L M Vernooij1, W A van Klei2, M Machina3, W Pasma4, W S Beattie3, L M Peelen5. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.m.vernooij@umcutrecht.nl. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Associations between intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and postoperative complications have been reported. We examined whether using different methods to model IOH affected the association with postoperative myocardial injury (POMI) and acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: This two-centre cohort study included 10 432 patients aged ≥50 yr undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Twelve different methods to statistically model IOH [representing presence, depth, duration, and area under the threshold (AUT)] were applied to examine the association with POMI and AKI using logistic regression analysis. To define IOH, eight predefined thresholds were chosen. RESULTS: The incidences of POMI and AKI were 14.9% and 14.8%, respectively. Different methods to model IOH yielded effect estimates differing in size and statistical significance. Methods with the highest odds were absolute maximum decrease in blood pressure (BP) and mean episode AUT, odds ratio (OR) 1.43 [99% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.77] and OR 1.69 (99% CI: 0.99-2.88), respectively, for the absolute mean arterial pressure 50 mm Hg threshold. After standardisation, the highest standardised ORs were obtained for depth-related methods, OR 1.12 (99% CI: 1.05-1.20) for absolute and relative maximum decrease in BP. No single method always yielded the highest effect estimate in every setting. However, methods with the highest effect estimates remained consistent across different BP types, thresholds, outcomes, and centres. CONCLUSIONS: In studies on IOH, both the threshold to define hypotension and the method chosen to model IOH affects the association of IOH with outcome. This makes different studies on IOH less comparable and hampers clinical application of reported results.
BACKGROUND: Associations between intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and postoperative complications have been reported. We examined whether using different methods to model IOH affected the association with postoperative myocardial injury (POMI) and acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: This two-centre cohort study included 10 432 patients aged ≥50 yr undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Twelve different methods to statistically model IOH [representing presence, depth, duration, and area under the threshold (AUT)] were applied to examine the association with POMI and AKI using logistic regression analysis. To define IOH, eight predefined thresholds were chosen. RESULTS: The incidences of POMI and AKI were 14.9% and 14.8%, respectively. Different methods to model IOH yielded effect estimates differing in size and statistical significance. Methods with the highest odds were absolute maximum decrease in blood pressure (BP) and mean episode AUT, odds ratio (OR) 1.43 [99% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.77] and OR 1.69 (99% CI: 0.99-2.88), respectively, for the absolute mean arterial pressure 50 mm Hg threshold. After standardisation, the highest standardised ORs were obtained for depth-related methods, OR 1.12 (99% CI: 1.05-1.20) for absolute and relative maximum decrease in BP. No single method always yielded the highest effect estimate in every setting. However, methods with the highest effect estimates remained consistent across different BP types, thresholds, outcomes, and centres. CONCLUSIONS: In studies on IOH, both the threshold to define hypotension and the method chosen to model IOH affects the association of IOH with outcome. This makes different studies on IOH less comparable and hampers clinical application of reported results.
Authors: Eric Y Chen; George Michel; Bin Zhou; Feng Dai; Shamsuddin Akhtar; Robert B Schonberger Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Gumersindo Javier Solares; Daniel Garcia; Manuel Ignacio Monge Garcia; Carlos Crespo; Jose Luis Rabago; Francisco Iglesias; Eduardo Larraz; Idoia Zubizarreta; Jose Manuel Rabanal Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Esther M Wesselink; Masieh Abawi; Nynke H M Kooistra; Teus H Kappen; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Marielle Emmelot-Vonk; Wietze Pasma; Wilton A van Klei; Romy C van Jaarsveld; Charlotte S van Dongen; Pieter A F M Doevendans; Arjen J C Slooter; Pieter R Stella Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Wietze Pasma; Linda M Peelen; Stefanie van den Broek; Stef van Buuren; Wilton A van Klei; Jurgen C de Graaff Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2019-12-22 Impact factor: 2.105