| Literature DB >> 29662965 |
Mahmoud Mohammadi1, Touraj Farazmandfar1, Majid Shahbazi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a condition associated with systemic disorders in the mother and the fetus. However, the exact causes of preeclampsia are unknown, but several genetics and environmental factors play role in development of this disease. Major histocompatibility complex role is very important during pregnancy through which the fetus is not rejected by mother's immune system.Entities:
Keywords: Genotyping; HLA-DQ; Preeclampsia
Year: 2017 PMID: 29662965 PMCID: PMC5893932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Biomed ISSN: 2476-3772
The used primers in this study
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLA-DQA1*0102 | Forward | CTGACCACGTTGCCTCTTGT | 248 | 58 | NG_032876.1 |
| Reverse | ATTGGTAGCAGCGGTAGAGTT | ||||
| HLA-DQB1*0602 | Forward | TCCCCGCAGAGGATTTCGTGT | 294 | 57 | NG_029922.1 |
| Reverse | TGCAGGGCGACGACGCTCACCTCTCC | ||||
| GAPDH | Forward | GATGCTGGCGCTGAGTACGTCG | 587 | 65 | NG_007073.2 |
| Reverse | GAGGAGACCACCTGGTGCTCAG | ||||
Figure 1Electrophoresis pattern of PCR products for detection of HLA-DQA1*0102/HLA-DQB1*0602 polymorphism. Band 248 bp presents allele HLA-DQA1*0102. Therefore, column 1 is a negative sample, and column 2 is a positive sample. Band 296 bp presents allele HLA-DQA1*0602. Therefore, column 3 is a negative sample, and column 4 is a positive sample. M, DNA marker; Band 248 bp presents the amplified GAPDH, as control bond
Comparison of the frequency of preeclampsia cases and healthy controls based on age and ethnicity
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (yr) | ||||||
| 16-25 | 38 (3.3) | 42 (3.9) | 1.39 (0.83-2.30) | 0.241 | ||
| 26-35 | 101 (94.5) | 155 (95.6) | Ref | |||
| 36-45 | 26 (2.2) | 31 (0.5) | 1.29 (0.72–2.31) | 0.453 | ||
| Ethnic groups | ||||||
| Fars | 94 (51.9) | 105 (46.1) | Ref | |||
| Turkman | 31 (17.1) | 26 (11.4) | 1.33 (0.73-2.41) | 0.346 | ||
| Sistani | 46 (25.5) | 85 (37.3) | 0.60 (0.38-0.95) | 0.031 | ||
| Others | 10 (5.5) | 12 (5.2) | 0.93 (0.38-2.25) | 1.000 | ||
Comparison analysis was done by Chi-square test.
Data presented as n (%)
N: number
OR: odds ratio
CI: confidence interval
Ref: reference.
The allelic and genotypic distribution of HLA-DQA1*0102/HLA-DQB1*0602 polymorphism in case group and control group
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLA-DQA1*0102 | ||||||
| Positive | 112 (61.9) | 136 (59.6) | Ref | |||
| Negative | 69 (38.1) | 92 (40.4) | 0.91 (0.61-1.35) | 0.684 | ||
| HLA-DQB1*0602 | ||||||
| Positive | 137 (75.7) | 210 (92.1) | Ref | |||
| Negative | 44 (24.3) | 18 (7.9) | 3.74 (2.07-6.75) | < 0.001 | ||
| Genotypes (0102/0602) | ||||||
| Positive/Positive | 91 (50.3) | 129 (56.6) | Ref | |||
| Positive/Negative | 21 (11.6) | 7 (3.1) | 4.25 (1.73–10.43) | < 0.001 | ||
| Negative/Positive | 46 (25.4) | 81 (35.5) | 0.80 (0.51-1.26) | 0.364 | ||
| Negative/Negative | 23 (12.7) | 11 (4.8) | 2.96 (1.38-6.38) | 0.005 | ||
Comparison analysis was done by Chi-square test.
Data presented as n (%)
N: number
OR: odds ratio
CI: confidence interval
Ref: reference.
The association analysis of allele HLA-DQA1*0102 with preeclampsia in ethnic groups of Golestan province in northern Iran
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Persian | ||||
| Control | 35 (33.3) | 70 (66.7) | Ref | 0.146 |
| Case | 41 (43.6) | 53 (56.4) | 1.55 (0.87-2.75) | |
| Torkman | ||||
| Control | 14 (53.9) | 12 (46.1) | Ref | 0.792 |
| Case | 15 (48.4) | 16 (51.6) | 0.80 (0.28-2.28) | |
| Sistani | ||||
| Control | 31 (36.5) | 54 (63.5) | Ref | 0.850 |
| Case | 18 (39.1) | 28 (60.9) | 1.12 (0.53-2.34) | |
| Other groups | ||||
| Control | 3 (25.0) | 9 (75.0) | Ref | 0.651 |
| Case | 4 (40.0) | 6 (60.0) | 2.00 (0.32-12.30) | |
Comparison analysis was done by Chi-square test.
Data presented as n (%)
N: number
OR: odds ratio
CI: confidence interval
Ref: reference.
The association analysis of allele HLA-DQB1*0602 with preeclampsia in ethnic groups of Golestan province in northern Iran
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Fars | ||||
| Control | 10 (9.5) | 95 (90.5) | Ref | 0.028 |
| Case | 20 (21.3) | 74 (78.7) | 2.57 (1.13-5.82) | |
| Torkman | ||||
| Control | 4 (15.4) | 22 (84.6) | Ref | 0.741 |
| Case | 6 (19.4) | 25 (80.6) | 1.32 (0.33-5.30) | |
| Sistani | ||||
| Control | 7 (8.2) | 78 (91.8) | Ref | 0.151 |
| Case | 8 (17.4) | 38 (82.6) | 2.35 (0.79-6.95) | |
| Others | ||||
| Control | 4 (33.3) | 8 (66.7) | Ref | 1.000 |
| Case | 3 (30.0) | 7 (70.0) | 0.86 (0.14-5.23) | |
Comparison analysis was done by Chi-square test.
Data presented as n (%)
N: number
OR: odds ratio
CI: confidence interval
Ref: reference.