Literature DB >> 29665579

Correction: Measurements agreement between low-cost and high-level handheld 3D scanners to scan the knee for designing a 3D printed knee brace.

Yoann Dessery, Jari Pallari.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190585.].

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29665579      PMCID: PMC5903878          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Table 3 is incorrect. Please see the corrected Table 3 here.
Table 3

Agreement between iSense and EVA scanners.

Comparing the absolute and relative means of the three iSense scan measurements (N = 14) and means of the three EVA scan measurements (N = 14), limits of agreement, coefficient of repeatability within methods and uniformity of the data for each section of the lower limb going from 300mm below the mid-patella (0mm) to 180mm above the mid-patella.

iSense vs EVA
Sections (mm)Aver. circ. in mmAbs. mean diff. in mm (SE)Rel. mean diff. in % (SE)95% Limit of Agreement (Mean ± 1.96SD)Repeatability iSS/EVA
Abs. Lower ‒ Abs. Upper (mm)Rel. Lower ‒ Rel. Upper (%)Abs. SE (mm)/Rel. SE (%)
180523.910.2 (2.6)2.0 (0.5)-8.2 ‒ 28.6-1.6 ‒ 5.518.1/0.78.6/6.0
150498.49.3 (2.4)1.9 (0.5)-8.3 ‒ 26.8-1.7 ‒ 5.515.5/0.77.8/5.3
120468.49.1 (2.3)2.0 (0.5)-7.7 ‒ 25.9-1.7 ‒ 5.614.3/0.77.3/4.8
90440.710.6 (2.0)2.5 (0.5)-4.3 ‒ 25.5-1.0 ‒ 5.910.7/0.67.4/5.3
60420.513.4 (1.9)3.2 (0.5)-0.6 ‒ 27.3-0.3 ‒ 6.78.4/0.58.4/7.1
30409.213.5 (1.9)3.3 (0.5)-0.5 ‒ 27.5-0.2 ‒ 6.99.1/0.67.9/5.6
0394.211.4 (2.1)2.9 (0.5)-4.3 ‒ 27.0-1.1 ‒ 6.911.5/0.78.7/5.9
-30371.213.5 (2.1)3.7 (0.6)-2.0 ‒ 29.1-0.5 ‒ 7.812.1/0.97.7/3.6
-60365.918.4 (2.1)5.0 (0.6)3.0 ‒ 33.80.8 ‒ 9.211.4/0.99.0/3.0
-90378.419.6 (2.4)5.2 (0.6)2.3 ‒ 36.80.6 ‒ 9.714.4/1.09.9/3.5
-120390.617.8 (2.3)4.6 (0.6)1.3 ‒ 34.40.3 ‒ 8.813.2/0.99.6/3.8
-150391.314.7 (2.2)3.8 (0.6)-1.5 ‒ 31.0-0.5 ‒ 8.112.8/0.99.3/3.8
-180377.112.2 (2.7)3.3 (0.8)-7.3 ‒ 31.6-2.2 ‒ 8.718.8/1.59.9/4.7
-210350.710.9 (3.1)3.2 (0.9)-11.5 ‒ 33.3-3.6 ‒ 10.025.5/2.410.2/5.2
-240320.811.2 (3.3)3.6 (1.1)-13.3 ‒ 35.7-4.5 ‒ 11.730.8/3.410.8/5.3
-270292.412.6 (3.4)4.4 (1.3)-12.7 ‒ 37.8-4.8 ‒ 13.632.7/4.411.3/5.0
-300267.814.7 (3.7)5.6 (1.5)-12.6 ‒ 41.9-5.3 ‒ 16.438.6/6.211.6/4.5

Aver., average; circ., circumference; abs., absolute; diff., difference; SE, 95% confidence interval; rel., relative; iSS, iSense

A positive bias or limits of agreement indicates that measurements from iSense scanner overestimates the value in respect to EVA scanner.

Agreement between iSense and EVA scanners.

Comparing the absolute and relative means of the three iSense scan measurements (N = 14) and means of the three EVA scan measurements (N = 14), limits of agreement, coefficient of repeatability within methods and uniformity of the data for each section of the lower limb going from 300mm below the mid-patella (0mm) to 180mm above the mid-patella. Aver., average; circ., circumference; abs., absolute; diff., difference; SE, 95% confidence interval; rel., relative; iSS, iSense A positive bias or limits of agreement indicates that measurements from iSense scanner overestimates the value in respect to EVA scanner.
  1 in total

1.  Measurements agreement between low-cost and high-level handheld 3D scanners to scan the knee for designing a 3D printed knee brace.

Authors:  Yoann Dessery; Jari Pallari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.