Literature DB >> 29665570

From resilience thinking to Resilience Planning: Lessons from practice.

M M Sellberg1, P Ryan2, S T Borgström3, A V Norström4, G D Peterson4.   

Abstract

Resilience thinking has frequently been proposed as an alternative to conventional natural resource management, but there are few studies of its applications in real-world settings. To address this gap, we synthesized experiences from practitioners that have applied a resilience thinking approach to strategic planning, called Resilience Planning, in regional natural resource management organizations in Australia. This case represents one of the most extensive and long-term applications of resilience thinking in the world today. We conducted semi-structured interviews with Resilience Planning practitioners from nine organizations and reviewed strategic planning documents to investigate: 1) the key contributions of the approach to their existing strategic planning, and 2) what enabled and hindered the practitioners in applying and embedding the new approach in their organizations. Our results reveal that Resilience Planning contributed to developing a social-ecological systems perspective, more adaptive and collaborative approaches to planning, and that it clarified management goals of desirable resource conditions. Applying Resilience Planning required translating resilience thinking to practice in each unique circumstance, while simultaneously creating support among staff, and engaging external actors. Embedding Resilience Planning within organizations implied starting and maintaining longer-term change processes that required sustained multi-level organizational support. We conclude by identifying four lessons for successfully applying and embedding resilience practice in an organization: 1) to connect internal "entrepreneurs" to "interpreters" and "networkers" who work across organizations, 2) to assess the opportunity context for resilience practice, 3) to ensure that resilience practice is a learning process that engages internal and external actors, and 4) to develop reflective strategies for managing complexity and uncertainty.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Adaptive governance; Adaptive management; Australia; Natural resource management; Practitioner perceptions; Transformation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29665570     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  1 in total

1.  Coastal Land Use Management Methodologies under Pressure from Climate Change and Population Growth.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Juliana Barrett
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.644

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.