Literature DB >> 29662617

Premature ovarian aging in BRCA carriers: a prototype of systemic precocious aging?

Irit Ben-Aharon1,2, Mattan Levi3, David Margel1,2, Rinat Yerushalmi1,2, Shulamith Rizel1, Shlomit Perry1,2, Eran Sharon4,2, Noa Hasky3, Ronit Abir5,2, Benny Fisch5,2, Ana Tobar6, Ruth Shalgi3, Salomon Marcello Stemmer1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Though former evidence implies a correlation of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation with reduced ovarian reserve, the data is yet inconsistent. Our aim was to investigate biomarkers of ovarian aging in a cohort of young healthy carriers of the BRCA mutation. We hypothesized that the role played by BRCA genes in aging pathways is not exclusive to the ovary. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Healthy female BRCA carriers, 40 years or younger and healthy male BRCA carriers, 50 years or younger, were enrolled in the study. Serum anti-mullerian Hormone (AMH), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), Klotho and IL-1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Ovarian AMH and protein kinase B (AKT) mRNA from BRCA carriers who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy and from age-matched, healthy, non-carriers who underwent partial oophorectomy due to benign conditions were analyzed by qPCR.
RESULTS: Thirty-three female (median age 35y) and 20 male (44y) BRCA carriers were enrolled into the study and matched to control non-carriers (34y and 43y, respectively). Serum AMH level was significantly lower in BRCA female carriers than in both non-carrier controls and age-matched nomograms. The levels of ovarian AMH and AKT mRNA were significantly lower in carriers than in controls. The systemic aging cytokines FGF-23, klotho and IL-1 displayed a differential expression in carriers of both genders. FGF-23 level was higher in carriers (P=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a link between BRCA mutation, accelerated ovarian aging and systemic aging-related pathophysiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; ovarian aging; systemic precocious aging

Year:  2018        PMID: 29662617      PMCID: PMC5882308          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Germline mutations in the two known breast cancer susceptibility genes; breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and 2 (BRCA2), predispose their carriers to a higher lifetime-risk of breast and ovarian cancers [1-4]. Other cancers, which have been shown to be associated with BRCA1/2 mutations, include male breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and melanoma [5-7]. Although the exact role of these genes in carcinogenesis has been extensively studied and is still being explored, existing data suggest that they play a key role in DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), chromosomal stability, apoptosis and cell cycle. DSBs are most lethal form of DNA damage and had been associated with promoted aging through a variety of molecular and cellular end points, including genome structural variations, cellular senescence, and apoptosis, which may result in neurodegeneration, cancer, loss of regenerative capacity, and inflammation [8]. Mice with homozygous deletions of either BRCA1 or BRCA2 display higher levels of cellular senescence and apoptosis and are embryonically lethal [9-10], additionally BRCA1+/− p53+/− mice displayed multiple premature aging phenotypes, such as osteoporosis, atrophy, kyphosis, decreased body weight, and increased tumor incidence [11]. It has been recently indicated, that female carriers of BRCA mutation have lower ovarian reserve, tendency to experience premature menopause, increased ovarian aging, decreased AMH level and lower ovarian response to ovarian stimulation than non-carriers [12-16]. A subsequent preclinical study indicated that the expression of key DSBs repair genes – BRCA1, MRE11, Rad51 and ATM, but not BRCA2, decline in mouse and human oocytes. The reproductive capacity of BRCA1-deficient mice was impaired, the count of primordial follicles was low, and DSBs in the remaining follicles were increased with age, more than in wild type mice [17]. In contrast, Valentini et al. [18] found that BRCA carriers and non-carriers did not differ in the rate of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea. Due to the unsolved controversy regarding the link between BRCA mutation status and accelerated ovarian aging [19], our aim was to examine serum and ovarian biomarkers for ovarian aging in young BRCA mutation carriers. We hypothesized that BRCA role in aging is not restricted to the ovary; and therefore, looked also for systemic aging biomarkers in a population of young BRCA carries, both females and males.

RESULTS

Ovarian aging in BRCA mutation female carriers

Thirty-three female BRCA carriers (median age 35y) and 20 male carriers (44y) were enrolled and matched to 15 non-carrier females (34y) and 16 non-carrier males (43y) as depicted in Table 1. All patients were healthy, BMI 18-22 with background of neither cardiovascular diseases nor comorbidities. Serum AMH served as an indicator of ovarian reserve in females [20] and of testicular toxicity in males [21]. AMH measurement have clinical advantage over measurements of other markers of ovarian aging, such as inhibin B, estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which are all menstrual cycle dependent and mark only late ongoing process of primordial follicle pool depletion [20]. We have shown that serum AMH may serve as marker for testicular function after induced toxicity, whereas other groups demonstrated age dependent serum AMH reduction that may serve as marker for testicular aging and age-related reducing of testicular function [22-24]. Percentiles of AMH levels in females were determined according to AMH-nomograms of Tehrani et al. [25]. AMH amount was significantly lower in female BRCA carriers than in female non-carrier controls and continue to decrease with age (Figure 1; P<0.05). Interestingly, AMH level was similar in BRCA carriers and non-carriers (supplementary Figure 1; P>0.05). Next we examined ovarian tissues obtained from BRCA carriers and age-matched healthy non-carrier controls by H&E staining and morphometric analysis. BRCA carriers showed fewer primordial, primary, secondary and antral follicles in ovaries of than in non-carriers (Figure 2A–2C; P<0.05;). Moreover, the levels of AKT and AMH mRNAs as indicators of cell survival and proliferation [26] and of ovarian reserve [20], respectively, were significantly lower in ovaries of BRCA carriers than in non-carriers (Figure 2C; P<0.05).
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics

ParticipantParticipant statusAge
1Female carrier36
2Female carrier33
3Female carrier29
4Female carrier30
5Female carrier37
6Female carrier24
7Female carrier26
8Female carrier36
9Female carrier38
10Female carrier32
11Female carrier35
12Female carrier37
13Female carrier32
14Female carrier33
15Female carrier38
16Female carrier34
17Female carrier32
18Female carrier37
19Female carrier25
20Female carrier26
21Female carrier34
22Female carrier36
23Female carrier32
24Female carrier34
25Female carrier31
26Female carrier39
27Female carrier32
28Female carrier39
29Female carrier36
30Female carrier32
31Female carrier34
32Female carrier36
33Female carrier36
1Female non-carrier35
2Female non-carrier36
3Female non-carrier33
4Female non-carrier33
5Female non-carrier35
6Female non-carrier27
7Female non-carrier29
8Female non-carrier35
9Female non-carrier33
10Female non-carrier36
11Female non-carrier35
12Female non-carrier32
13Female non-carrier38
14Female non-carrier37
15Female non-carrier35
1Male carrier42
2Male carrier46
3Male carrier46
4Male carrier45
5Male carrier46
6Male carrier48
7Male carrier44
8Male carrier48
9Male carrier42
10Male carrier47
11Male carrier42
12Male carrier44
13Male carrier42
14Male carrier40
15Male carrier43
16Male carrier42
17Male carrier40
18Male carrier47
19Male carrier45
20Male carrier42
1Male non-carrier41
2Male non-carrier44
3Male non-carrier42
4Male non-carrier45
5Male non-carrier43
6Male non-carrier46
7Male non-carrier39
8Male non-carrier48
9Male non-carrier47
10Male non-carrier41
11Male non-carrier43
12Male non-carrier44
13Male non-carrier46
14Male non-carrier41
15Male non-carrier40
16Male non-carrier43

Gender, status of genetic carrying of BRCA mutation and age of 84 participants in study.

Figure 1

Serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in BRCA mutation female carriers

(A) Scatter plot representing serum AMH levels in 15 non-carrier females (control; white dots; dashed grey regression line) and 33 BRCA mutation carrier females (BRCA; grey dots; continues black regression line). (B) Age, serum AMH concentration and AMH levels percentiles in non-carrier females (control; light gray bars) and BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Each bar is mean ±SEM. * significantly different from corresponding control value (P<0.05).

Figure 2

Characteristics of ovaries excised from female BRCA carriers

(A-B) Excised female ovaries were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); follicles were divided into three main categories according to their size and developmental stage: primordial, primary, secondary and antral follicles. Follicles were counted according to category, in at least two transverse ovarian sections for each female [21]. The number of each type of ovarian follicle per mm2 of ovary was recorded and presented as percentage of follicular density in control non-carriers group (A; Each bar is mean ± SEM. * significantly different from corresponding control value P<0.05) or as percentage of total follicles in each group (B; number of follicles/mm2 is presented in each slice). (C) Representative images of H&E stained ovaries excised from non-carrier (control) and from BRCA-carrier patients (BRCA). Bar = 100 μm. (D) Levels of AKT and AMH mRNAs in ovaries of non-carriers (control; light gray bars) and BRCA-carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Bars are mean ± SEM. * significantly different from corresponding control value (P<0.05).

Gender, status of genetic carrying of BRCA mutation and age of 84 participants in study.

Serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in BRCA mutation female carriers

(A) Scatter plot representing serum AMH levels in 15 non-carrier females (control; white dots; dashed grey regression line) and 33 BRCA mutation carrier females (BRCA; grey dots; continues black regression line). (B) Age, serum AMH concentration and AMH levels percentiles in non-carrier females (control; light gray bars) and BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Each bar is mean ±SEM. * significantly different from corresponding control value (P<0.05).

Characteristics of ovaries excised from female BRCA carriers

(A-B) Excised female ovaries were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); follicles were divided into three main categories according to their size and developmental stage: primordial, primary, secondary and antral follicles. Follicles were counted according to category, in at least two transverse ovarian sections for each female [21]. The number of each type of ovarian follicle per mm2 of ovary was recorded and presented as percentage of follicular density in control non-carriers group (A; Each bar is mean ± SEM. * significantly different from corresponding control value P<0.05) or as percentage of total follicles in each group (B; number of follicles/mm2 is presented in each slice). (C) Representative images of H&E stained ovaries excised from non-carrier (control) and from BRCA-carrier patients (BRCA). Bar = 100 μm. (D) Levels of AKT and AMH mRNAs in ovaries of non-carriers (control; light gray bars) and BRCA-carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Bars are mean ± SEM. * significantly different from corresponding control value (P<0.05).

Systematic aging in BRCA mutation female carriers

We measured systemic aging biomarkers in BRCA carriers in order to examine possible involvement of BRCA in systemic aging. FGF-23 is a key molecule regulating mineral homeostasis and vascular calcification and is its concentration in serum is correlated with aging [27]. Hence, the concentration of FGF-23, known to increase with age [27], was initially examined. The median concentration of FGF-23 was higher in BRCA carriers of both genders than in the control group, though nearly significant (P=0.06 CI), possibly because of high variability. Because there are no established cut-off values for the level of serum FGF-23 we normalized the level of FGF in the serum to the median in our cohort. The distribution range of FGF-23 values among carriers was significantly different in BRCA-carriers and non-carriers. Only one non-carrier had an FGF-23 level higher than 75th percentile, whereas 8 BRCA-carriers depicted outlier values (p=0.04; Pearson Chi-Square test; Figure 3B). The same phenomenon was demonstrated after we performed the same analysis but stratified the subjects by gender (p=0.047; Pearson Chi-Square test). We also examined other systemic aging biomarkers such as serum Il-1A that increases with age and emerges as an important participant in aging [21] and serum Klotho that decreases with age and takes part in many systemic aging processes that also affect lifespan [28]. The level of IL-1A was higher in BRCA-carriers than in their corresponding controls (Figure 4A), whereas Klotho level was lower in BRCA-carriers than in their corresponding controls (Figure 4B). Yet, the differences in Klotho levels in carriers were not significant according to independent, two-sample two-tailed t-test for unequal sample sizes and unequal variances (P>0.05; It was found to be significant in one-tail and equal variances t-test).
Figure 3

Serum fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) in BRCA mutation carriers

(A) Bar chart of serum FGF-23 concentration in non-carrier females and males (control; light gray bars) and BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Each bar is mean ± SEM. (B) Box plot of serum FGF-23 concentration in non-carriers (control; females and males) or BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA) normalized to the median in the cohort. Outliers are marked in asterisk or circle with the sample number.

Figure 4

Serum interleukin 1 alpha (Il-1A) and Klotho in BRCA mutation carriers

Bar charts of serum Il-1A (A) and Klotho (B) concentrations in non-carriers (control; light gray bars) and BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Each bar is mean ± SEM.

Serum fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) in BRCA mutation carriers

(A) Bar chart of serum FGF-23 concentration in non-carrier females and males (control; light gray bars) and BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Each bar is mean ± SEM. (B) Box plot of serum FGF-23 concentration in non-carriers (control; females and males) or BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA) normalized to the median in the cohort. Outliers are marked in asterisk or circle with the sample number.

Serum interleukin 1 alpha (Il-1A) and Klotho in BRCA mutation carriers

Bar charts of serum Il-1A (A) and Klotho (B) concentrations in non-carriers (control; light gray bars) and BRCA mutation carriers (BRCA; dark gray bars). Each bar is mean ± SEM.

DISCUSSION

Our study sheds light on the emerging controversy regarding the role BRCA gene plays in the ovary, regardless of its role in the development of ovarian and other malignancies. We demonstrated that young BRCA carriers have lesser ovarian reserve than age-matched non-carriers. Other studies indicated that BRCA mutation carriers experience early menopause [15–16, 29]. A contradictory study performed by Valentini [18] determined that the risk of induced long-term amenorrhea does not seem to be greater among BRCA carriers than non-carriers. To note, menstruation may not be the finest indicator of ovarian reserve and may be affected by other conditions. Titus et al. [17] revealed that the function of BRCA1 and other key DNA repair genes in oocytes declines significantly with age in mice and woman, and when BRCA is knocked out by gene interference in mice, it stimulates apoptosis and diminishes ovarian reserve, indicating that the efficiency of DNA DSBs repair is a key effector in oocyte demise. Our results of ovarian aging in humans, assessed by follicles count, serum AMH level, and expression of AMH and AKT, are in accordance with recent study showing primordial follicle loss in humans, possibly because of oocyte DNA damage in women with BRCA mutations [30]. We speculate that the general DNA damage in general and DNA double stand break in particular may also accumulate in somatic cells in the ovary and other organs and may lead to general pathologies such as systematic aging. The link between ovarian function and aging has been well established. Menopause transition has been correlated with aging and increased risk of future cardiovascular morbidity [31-33]. AMH, which is established as a reliable marker of ovarian reserve, was found also to be reciprocally correlated with impaired lipid profile, where women in the lowest baseline age-specific AMH quartile exhibited a worsening lipid profile compared to women in the highest AMH quartile [34-35]. Nevertheless, there is still controversy regarding the magnitude of the cardiovascular risk and AMH levels in healthy adults [20, 36–37]. Another Mechanism that supports the link between diminished ovarian reserve and aging is supported by the observation that woman with shorter telomeres and reduced telomerase activity have lesser ovarian reserve [38]. Moreover, Meta-analysis of 13 loci associated with age at menopause revealed that these gene loci were related to DNA repair, an important contributor to somatic aging [39]. It has been recently shown that BRCA gene products have a role in telomere length homeostasis in healthy BRCA carriers [40]. We presumed that ovarian aging might reflect a broader systemic phenomenon evaluated whether BRCA carriers and non-carriers differ in their expression pattern of aging-related factors, as FGF-23, IL-1A and Klotho. Assessment of systemic aging is considered highly challenging. The range of laboratory values and wide variability among subjects is a known Achilles’ heel. While FGF, Klotho and IL1 may serve as standard surrogate biomarkers for systemic aging [21, 27–28] other well-established markers may also serve for such purpose. Since ovarian aging may contribute to systemic somatic aging, we also included male BRCA carriers in our analysis to exclude ovarian effect. We observed a remarkable trend of increased median FGF-23 levels in the serum of BRCA carriers (of both genders), compared to age-matched non-carriers. Klotho levels in both genders were lower in the serum of BRCA carriers than in non-carriers, though they did not reach statistical significance. The levels of IL-1A in the serum depicted a reciprocal pattern: higher in BRCA carriers, though due to high variability it also did not reach statistical significance. Limited by small sample size, the patterns yielded in our study were very obvious, yet not clearly significant, hampered by high variability. Aging is also characterized by increased cardiovascular risk, due to endothelial dysfunction via increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus elevating oxidative stress that in turn promotes DNA damage and endothelial cell apoptosis [41]. It had been recently demonstrated that BRCA mutation carriers had increased risk of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in both mouse and human [41, 42]. The pre-clinical data obtained in mice highlight an unrecognized role of BRCA as a gatekeeper of inflammation-induced endothelial cell function and a target to limit atherosclerosis [43-46]. BRCA1 is expressed in endothelial cells in mice and overexpression of BRCA1 strongly attenuated the production of ROS and AKT. Moreover, a Canadian study estimated that in the absence of melanoma, breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancers, the life expectancy of female and male BRCA carriers was 6.8 and 3.7 years lower than that of non-carriers, respectively [47]. An overall test of association for men and women together showed a statistically significant association between BRCA1/2 mutations and increased non-cancer mortality, complementing our data. In conclusion, our results lend credence to a newly paradigm, that suggests a potential link between BRCA mutation, accelerated gonadal aging and systemic aging-related pathophysiology. Because DNA damage and repair plays an essential role in carcinogenesis, it also represents a common contributor for aging-related conditions characterized by increased cellular and oxidative stress manifested by DNA damage. Thus, BRCA carriers may be predisposed to enhanced aging, potential endothelial dysfunction and related vascular morbidity. Future studies should elucidate this hypothesis and appraise the prevalence of non-cancer morbidities in BRCA carriers, as these data may carry a significant implication for preventive and early detection measures for this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental design in patients

Study participants were healthy BRCA carriers; 33 females, 40 years or younger, before prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) and 20 males, 50 years or younger. Control cohorts were consisted of age-matched healthy non-carriers of each gender (15 females and 16 males). The protocol was approved by Rabin Medical Center (RMC) institutional review board (RMC-6103) and all patients signed a relevant informed consent form. Blood samples were drawn from both genders for hormones and cytokines measurements. Ovarian tissue obtained from BRCA carriers who underwent PO, and from age-matched healthy non-carriers, who underwent partial oophorectomy due to benign conditions, were processed for histological and gene expression analyses.

Measurements of serum hormones and cytokines

Blood samples were centrifuged (6000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C) and serum was stored in aliquots at −20°C until measurements. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH; Beckman Coulter, Chaska, MN, USA), fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23; Immutopics, San Clemente, CA, USA), interleukin 1 alpha (Il-1A; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Klotho (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Calibrators for a standard-curve as well as low and high controls were added in duplicates to each ELISA plate. Samples were measured by the SpectraMax 190 microplate-reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Histological staining and morphometric analysis of ovaries

Ovaries were fixed in 4%; paraformaldehyde (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), embedded in paraffin, sectioned (8 μm) and mounted on Superfrost/Plus slides (Daigger and Co., Wheeling, IL, USA). Several transverse sections from each ovary were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)[48]. Bright-field images were recorded by a digital-camera (Canon pc1089 CCD, Tokyo, Japan) connected to an Axiovert 200M inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging; Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an Apochromat 20X objective. Primordial, primary, secondary and antral follicles amount was counted as previously described [21] in at least two transverse ovarian sections for each female. Assessments of the ovaries were performed by two independent evaluators, clinical pathologist and clinical embryologist and histology expert (level of agreement was higher than 50%). The number of each type of ovarian follicle per mm2 of ovary was recorded and presented as percentage of follicular density in control group. The total volume of the ovaries was not assessed.

Ovarian gene expression analysis by qPCR

Purification of total RNA from formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded microdissected ovarian tissue was made by RNeasy-FFPE kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Ovarian mRNA was quantified [21]; first-strand cDNA was created by RT (Applied biosystems, Foster City, California) in 35 cycles with 0.4 μM gene-specific primers using ready-mix mixture (Sigma). mRNA amount were assessed by SYBR green reagent (SYBR Green PCR Master Mix, ABI, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on an ABI Prism 7900 Sequence PCR machine. In each run, 20 ng of cDNA per reaction were used as an amplification template. The house-keeping gene selected for the qPCR calibration was hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT1). The primers used were as follows: human HPRT1 forward 5’ TGA CAC TGG CAA AAC AAT GCA 3’; human HPRT1 reverse 5’ GGT CCT TTT CAC CAG CAA GCT 3’; human Protein kinase B (AKT) forward 5’ ACG TGG CTA TTG TGA AGG AG 3’; human AKT reverse 5’ CAT TCT TGA GGA GGA AGT AGC G 3’; human AMH forward 5’ CAG TTG CTA GTC CTA CAT CTG GCT GA 3’; human AMH reverse 5’ GGA AGT CCA CGG TTA GCA CCA AAT 3’. Data was recorded and analyzed by StepOne 2.1 software (Applied biosystems).

Statistical analysis

Data of serum AMH, Il-1A and Klotho levels, follicular count and mRNA levels was evaluated by independent, two-sample two-tailed t-test for unequal sample sizes and unequal variances with significance of P < 0.05. A correlated one-way ANOVA statistical analysis showed similar results. Data of detected or undetected serum FGF-23 levels was also evaluated by Pearson Chi-square test.

Statement of significance

BRCA carriers may be potentially predisposed to enhanced aging.
  47 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage, aging, and cancer.

Authors:  Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Lipid profiles and ovarian reserve status: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Hadi Erfani; Leila Cheraghi; Maryam Tohidi; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Frequency of premature menopause in women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Amy Finch; Adriana Valentini; Ellen Greenblatt; Henry T Lynch; Parviz Ghadirian; Susan Armel; Susan L Neuhausen; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Nadine Tung; Beth Karlan; William D Foulkes; Ping Sun; Steven Narod
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Age-specific serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: estimates from a large population-based sample.

Authors:  F R Tehrani; M A Mansournia; M Solaymani-Dodaran; F Azizi
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.005

5.  Ovarian Aging in Women With BRCA Germline Mutations.

Authors:  Wayne Lin; Shiny Titus; Fred Moy; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by Rad51 in mice lacking Brca2.

Authors:  S K Sharan; M Morimatsu; U Albrecht; D S Lim; E Regel; C Dinh; A Sands; G Eichele; P Hasty; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  BRCA Mutations, DNA Repair Deficiency, and Ovarian Aging.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Volkan Turan; Shiny Titus; Robert Stobezki; Lin Liu
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Correlation of telomere length and telomerase activity with occult ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Samantha Butts; Harold Riethman; Sarah Ratcliffe; Alka Shaunik; Christos Coutifaris; Kurt Barnhart
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  BRCA1 is an essential regulator of heart function and survival following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Praphulla C Shukla; Krishna K Singh; Adrian Quan; Mohammed Al-Omran; Hwee Teoh; Fina Lovren; Liu Cao; Ilsa I Rovira; Yi Pan; Christine Brezden-Masley; Bobby Yanagawa; Aanika Gupta; Chu-Xia Deng; John G Coles; Howard Leong-Poi; William L Stanford; Thomas G Parker; Michael D Schneider; Toren Finkel; Subodh Verma
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Lack of association between a functional variant of the BRCA-1 related associated protein (BRAP) gene and ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Yi-Chu Liao; Hsiu-Fen Lin; Yuh-Cherng Guo; Chung-Hung Chen; Zhi-Zhang Huang; Suh-Hang Hank Juo; Ruey-Tay Lin
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The Emerging Key Role of Klotho in the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis.

Authors:  Tingting Xie; Wenting Ye; Jing Liu; Lili Zhou; Yali Song
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  The Impact of BRCA1- and BRCA2 Mutations on Ovarian Reserve Status.

Authors:  Drechsel Katja C E; van Tilborg Theodora C; Eijkemans Marinus J C; Lentjes Eef G W M; Homminga Irene; Goddijn Mariette; van Golde Ron J T; Verpoest Willem; Lichtenbelt Klaske D; Broekmans Frank J M; Bos Anna M E
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and ovarian aging.

Authors:  Volkan Turan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Association of Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants With Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient-Level Data.

Authors:  Volkan Turan; Matteo Lambertini; Dong-Yun Lee; Erica Wang; Florian Clatot; Beth Y Karlan; Isabelle Demeestere; Heejung Bang; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 50.717

5.  Bone health after RRBSO among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: a population-based study.

Authors:  Helena Abreu do Valle; Paramdeep Kaur; Janice S Kwon; Rona Cheifetz; Lesa Dawson; Gillian E Hanley
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.756

6.  Anti-HER2/neu Antibody Reduces Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Toxicity-From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Mattan Levi; Tal Goshen-Lago; Rinat Yerushalmi; Tal Granot; Salomon M Stemmer; Ruth Shalgi; Irit Ben-Aharon
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2020-12-07

Review 7.  Breaking the aging epigenetic barrier.

Authors:  Sweta Sikder; Ganesan Arunkumar; Daniël P Melters; Yamini Dalal
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 8.  Splicing alterations in healthy aging and disease.

Authors:  Brittany Lynn Angarola; Olga Anczuków
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 9.957

9.  Protective effects of mangafodipir against chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in mice.

Authors:  Ying Qin; Akira Iwase; Tomohiko Murase; Chiharu Ishida; Nao Kato; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Tomomi Kotani; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Effects of fasting on the expression pattern of FGFs in different skeletal muscle fibre types and sexes in mice.

Authors:  Wei-Hua Jia; Nuo-Qi Wang; Lin Yin; Xi Chen; Bi-Yu Hou; Jin-Hua Wang; Gui-Fen Qiang; Chi Bun Chan; Xiu-Ying Yang; Guan-Hua Du
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.027

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.