Literature DB >> 29662246

Why come back home? Breeding-site fidelity varies with group size and parasite load in a colonial bird.

Charles R Brown1, Erin A Roche2, Mary Bomberger Brown3.   

Abstract

Fidelity to a past breeding site is widespread among animals and may confer both costs and benefits. Colonial species occur at specific sites that can accommodate multiple breeders, and the choice of whether to return to last year's site or disperse elsewhere can affect colony site use, the colony size distribution and individual fitness. For the colonial cliff swallow, Petrochelidon pyrrhonota, which occupies colonies of widely different sizes, we used a 30-year field study in western Nebraska to investigate how the extent of infestation by ectoparasites and colony size affected breeders' colony site fidelity between years. We compared philopatry at colonies where parasitic swallow bugs, Oeciacus vicarius, had been removed by fumigation with that at nonfumigated sites exposed to natural levels of ectoparasites. About 25% of birds at nonfumigated colonies returned to their previous year's site, whereas about 69% of birds at fumigated colonies did so. Site fidelity was greatest at nonfumigated sites that changed the least in size between years. Birds were less likely to return to a nonfumigated site as the colony there became increasingly larger. Individuals philopatric to both nonfumigated and fumigated sites resided in colonies more similar in size between years than did dispersing birds. Most cliff swallows settled within 6 km of their previous year's site, indicating that many nonphilopatric birds still may have had some familiarity with the local landscape surrounding the site to which they moved. Removal of ectoparasites at a site allows large colonies to persist there perennially, probably contributing to higher philopatry because such large colonies are rare and would have been difficult to find had the residents dispersed. Cliff swallows are likely to be sensitive to both colony size and general familiarity with a given site or landscape region, and probably integrate these with other cues to select breeding colonies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Petrochelidon pyrrhonota; cliff swallow; coloniality; dispersal; ectoparasitism; group living; habitat selection; philopatry; site fidelity; social behaviour

Year:  2017        PMID: 29662246      PMCID: PMC5898452          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  23 in total

Review 1.  Advances in our understanding of mammalian sex-biased dispersal.

Authors:  L J Lawson Handley; N Perrin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Variation in age composition among colony sizes in Cliff Swallows.

Authors:  Charles R Brown; Erin A Roche; Mary Bomberger Brown
Journal:  J Field Ornithol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.554

3.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates.

Authors:  W D Koenig; D Van Vuren; P N Hooge
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives.

Authors:  E Danchin; R H Wagner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Costs of dispersal.

Authors:  Dries Bonte; Hans Van Dyck; James M Bullock; Aurélie Coulon; Maria Delgado; Melanie Gibbs; Valerie Lehouck; Erik Matthysen; Karin Mustin; Marjo Saastamoinen; Nicolas Schtickzelle; Virginie M Stevens; Sofie Vandewoestijne; Michel Baguette; Kamil Barton; Tim G Benton; Audrey Chaput-Bardy; Jean Clobert; Calvin Dytham; Thomas Hovestadt; Christoph M Meier; Steve C F Palmer; Camille Turlure; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-09-19

6.  Invasion in patchy landscapes is affected by dispersal mortality and mate-finding failure.

Authors:  Jonathan A Walter; Ariel L Firebaugh; Patrick C Tobin; Kyle J Haynes
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Heritable basis for choice of group size in a colonial bird.

Authors:  C R Brown; M B Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mesotocin and nonapeptide receptors promote estrildid flocking behavior.

Authors:  James L Goodson; Sara E Schrock; James D Klatt; David Kabelik; Marcy A Kingsbury
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Recapture heterogeneity in cliff swallows: increased exposure to mist nets leads to net avoidance.

Authors:  Erin A Roche; Charles R Brown; Mary Bomberger Brown; Kristen M Lear
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Beyond habitat requirements: individual fine-scale site fidelity in a colony of the Galapagos sea lion (Zalophus wollebaeki) creates conditions for social structuring.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Fritz Trillmich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.