Ahmed Eissa1,2, Ahmed Elsherbiny1,2, Rafael F Coelho3, Jens Rassweiler4, John W Davis5, Francesco Porpiglia6, Vipul R Patel7, Napoleone Prandini8, Salvatore Micali2, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi2, Stefano Puliatti2, Bernardo Rocco9, Giampaolo Bianchi2. 1. Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. 2. Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. 3. Department of Urology, Institute of Cancer of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heilbronn, Germany. 5. Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. 7. Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital Celebration Health, University of Central Florida School of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA. 8. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. 9. Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy - bernardo.rocco@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer is one of the major challenges facing urologists. Biochemical recurrence is not rare and occurs in up to one third of the patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Management of biochemical recurrence is tailored according to the site and the burden of recurrence. Therefore, developing an imaging technique to early detect recurrent lesions represents an urgent need. Positron emission tomography (PET) of 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) is an emerging imaging modality that seems to be a promising tool with capability to localize recurrent prostate cancer. A systematic review of literature was done to evaluate the role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after primary radical treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic and comprehensive review of literature was performed in September 2017 analyzing the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The following key terms were used for the search "PSMA," "prostate-specific membrane antigen," "positron emission tomography," "PET," "recurrent," "prostate cancer," "prostate neoplasm," "prostate malignancy," and "68Ga." Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirty-seven articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis of this systematic review. Of the 37 articles selected for analysis only four studies were prospective. The overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA PET scan ranged from 47% up to 96.6%. The main advantage of this imaging technique is its relatively high detection rates at low serum PSA levels below 0.5 ng/mL (ranging from 11.1% to 75%). Higher serum PSA level was strongly associated with increased positivity on 68Ga-PSMA PET scan. 68Ga-PSMA PET scan was found superior to conventional imaging techniques (CT and MRI) in this setting of patients and even it seems to outperform choline-based PET scan. This technique provided significant changes in the therapeutic management of 28.6-87.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: After biochemical recurrence, the primary goal is to locate the recurrent lesions' site. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT seems to be effective in identifying recurrence localization also for very low levels of PSA (<0.5 ng/mL) thus permitting to choose the best therapeutic strategy as early as possible. However, data available cannot be considered exhaustive and prospective randomized trials are needed.
INTRODUCTION: Recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer is one of the major challenges facing urologists. Biochemical recurrence is not rare and occurs in up to one third of the patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Management of biochemical recurrence is tailored according to the site and the burden of recurrence. Therefore, developing an imaging technique to early detect recurrent lesions represents an urgent need. Positron emission tomography (PET) of 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) is an emerging imaging modality that seems to be a promising tool with capability to localize recurrent prostate cancer. A systematic review of literature was done to evaluate the role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after primary radical treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic and comprehensive review of literature was performed in September 2017 analyzing the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The following key terms were used for the search "PSMA," "prostate-specific membrane antigen," "positron emission tomography," "PET," "recurrent," "prostate cancer," "prostate neoplasm," "prostate malignancy," and "68Ga." Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirty-seven articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis of this systematic review. Of the 37 articles selected for analysis only four studies were prospective. The overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA PET scan ranged from 47% up to 96.6%. The main advantage of this imaging technique is its relatively high detection rates at low serum PSA levels below 0.5 ng/mL (ranging from 11.1% to 75%). Higher serum PSA level was strongly associated with increased positivity on 68Ga-PSMA PET scan. 68Ga-PSMA PET scan was found superior to conventional imaging techniques (CT and MRI) in this setting of patients and even it seems to outperform choline-based PET scan. This technique provided significant changes in the therapeutic management of 28.6-87.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: After biochemical recurrence, the primary goal is to locate the recurrent lesions' site. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT seems to be effective in identifying recurrence localization also for very low levels of PSA (<0.5 ng/mL) thus permitting to choose the best therapeutic strategy as early as possible. However, data available cannot be considered exhaustive and prospective randomized trials are needed.
Authors: Daniela A Ferraro; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Urs J Muehlematter; Daniel Eberli; Julian Müller; Alexander Müller; Roger Gablinger; Helmut Kranzbühler; Aurelius Omlin; Philipp A Kaufmann; Thomas Hermanns; Irene A Burger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Haneen Amawi; Alaa A A Aljabali; Sai H S Boddu; Sadam Amawi; Mohammad A Obeid; Charles R Ashby; Amit K Tiwari Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Lino M Sawicki; Julian Kirchner; Carolin Buddensieck; Christina Antke; Tim Ullrich; Lars Schimmöller; Johannes Boos; Christoph Schleich; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Christian Buchbender; Philipp Heusch; Robert Rabenalt; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Hans-Wilhelm Müller; Hubertus Hautzel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Julian Müller; Daniela A Ferraro; Urs J Muehlematter; Helena I Garcia Schüler; Sarah Kedzia; Daniel Eberli; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie G C Kroeze; Tullio Sulser; Daniel M Schmid; Aurelius Omlin; Alexander Müller; Thomas Zilli; Hubert John; Helmut Kranzbuehler; Philipp A Kaufmann; Gustav K von Schulthess; Irene A Burger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sascha Kaufmann; Stephan Kruck; Sergios Gatidis; Tobias Hepp; Wolfgang M Thaiss; Jörg Hennenlotter; Johannes Schwenck; Marcus Scharpf; Konstantin Nikolaou; Arnulf Stenzl; Gerald Reischl; Christian la Fougère; Jens Bedke Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Falk Gühne; Stefanie Radke; Thomas Winkens; Christian Kühnel; Julia Greiser; Philipp Seifert; Robert Drescher; Martin Freesmeyer Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2021-12-22