
Keywords: CST3; Chronic kidney disease; Genetic biomarkers; MYH9; SHROOM3; SLC7A9; SNP
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29665793 PMCID: PMC5905143 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-0890-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Baseline characteristics
| CKD Cases | Control |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| N of subjects | 160 | 189 | |
| Age (years) | 47.7 ± 17.3 | 32.1 ± 10.5 | < 0.0005* |
| Sex M (%) | 85 (53%) | 145 (77%) | < 0.0005¥ |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.7 ± 6.7 | 27.9 ± 8.8 | 0.824* |
| Vitamin D3 (ng/ml) | 22.3 ± 12.7 | 28.9 ± 6.4 | < 0.0005* |
| FGF23 (pg/ml) | 485.6 ± 802.6 | 39.4 ± 14.9 | < 0.0005* |
| T2D (%) | 57 (35.6%) | 8 (4.2%) | 0.0001¥ |
| HTN (%) | 37 (23.1%) | 11 (5.8%) | 0.0001¥ |
¥two-tailed Fisher’s exact test; * Students t test
Fig. 1Significant associations in Saudi CKD patients were revealed in eight of ten measured biochemical analytes stratified across CKD, ESRD, Type 2 Diabetes, and hypertension. a One-way ANOVA analysis of clinical analytes were evaluated for statistical significance across measured CKD comorbidities. Serum calcium and vitamin D were not significant. b Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test of Vitamin D and FGF23 between healthy and CKD disease states. Significance is noted as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA)
Prevalence and effect of CKD risk alleles in Saudi Arabians and CKDGen
| Saudis | CKDGen | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | SNP | Freq | OR (95% CI) | P | Freq | Beta | P |
|
| rs9992101 | 0.26 | 0.89 (0.64–1.24) | 0.5 | 0.42 | −0.011 | 7.1 × 10−32 |
| rs17319721 | 0.26 | 0.78 (0.56–1.12) | 0.14 | 0.42 | −0.011 | 1.3 × 10−37 | |
|
| rs4805834 | 0.16 | 1.07 (0.72–1.61) | 0.7 | 0.15 | 0.0064 | 2.0 × 10−7 |
|
| rs4821480 | 0.24 | 1.69 (1.22–2.36) | 0.002 | N/A | ||
| rs4821481 | 0.25 | 0.87 (0.62–1.22) | 0.43 | N/A | |||
| rs2032487 | 0.25 | 0.87 (0.62–1.22) | 0.43 | N/A | |||
| rs3752462 | 0.25 | 0.96 (0.72–1.30) | 0.8 | 0.33 | −0.0007 | 9.2 × 10−4 | |
|
| rs13038305 | 0.46 | 1.42 (0.94–2.12) | 0.09 | 0.26 | 0.0011 | 0.05 |
Odds ratio (OR) is used to quantify the presence of analyzed genes (column 1) with each population (Saudi, CKDGen). Beta is the standardized regression coefficient from CKDGen
Multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate improvement in CKD stage classification provided by CKD risk alleles
| Model | Variables | AUC (95% CI) |
| Difference in AUC versus Model 1 | P versus Model 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 (Clinical) | Age & Gender | 0.80 (0.75–0.84) | < 0.0001 | ||
| Model 2 (Clinical + Biochemical) | Age & Gender + FGF23 + Vitamin D3 | 0.92 (0.89–0.95) | < 0.0001 | 0.12 | 0.0003 |
| Model 3 (Clinical + Biochemical + Genetic) | Age & Gender + FGF23 + Vitamin D3 + rs4821480 + rs4821481 | 0.93 (0.90 to 0.95) | < 0.0001 | 0.13 | 0.0001 |
| Model 4 (Clinical + Biochemical + Genetic) | Age & Gender + FGF23 + Vitamin D3 + rs4821480 | 0.93 (0.89 to 0.95) | < 0.0001 | 0.13 | 0.0001 |