Literature DB >> 29661773

Integrated Genomic and Immunophenotypic Classification of Pancreatic Cancer Reveals Three Distinct Subtypes with Prognostic/Predictive Significance.

Martin Wartenberg1, Silvia Cibin1, Inti Zlobec1, Erik Vassella1, Serenella Eppenberger-Castori2, Luigi Terracciano2, Micha David Eichmann1, Mathias Worni3, Beat Gloor3, Aurel Perren1, Eva Karamitopoulou4.   

Abstract

Purpose: Current clinical classification of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unable to predict prognosis or response to chemo- or immunotherapy and does not take into account the host reaction to PDAC cells. Our aim is to classify PDAC according to host- and tumor-related factors into clinically/biologically relevant subtypes by integrating molecular and microenvironmental findings.Experimental Design: A well-characterized PDAC cohort (n = 110) underwent next-generation sequencing with a hot spot cancer panel while next-generation tissue microarrays were immunostained for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, PD-L1, p63, hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor (RHAMM), and DNA mismatch repair proteins. Previous data on FOXP3 were integrated. Immune cell counts and protein expression were correlated with tumor-derived driver mutations, clinicopathologic features (TNM 8th edition, 2017), survival, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like tumor budding.
Results: Three PDAC subtypes were identified: the "immune escape" (54%), poor in T and B cells and enriched in FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), with high-grade budding, frequent CDKN2A, SMAD4, and PIK3CA mutations, and poor outcome; the "immune rich" (35%), rich in T and B cells and poorer in FOXP3+ Tregs, with infrequent budding, lower CDKN2A and PIK3CA mutation rate, and better outcome and a subpopulation with tertiary lymphoid tissue (TLT), mutations in DNA damage response genes (STK11 and ATM), and the best outcome; and the "immune exhausted" (11%), with immunogenic microenvironment and two subpopulations-one with PD-L1 expression and a high PIK3CA mutation rate and a microsatellite-unstable subpopulation with a high prevalence of JAK3 mutations. The combination of low budding, low stromal FOXP3 counts, presence of TLTs, and absence of CDKN2A mutations confers significant survival advantage in patients with PDAC.Conclusions: Immune host responses correlate with tumor characteristics, leading to morphologically recognizable PDAC subtypes with prognostic/predictive significance. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4444-54. ©2018 AACRSee related commentary by Khalil and O'Reilly, p. 4355. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29661773     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  61 in total

1.  Inhibition of ATM Increases Interferon Signaling and Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Michael D Green; Weiping Zou; Meredith A Morgan; Xueting Lang; Jenny Lazarus; Joshua D Parsels; Shuang Wei; Leslie A Parsels; Jiaqi Shi; Nithya Ramnath; Daniel R Wahl; Marina Pasca di Magliano; Timothy L Frankel; Ilona Kryczek; Yu L Lei; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Five gene signatures were identified in the prediction of overall survival in resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Zuowei Wu; Bole Tian
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  Tumour budding in solid cancers.

Authors:  Alessandro Lugli; Inti Zlobec; Martin D Berger; Richard Kirsch; Iris D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  A Multiscale Map of the Stem Cell State in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nikki K Lytle; L Paige Ferguson; Nirakar Rajbhandari; Kathryn Gilroy; Raymond G Fox; Anagha Deshpande; Christian M Schürch; Michael Hamilton; Neil Robertson; Wei Lin; Pawan Noel; Martin Wartenberg; Inti Zlobec; Micha Eichmann; José A Galván; Eva Karamitopoulou; Tami Gilderman; Lourdes Adriana Esparza; Yutaka Shima; Philipp Spahn; Randall French; Nathan E Lewis; Kathleen M Fisch; Roman Sasik; Sara Brin Rosenthal; Marcie Kritzik; Daniel Von Hoff; Haiyong Han; Trey Ideker; Aniruddha J Deshpande; Andrew M Lowy; Peter D Adams; Tannishtha Reya
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Transportome Malfunctions and the Hallmarks of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Qi Ling; Holger Kalthoff
Journal:  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 5.545

6.  Classification of Pancreatic Cancer: Ready for Practical Application?

Authors:  Danny N Khalil; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Evolving Treatment Paradigms for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Rami Abbassi; Roland M Schmid
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-11-07

Review 8.  New Treatment Strategies for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ritu Raj Singh; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Pancreatic Cancer Immuno-oncology in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Samarth Hegde
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-25

10.  High ARHGEF2 (GEF-H1) Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis Via Cell Cycle Regulation in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Nakao; Shigeki Nakagawa; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Naoki Umezaki; Yuya Okamoto; Yoko Ogata; Noriko Yasuda-Yoshihara; Rumi Itoyama; Toshihiko Yusa; Kohei Yamashita; Tatsunori Miyata; Hirohisa Okabe; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Katsunori Imai; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.