PURPOSE: To validate the well-known and often-used impression replica technique for measuring fit between a preparation and a crown in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The validation consisted of three steps. First, a measuring instrument was validated to elucidate its accuracy. Second, a specimen consisting of male and female counterparts was created and validated by the measuring instrument. Calculations were made for the exact values of three gaps between the male and female. Finally, impression replicas were produced of the specimen gaps and sectioned into four pieces. The replicas were then measured with the use of a light microscope. The values received from measuring the specimen were then compared with the values received from the impression replicas, and the technique was thereby validated. RESULTS: The impression replica technique overvalued all measured gaps. Depending on location of the three measuring sites, the difference between the specimen and the impression replicas varied from 47 to 130 μm. CONCLUSION: The impression replica technique overestimates gaps within the range of 2% to 11%. The validation of the replica technique enables the method to be used as a reference when testing other methods for evaluating fit in dentistry.
PURPOSE: To validate the well-known and often-used impression replica technique for measuring fit between a preparation and a crown in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The validation consisted of three steps. First, a measuring instrument was validated to elucidate its accuracy. Second, a specimen consisting of male and female counterparts was created and validated by the measuring instrument. Calculations were made for the exact values of three gaps between the male and female. Finally, impression replicas were produced of the specimen gaps and sectioned into four pieces. The replicas were then measured with the use of a light microscope. The values received from measuring the specimen were then compared with the values received from the impression replicas, and the technique was thereby validated. RESULTS: The impression replica technique overvalued all measured gaps. Depending on location of the three measuring sites, the difference between the specimen and the impression replicas varied from 47 to 130 μm. CONCLUSION: The impression replica technique overestimates gaps within the range of 2% to 11%. The validation of the replica technique enables the method to be used as a reference when testing other methods for evaluating fit in dentistry.
Authors: Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw; Shu-Min Hsu; Ana C Bohórquez; Nader Abdulhameed; Gary W Scheiffele; Mijin Kim; Dan Neal; John Chai; Fan Ren Journal: Clin Exp Dent Res Date: 2020-09-21