Literature DB >> 29665090

Lung allocation score: the Eurotransplant model versus the revised US model - a cross-sectional study.

Jacqueline M Smits1, George Nossent2, Patrick Evrard3, György Lang4, Christiane Knoop5, Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp6, Frank Langer7, Rene Schramm8, Ed van de Graaf6, Robin Vos9, Geert Verleden9, Benoit Rondelet10, Daniel Hoefer11, Rogier Hoek12, Konrad Hoetzenecker4, Tobias Deuse13, Agita Strelniece1, Dave Green1, Erwin de Vries1, Undine Samuel1, Guenther Laufer14, Roland Buhl15, Christian Witt16, Jens Gottlieb17,18.   

Abstract

Both Eurotransplant (ET) and the US use the lung allocation score (LAS) to allocate donor lungs. In 2015, the US implemented a new algorithm for calculating the score while ET has fine-tuned the original model using business rules. A comparison of both models in a contemporary patient cohort was performed. The rank positions and the correlation between both scores were calculated for all patients on the active waiting list in ET. On February 6th 2017, 581 patients were actively listed on the lung transplant waiting list. The median LAS values were 32.56 and 32.70 in ET and the US, respectively. The overall correlation coefficient between both scores was 0.71. Forty-three per cent of the patients had a < 2 point change in their LAS. US LAS was more than two points lower for 41% and more than two points higher for 16% of the patients. Median ranks and the 90th percentiles for all diagnosis groups did not differ between both scores. Implementing the 2015 US LAS model would not significantly alter the current waiting list in ET.
© 2018 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allocation; lung transplantation; waiting list

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29665090     DOI: 10.1111/tri.13262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  7 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Paradigms in Bioengineering the Lungs.

Authors:  Raxshanaa Mohgan; Mayuren Candasamy; Jayashree Mayuren; Sachin Kumar Singh; Gaurav Gupta; Kamal Dua; Dinesh Kumar Chellappan
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-01

2.  Performance Changes Following the Revision of Organ Allocation System of Lung Transplant: Analysis of Korean Network for Organ Sharing Data.

Authors:  Hye Ju Yeo; Do Hyung Kim; Yun Seong Kim; Doosoo Jeon; Woo Hyun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Spirometry testing for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) bridge to transplant patients.

Authors:  Irina Timofte; Montserrat Diaz-Abad; Fahid Alghanim; Jordan Assadi; Christine Lau; Ronson Madathil; Bartley Griffith; Daniel Herr; Aldo Iacono; Stella Hines
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-03

4.  Waiting List Dynamics and Lung Transplantation Outcomes After Introduction of the Lung Allocation Score in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Thijs W Hoffman; Aline C Hemke; Pieter Zanen; Bart Luijk; Rogier A S Hoek; Erik A M Verschuuren; Diana A van Kessel
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-09-07

Review 5.  Lung transplantation: a review of the optimal strategies for referral and patient selection.

Authors:  Alicia B Mitchell; Allan R Glanville
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

Review 6.  Timing it right: the challenge of recipient selection for lung transplantation.

Authors:  Henry W Ainge-Allen; Allan R Glanville
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

7.  Lung transplantation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter experience.

Authors:  Anna E Frick; Christiaan T Gan; Robin Vos; Stefan Schwarz; Felix Kraft; Daria Kifjak; Arne P Neyrinck; Dirk E Van Raemdonck; Walter Klepetko; Peter Jaksch; Erik A M Verschuuren; Konrad Hoetzenecker
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 9.369

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.