Peter C Keil1, Nicole Lindenberg2, Christoph L Lassen2, Bernhard M Graf2, Jens Meier3, Christoph H Wiese2,4. 1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4020, Linz, Österreich. peter.keil@gmx.at. 2. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93051, Regensburg, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz, Krankenhausstraße 9, 4020, Linz, Österreich. 4. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital Braunschweig, Leipziger Straße 24, 38124, Braunschweig, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypnosis is probably one of the oldest therapies known to man. In the last decades modern hypnosis has mainly been used by psychotherapists; however, hypnosis is becoming increasingly more important as a therapeutic method in medicine. Hypnosis can be used for a variety of medical indications. In the literature there is much evidence for the effectiveness of hypnosis. The aim of the present investigation was to demonstrate the effectiveness of hypnosis in inpatient treatment of chronic pain patients and to present a self-hypnosis program, which can be easily integrated into pain therapy. METHODS: From October 2012 to April 2013 all inpatient chronic pain patients were included (group 1: non-hypnosis group, group 2: hypnosis group). Concerning group 2 a standardized protocol for hypnotherapy was integrated in addition to the standardized pain management program. The main goal of hypnotherapy was to integrate a self-hypnosis training so that further implementation in a domestic setting could be guaranteed. By means of standardized test procedures, e. g. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pain and general well-being, data were evaluated before and after the pain therapy. RESULTS: The prestandardized and poststandardized test procedures of 30 chronic pain patients were evaluated (17 patients without hypnosis, 13 patients with hypnosis). The main diagnosis according to ICD-10 was "chronic pain disorder" (F45.41) with a MPSS stage III in all patients. The PDI was significantly improved in the hypnosis group (p = 0.019). The other items all showed a trend towards improvement in the hypnosis group (exception GAD-7) but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: In a small patient collective, the present investigation was able to show that the integration of modern hypnotherapy into the treatment of chronic pain patients in an inpatient setting can be another useful therapeutic aspect. In particular, the instructions for learning independently seem to be useful due to the limited in-patient time. More research needs to be carried out to support our initial findings.
BACKGROUND: Hypnosis is probably one of the oldest therapies known to man. In the last decades modern hypnosis has mainly been used by psychotherapists; however, hypnosis is becoming increasingly more important as a therapeutic method in medicine. Hypnosis can be used for a variety of medical indications. In the literature there is much evidence for the effectiveness of hypnosis. The aim of the present investigation was to demonstrate the effectiveness of hypnosis in inpatient treatment of chronic painpatients and to present a self-hypnosis program, which can be easily integrated into pain therapy. METHODS: From October 2012 to April 2013 all inpatient chronic painpatients were included (group 1: non-hypnosis group, group 2: hypnosis group). Concerning group 2 a standardized protocol for hypnotherapy was integrated in addition to the standardized pain management program. The main goal of hypnotherapy was to integrate a self-hypnosis training so that further implementation in a domestic setting could be guaranteed. By means of standardized test procedures, e. g. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pain and general well-being, data were evaluated before and after the pain therapy. RESULTS: The prestandardized and poststandardized test procedures of 30 chronic painpatients were evaluated (17 patients without hypnosis, 13 patients with hypnosis). The main diagnosis according to ICD-10 was "chronic pain disorder" (F45.41) with a MPSS stage III in all patients. The PDI was significantly improved in the hypnosis group (p = 0.019). The other items all showed a trend towards improvement in the hypnosis group (exception GAD-7) but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: In a small patient collective, the present investigation was able to show that the integration of modern hypnotherapy into the treatment of chronic painpatients in an inpatient setting can be another useful therapeutic aspect. In particular, the instructions for learning independently seem to be useful due to the limited in-patient time. More research needs to be carried out to support our initial findings.
Authors: P Layer; V Andresen; C Pehl; H Allescher; S C Bischoff; M Classen; P Enck; T Frieling; S Haag; G Holtmann; M Karaus; S Kathemann; J Keller; R Kuhlbusch-Zicklam; W Kruis; J Langhorst; H Matthes; H Mönnikes; S Müller-Lissner; F Musial; B Otto; C Rosenberger; M Schemann; I van der Voort; K Dathe; J C Preiss Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: M Schiltenwolf; U Eidmann; V Köllner; T Kühn; M Offenbächer; F Petzke; M Sarholz; M Weigl; B Wolf; W Häuser Journal: Schmerz Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.107