Tina Schubert1, Steffen Rausch1, Omar Fahmy2, Georgios Gakis1, Arnulf Stenzl3. 1. Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 2. Department of Urology, University Putra Malaysia (UPM), Selangor, Malaysia. 3. Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For over 100 years white-light cystoscopy has remained the gold-standard technique for the detection of bladder cancer (BCa). Some limitations in the detection of flat lesions (CIS), the differentiation between inflammation and malignancy, the inaccurate determination of the tumor margin status as well as the tumor depth, have led to a variety of technological improvements. The aim of this review is to evaluate the impact of these improvements in the diagnosis of BCa and their effectiveness in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA statement to identify studies reporting on imaging modalities in the diagnosis of NMIBC between 2000 and 2017. A two-stage selection process was utilized to determine eligible studies. A total of 74 studies were considered for final analysis. RESULTS: Optical imaging technologies have emerged as an adjunct to white-light cystoscopy and can be classified according to their scope as macroscopic, microscopic and molecular. Macroscopic techniques including photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), narrow-band imaging (NBI) and the Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (IMAGE1 S, formerly known as SPIES) are similar to white-light cystoscopy, but are superior in the detection of bladder tumors by means of contrast enhancement. Especially the detection rate of very mute lesions in the bladder mucosa (CIS) could be significantly increased by the use of these methods. Microscopic imaging techniques like confocal laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography permit a real-time high-resolution assessment of the bladder mucosa at a cellular and sub-cellular level with spatial resolutions similar to histology, enabling the surgeon to perform an 'optical biopsy'. Molecular techniques are based on the combination of optical imaging technologies with fluorescence labeling of cancer-specific molecular agents like antibodies. This labeling is intended to favor an optical distinction between benign and malignant tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Optical improvements of the standard white-light cystoscopy have proven their benefit in the detection of BCa and have found their way into clinical practice. Especially the combination of macroscopic and microscopic techniques may improve diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless, HAL-PDD guided cystoscopy is the only approach approved for routine use in the diagnosis of BCa by most urological associations in the EU and USA to date.
BACKGROUND: For over 100 years white-light cystoscopy has remained the gold-standard technique for the detection of bladder cancer (BCa). Some limitations in the detection of flat lesions (CIS), the differentiation between inflammation and malignancy, the inaccurate determination of the tumor margin status as well as the tumor depth, have led to a variety of technological improvements. The aim of this review is to evaluate the impact of these improvements in the diagnosis of BCa and their effectiveness in clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA statement to identify studies reporting on imaging modalities in the diagnosis of NMIBC between 2000 and 2017. A two-stage selection process was utilized to determine eligible studies. A total of 74 studies were considered for final analysis. RESULTS: Optical imaging technologies have emerged as an adjunct to white-light cystoscopy and can be classified according to their scope as macroscopic, microscopic and molecular. Macroscopic techniques including photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), narrow-band imaging (NBI) and the Storz Professional Image Enhancement System (IMAGE1 S, formerly known as SPIES) are similar to white-light cystoscopy, but are superior in the detection of bladder tumors by means of contrast enhancement. Especially the detection rate of very mute lesions in the bladder mucosa (CIS) could be significantly increased by the use of these methods. Microscopic imaging techniques like confocal laser endomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography permit a real-time high-resolution assessment of the bladder mucosa at a cellular and sub-cellular level with spatial resolutions similar to histology, enabling the surgeon to perform an 'optical biopsy'. Molecular techniques are based on the combination of optical imaging technologies with fluorescence labeling of cancer-specific molecular agents like antibodies. This labeling is intended to favor an optical distinction between benign and malignant tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Optical improvements of the standard white-light cystoscopy have proven their benefit in the detection of BCa and have found their way into clinical practice. Especially the combination of macroscopic and microscopic techniques may improve diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless, HAL-PDD guided cystoscopy is the only approach approved for routine use in the diagnosis of BCa by most urological associations in the EU and USA to date.
Authors: Ashutosh K Tewari; Maria M Shevchuk; Joshua Sterling; Sonal Grover; Michael Herman; Rajiv Yadav; Kumaran Mudalair; Abhishek Srivastava; Mark A Rubin; Warren R Zipfel; Frederick R Maxfield; Chris Xu; Watt W Webb; Sushmita Mukherjee Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Arnulf Stenzl; Hannes Penkoff; Elfriede Dajc-Sommerer; Andreas Zumbraegel; Lorenz Hoeltl; Michael Scholz; Claus Riedl; Josef Bugelnig; Alfred Hobisch; Maximilian Burger; Gregor Mikuz; Uwe Pichlmeier Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael Rink; Marko Babjuk; James W F Catto; Patrice Jichlinski; Shahrokh F Shariat; Arnulf Stenzl; Herbert Stepp; Dirk Zaak; J Alfred Witjes Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Arnulf Stenzl; Maximilian Burger; Yves Fradet; Lance A Mynderse; Mark S Soloway; J Alfred Witjes; Martin Kriegmair; Alexander Karl; Yu Shen; H Barton Grossman Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Yves Fradet; H Barton Grossman; Leonard Gomella; Seth Lerner; Michael Cookson; David Albala; Michael J Droller Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: M C Kriegmair; S Hein; D S Schoeb; H Zappe; R Suárez-Ibarrola; F Waldbillig; B Gruene; P-F Pohlmann; F Praus; K Wilhelm; C Gratzke; A Miernik; C Bolenz Journal: Urologe A Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Jaena Park; Rebecca L Kamerer; Marina Marjanovic; Janet E Sorrells; Sixian You; Ronit Barkalifa; Kimberly A Selting; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2022-05-15 Impact factor: 5.942
Authors: Nicholas Lee; Ashan Canagasingham; Mohit Bajaj; Ramesh Shanmugasundaram; Anthony Hutton; Joseph Bucci; Peter Graham; James Thompson; Jie Ni Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 5.738