Literature DB >> 29665054

Does 'hacking' surface type affect equine forelimb foot placement, movement symmetry or hoof impact deceleration during ridden walk and trot exercise?

A Barstow1,2, J Bailey2, J Campbell2, C Harris2, R Weller1,2, T Pfau1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both pleasure and competition horses regularly exercise on surfaces such as tarmac, gravel and turf during 'hacking'. Despite this, there is limited evidence relating to the effect of these surfaces upon foot-surface interaction.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate forelimb foot placement, hoof vibration and movement symmetry in pleasure horses on three commonly encountered hacking surfaces. STUDY
DESIGN: Quantitative gait study in a convenience sample.
METHODS: Six horses regularly partaking in hacking exercise were ridden in walk and trot on all surfaces. Horses were equipped with one hoof-mounted, accelerometer and four body-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) to measure foot impact and movement symmetry. High-speed (400 FPS) video footage of foot-placement was acquired (dorsal, palmar, lateral views). Foot-impact and movement symmetry were analysed with a mixed effects model and Bowker symmetry tests for foot-placement analysis.
RESULTS: Vibration power and frequency parameters increase as perceived surface firmness increases from grass, to gravel, to tarmac (P≤0.001). Vibration power parameters were consistently greater at trot compared with walk (P≤0.001), but the same was not true for vibration frequency (P≥0.2). Greatest movement asymmetry was recorded during grass surface trotting. No significant difference in foot-placement was detected between the three surfaces. MAIN LIMITATIONS: This was a field study using three commonly encountered hacking surfaces. Surface properties change easily with water content and temperature fluctuations so care must be taken when considering other similar surfaces, especially at different times of the year. Six leisure horses were used so the results may not be representative of horses of all types.
CONCLUSIONS: Vibration parameters generally increase as perceived surface firmness increases. Increasing speed alters vibration power but not frequency. Further investigations are required to determine the role that this may play in the development of musculoskeletal disease in horses.
© 2018 EVJ Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometer; gait analysis; hacking; horse; impact; surface

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29665054     DOI: 10.1111/evj.12952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  4 in total

1.  The effect of horseshoes and surfaces on horse and jockey centre of mass displacements at gallop.

Authors:  Kate Horan; Kieran Kourdache; James Coburn; Peter Day; Henry Carnall; Dan Harborne; Liam Brinkley; Lucy Hammond; Sean Millard; Bryony Lancaster; Thilo Pfau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Reining Quarter Horses during Trot In-Hand, on the Lunge and during Ridden Exercise.

Authors:  Thilo Pfau; W Michael Scott; Tabitha Sternberg Allen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Hoof Impact and Foot-Off Accelerations in Galloping Thoroughbred Racehorses Trialling Eight Shoe-Surface Combinations.

Authors:  Kate Horan; James Coburn; Kieran Kourdache; Peter Day; Henry Carnall; Liam Brinkley; Dan Harborne; Lucy Hammond; Mick Peterson; Sean Millard; Thilo Pfau
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Linear Discriminant Analysis for Investigating Differences in Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Horses before/after Diagnostic Analgesia in Relation to Expert Judgement.

Authors:  Thilo Pfau; David M Bolt; Andrew Fiske-Jackson; Carolin Gerdes; Karl Hoenecke; Lucy Lynch; Melanie Perrier; Roger K W Smith
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.