Stephen Flaherty1, Koenraad J Mortele2, Gary J Young3. 1. Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology-MRI, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: sflaher11@gmail.com. 2. Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, D'Amore-McKim School of Business and Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report utilization trends in diagnostic imaging among commercially insured Massachusetts residents from 2009 to 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify diagnostic imaging claims in the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database for the years 2009 to 2013. We reported utilization and spending annually by imaging modality using total claims, claims per 1,000 individuals, total expenditures, and average per claim payments. RESULTS: The number of diagnostic imaging claims per insured MA resident increased only 0.6% from 2009 to 2013, whereas nonradiology claims increased by 6% annually. Overall diagnostic imaging expenditures, adjusted for inflation, were 27% lower in 2009 than 2013, compared with an 18% increase in nonimaging expenditures. Average payments per claim were lower in 2013 than 2009 for all modalities except nuclear medicine. Imaging procedure claims per 1,000 MA residents increased from 2009 to 2013 by 13% in MRI, from 147 to 166; by 17% in ultrasound, from 453 to 530; and by 12% in radiography (x-ray), from 985 to 1,100. However, CT claims per 1,000 fell by 37%, from 341 to 213, and nuclear medicine declined 57%, from 89 claims per 1,000 to 38. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging utilization exhibited negligible growth over the study period. Diagnostic imaging expenditures declined, largely the result of falling payments per claim in most imaging modalities, in contrast with increased utilization and spending on nonimaging services. Utilization of MRI, ultrasound, and x-ray increased from 2009 to 2013, whereas CT and nuclear medicine use decreased sharply, although CT was heavily impacted by billing code changes.
PURPOSE: To report utilization trends in diagnostic imaging among commercially insured Massachusetts residents from 2009 to 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify diagnostic imaging claims in the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database for the years 2009 to 2013. We reported utilization and spending annually by imaging modality using total claims, claims per 1,000 individuals, total expenditures, and average per claim payments. RESULTS: The number of diagnostic imaging claims per insured MA resident increased only 0.6% from 2009 to 2013, whereas nonradiology claims increased by 6% annually. Overall diagnostic imaging expenditures, adjusted for inflation, were 27% lower in 2009 than 2013, compared with an 18% increase in nonimaging expenditures. Average payments per claim were lower in 2013 than 2009 for all modalities except nuclear medicine. Imaging procedure claims per 1,000 MA residents increased from 2009 to 2013 by 13% in MRI, from 147 to 166; by 17% in ultrasound, from 453 to 530; and by 12% in radiography (x-ray), from 985 to 1,100. However, CT claims per 1,000 fell by 37%, from 341 to 213, and nuclear medicine declined 57%, from 89 claims per 1,000 to 38. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic imaging utilization exhibited negligible growth over the study period. Diagnostic imaging expenditures declined, largely the result of falling payments per claim in most imaging modalities, in contrast with increased utilization and spending on nonimaging services. Utilization of MRI, ultrasound, and x-ray increased from 2009 to 2013, whereas CT and nuclear medicine use decreased sharply, although CT was heavily impacted by billing code changes.
Authors: Amanda L Blackford; Marcia Irene Canto; Alison P Klein; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Yusuf Parak; Razaan Davis; Michelle Barnard; Amanda Fernandez; Keith Cloete; Matodzi Mukosi; Richard D Pitcher Journal: SA J Radiol Date: 2022-07-22