Literature DB >> 29665454

Comparison of the mechanobiological performance of bone tissue scaffolds based on different unit cell geometries.

Óscar L Rodríguez-Montaño1, Carlos Julio Cortés-Rodríguez2, Antonio E Uva3, Michele Fiorentino3, Michele Gattullo3, Giuseppe Monno3, Antonio Boccaccio4.   

Abstract

Enhancing the performance of scaffolds for bone regeneration requires a multidisciplinary approach involving competences in the fields of Biology, Medicine and Engineering. A number of studies have been conducted to investigate the influence of scaffolds design parameters on their mechanical and biological response. The possibilities offered by the additive manufacturing techniques to fabricate sophisticated and very complex microgeometries that until few years ago were just a geometrical abstraction, led many researchers to design scaffolds made from different unit cell geometries. The aim of this work is to find, based on mechanobiological criteria and for different load regimes, the optimal geometrical parameters of scaffolds made from beam-based repeating unit cells, namely, truncated cuboctahedron, truncated cube, rhombic dodecahedron and diamond. The performance, -expressed in terms of percentage of the scaffold volume occupied by bone-, of the scaffolds based on these unit cells was compared with that of scaffolds based on other unit cell geometries such as: hexahedron and rhombicuboctahedron. A very intriguing behavior was predicted for the truncated cube unit cell that allows the formation of large amounts of bone for low load values and of very small amounts for the medium-high ones. For high values of load, scaffolds made from hexahedron unit cells were predicted to favor the formation of the largest amounts of bone. In a clinical context where medical solutions become more and more customized, this study offers a support to the surgeon in the choice of the best scaffold to be implanted in a patient-specific anatomic region.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beam-based scaffolds; Bone tissue engineering; Diamond; Mechanobiology; Rhombic dodecahedron; Truncated cube; Truncated cuboctahedron; Unit cell

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29665454     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  5 in total

1.  Mechanobiological Approach to Design and Optimize Bone Tissue Scaffolds 3D Printed with Fused Deposition Modeling: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Gianluca Percoco; Antonio Emmanuele Uva; Michele Fiorentino; Michele Gattullo; Vito Modesto Manghisi; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  Challenges in computational fluid dynamics applications for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Tiago Pires; John W C Dunlop; Paulo Rui Fernandes; André P G Castro
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  The Promotion of Mechanical Properties by Bone Ingrowth in Additive-Manufactured Titanium Scaffolds.

Authors:  Changning Sun; Enchun Dong; Jiayu Chen; Jibao Zheng; Jianfeng Kang; Zhongmin Jin; Chaozong Liu; Ling Wang; Dichen Li
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-08-26

Review 4.  Advances in Tissue Engineering and Innovative Fabrication Techniques for 3-D-Structures: Translational Applications in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Federica Rey; Bianca Barzaghini; Alessandra Nardini; Matteo Bordoni; Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti; Cristina Cereda; Manuela Teresa Raimondi; Stephana Carelli
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 7.666

5.  An Algorithm to Optimize the Micro-Geometrical Dimensions of Scaffolds with Spherical Pores.

Authors:  Óscar Libardo Rodríguez-Montaño; Carlos Julio Cortés-Rodríguez; Antonio Emmanuele Uva; Michele Fiorentino; Michele Gattullo; Vito Modesto Manghisi; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.