Literature DB >> 29661573

Outcomes following laparoscopic versus open surgery for pediatric inguinal hernia repair: Analysis using a national inpatient database in Japan.

Michimasa Fujiogi1, Nobuaki Michihata2, Hiroki Matsui3, Kiyohide Fushimi4, Hideo Yasunaga3, Jun Fujishiro5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) for pediatric inguinal hernia repair, using a national inpatient database.
METHODS: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan, we compared duration of anesthesia, postoperative complications, recurrence, and metachronous hernia (MH) between LS and OS for children undergoing inguinal hernia repair from July 2010 to March 2016. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis for postoperative complications and Cox regression analysis for recurrence.
RESULTS: For 75,486 eligible patients (LS 20,186 vs. OS 55,300), the median follow-up was 815 (381-1350) days in LS and 1106 (576-1603) days in OS. The duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in LS than in OS for unilateral surgery (80 vs. 70min, p<0.001) but shorter for bilateral surgery (86 vs. 96min, p<0.001). LS had a lower proportion of MH than OS (0.3% vs. 3.4%, p<0.001). There was no significant difference between LS and OS in complications (odds ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.22-1.38; p=0.20) or recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.79; p=0.89).
CONCLUSIONS: LS patients had lower proportions of MH than OS patients. Complications and recurrence did not differ significantly between LS and OS. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopic surgery; Metachronous hernia; Postoperative complications; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29661573     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open repair for inguinal hernia in children: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masayuki Nakashima; Kazuki Ide; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Circumcision and its alternatives in Germany: an analysis of nationwide hospital routine data.

Authors:  Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski; Jan Gödeke; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Risk factors related to perioperative systemic complications and mortality in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures-analysis of a large national inpatient database.

Authors:  Shingo Morishita; Toshitaka Yoshii; Atsushi Okawa; Hiroyuki Inose; Takashi Hirai; Masato Yuasa; Kiyohide Fushimi; Takeo Fujiwara
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  A Modified Approach for Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Inguinal Hernias in Children.

Authors:  Ali Fazeli; Heidar Ali Davari; Mehrdad Hosseinpour
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2020-10-30

5.  Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) - The Benefits of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Przemysław Karol Wolak; Agnieszka Strzelecka; Aneta Piotrowska-Gall; Piotr Przemysław Wolak; Ilona Piotrowska; Katarzyna Dąbrowska; Joanna Wróbel; Grażyna Nowak-Starz
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  The Status of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Surgery in Children: A Nationwide Assessment.

Authors:  Andrea Schmedding; Ahmad Alsweed; Oliver Muensterer; Johannes Leonhardt
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.