Literature DB >> 29665507

Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membrane fouling by natural organic matter: Mechanisms and mitigation by pre-ozonation and pH.

Wenzheng Yu1, Teng Liu2, John Crawshaw3, Ting Liu2, Nigel Graham4.   

Abstract

The fouling of ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes during the treatment of surface waters continues to be of concern and the particular role of natural organic matter (NOM) requires further investigation. In this study the effect of pH and surface charge on membrane fouling during the treatment of samples of a representative surface water (Hyde Park recreational lake) were evaluated, together with the impact of pre-ozonation. While biopolymers in the surface water could be removed by the UF membrane, smaller molecular weight (MW) fractions of NOM were poorly removed, confirming the importance of membrane pore size. For NF membranes the removal of smaller MW fractions (800 Da-10 kDa) was less than expected from their pore size; however, nearly all of the hydrophobic, humic-type substances could be removed by the hydrophilic NF membranes for all MW distributions (greater than 90%). The results indicated the importance of the charge and hydrophilic nature of the NOM. Thus, the hydrophilic NF membrane could remove the hydrophobic organic matter, but not the hydrophilic substances. Increasing charge effects (more negative zeta potentials) with increasing solution pH were found to enhance organics removal and reduce fouling (flux decline), most likely through greater membrane surface repulsion. Pre-ozonation of the surface water increased the hydrophilic fraction and anionic charge of NOM and altered their size distributions. This resulted in a decreased fouling (less flux decline) for the UF and smaller pore NF, but a slight increase in fouling for the larger pore NF. The differences in the NF behavior are believed to relate to the relative sizes of ozonated organic fractions and the NF pores; a similar size of ozonated organic fractions and the NF pores causes significant membrane fouling.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fouling; Humic acid; Nanofiltration; Ozonation; Surface water; Ultrafiltration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29665507     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  2 in total

1.  Comparing the performance of various nanofiltration membranes in advanced oxidation-nanofiltration treatment of reverse osmosis concentrates.

Authors:  Na Li; Xiaoyan Wang; Hui Zhang; Zijian Zhang; Jincheng Ding; Jie Lu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Impact of Pre-Ozonation during Nanofiltration of MBR Effluent.

Authors:  Zoulkifli Amadou-Yacouba; Julie Mendret; Geoffroy Lesage; François Zaviska; Stephan Brosillon
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.