Literature DB >> 29661259

Low fertility, fecundity and numbers of mated female offspring explain the lower reproductive success of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor in African honeybees.

Beatrice T Nganso1, Ayuka T Fombong1, Abdullahi A Yusuf2, Christian W W Pirk2, Charles Stuhl3, Baldwyn Torto1.   

Abstract

Although Varroa destructor is the most serious ecto-parasite to the honeybee, Apis mellifera L., some honeybee populations such as Apis mellifera scutellata in Kenya can survive mite infestations without treatment. Previously, we reported that grooming behaviour could be a potential tolerant mechanism expressed by this honeybee subspecies towards mite infestation. However, both hygienic and grooming behaviours could not explain the lower mite-infestation levels recorded in these colonies. Here, we investigated the involvement of other potential resistant mechanisms including suppression of mite reproduction in worker brood cells of A. m. scutellata to explain the low mite numbers in their colonies. High infertility rates (26-27%) and percentages of unmated female offspring (39-58%) as well as low fecundity (1.7-2.2, average offspring produced) were identified as key parameters that seem to interact with one another during different seasons to suppress mite reproduction in A. m. scutellata colonies. We also identified offspring mortality in both sexes and absence of male offspring as key factors accounting for the low numbers of mated daughter mites produced in A. m. scutellata colonies. These results suggest that reduced mite reproductive success could explain the slow mite population growth in A. m. scutellata colonies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African honeybees; Varroa destructor; reproduction; resistance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29661259     DOI: 10.1017/S0031182018000616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitology        ISSN: 0031-1820            Impact factor:   3.234


  5 in total

1.  Factors restraining the population growth of Varroa destructor in Ethiopian honey bees (Apis mellifera simensis).

Authors:  Haftom Gebremedhn; Bezabeh Amssalu; Lina De Smet; Dirk C de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Geographical Distribution and Selection of European Honey Bees Resistant to Varroa destructor.

Authors:  Yves Le Conte; Marina D Meixner; Annely Brandt; Norman L Carreck; Cecilia Costa; Fanny Mondet; Ralph Büchler
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Larval Exposure to Parasitic Varroa destructor Mites Triggers Specific Immune Responses in Different Honey Bee Castes and Species.

Authors:  Yu Fang; Abebe Jenberie Wubie; Mao Feng; Chuan Ma; Boris Baer; Jianke Li
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 7.381

Review 4.  Natural selection, selective breeding, and the evolution of resistance of honeybees (Apis mellifera) against Varroa.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Alphen; Bart Jan Fernhout
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.836

5.  Reproductive capacity of varroa destructor in four different honey bee subspecies.

Authors:  Richard Odemer
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.219

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.