Predictors, therapeutic options and long-term outcome of abrupt reclosure.

To ascertain the clinical and procedural factors that relate to the occurrence and management of abrupt reclosure, data on 1,160 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angioplasty between December 1981 and December 1986 were analyzed. Abrupt reclosure occurred in 54 patients (4.7%), developing during the dilatation procedure in 43 patients (80%) and delayed by 11 +/- 2 hours after the procedure in 11 patients (20%). Patients were divided into 3 groups based on subsequent management: (1) 22 patients (40%) in whom the involved vessel was reopened by additional dilatation, (2) 14 patients (26%) in whom the involved vessel was not reopened but the patient was treated medically, and (3) 18 patients (33%) in whom abrupt reclosure was managed by emergency bypass surgery, yielding an overall emergency surgery rate of 1.6%. Patients whose abrupt reclosure was reopened were more likely to have luminal thrombus (54 vs 28%) and less likely to have extensive local dissection after dilatation (14 vs 61%; p less than 0.025) than patients undergoing emergency surgery. Patients treated medically despite continued vessel occlusion were more likely to have collateral blood flow to the occluded zone (54 vs 11%, p less than 0.01) than patients undergoing surgery. While 10 of 18 patients (56%) undergoing emergency surgery sustained a myocardial infarction, all patient subgroups appeared to do well during long-term follow-up.