Literature DB >> 29660760

Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: National trends in utilization from 2005 to 2014.

Sherise Epstein1,2, Bao N Tran1, Justin B Cohen1, Samuel J Lin1, Dhruv Singhal1, Bernard T Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence of racial disparities in the receipt of postmastectomy breast reconstruction is well documented. The objective of this study was to describe trends in racial disparities overall and by reconstructive technique.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify women who underwent mastectomy and/or breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2014. Patient demographics were recorded, and cases were grouped by reconstructive status and technique. Trends were assessed with the Cochran-Armitage test and the index of disparity.
RESULTS: Over the study period, 92,960 postmastectomy patients were identified (77,049 white women, 10,396 black women, 4939 Asian women, and 576 Native American women), of whom 46,931 underwent reconstruction. Of these, 7692 women underwent autologous reconstructions (3913 free flaps and 3696 pedicled flaps). From 2005 to 2014, receipt of breast reconstruction by postmastectomy patients rose from 33.2% to 60.0%, receipt of autologous reconstruction by patients who underwent breast reconstruction fell from 30.4% to 15.9%, and receipt of free-flap reconstruction by patients who underwent autologous reconstruction rose from 15.0% to 70.8%. These trends were significant in all racial subgroups (P < .001), except for Native Americans (P = .269). The index of disparity decreased from 51.4% to 22.6% for overall receipt of breast reconstruction, decreased from 10.7% to 7.0% for tissue expander and implant-based reconstruction, increased from 18.0% to 27.3% for autologous reconstruction, and decreased from 66.7% to 4.3% for free-flap reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction is steadily rising in the United States. Racial disparities persist, but progress has been made. Further efforts are needed to reduce racial disparities. Cancer 2018;124:2774-2784.
© 2018 American Cancer Society. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous reconstruction; breast cancer; breast reconstruction; implant reconstruction; racial disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29660760     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  Improvement in Breast Reconstruction Disparities following Medicaid Expansion under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Kirithiga Ramalingam; Liang Ji; Saeed Pairawan; David Caba Molina; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The past, the present and the future of UK breast reconstruction-are our practices outdated in 2020?

Authors:  Primeera Wignarajah; Parto Forouhi; Charles M Malata
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

3.  Achieving consistent and equitable access to post mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Anne C O'Neill
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

4.  Impact of insurance payer and socioeconomic status on type of autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jacob Dinis; Alexandra Junn; Fouad Chouairi; Michael Mercier; Tomer Avraham; Evan Matros; Michael Alperovich
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  One Size Does Not Fit All; Patient Preference for Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shreya Raman; Lauren E Powell; Emily S Andersen; Lauren C Nigro
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-09-21

6.  Racial Disparity in Immediate Breast Reconstruction; a Gap That is not Closing.

Authors:  Mahdi Malekpour; Sean Devitt; Joseph DeSantis; Christian Kauffman
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 0.558

7.  The Impact of Race on Perioperative and Patient-Reported Outcomes following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sabine Oskar; Jonas A Nelson; Madeleine E V Hicks; Kenneth P Seier M S; Kay See Tan; Jacqueline J Chu; Scott West; Robert J Allen; Andrea V Barrio; Evan Matros; Anoushka M Afonso
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.169

8.  Impact of Physician Payments on Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claim Database Analysis.

Authors:  Hina Panchal; Meghana G Shamsunder; Avraham Sheinin; Clifford C Sheckter; Nicholas L Berlin; Jonas A Nelson; Robert Allen; David Rubin; Jeffrey H Kozlow; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.169

9.  Closing the Breast Cancer Loop: Barriers and Perceptions of Breast Reconstruction among Rural Women.

Authors:  Cody L Mullens; J Andres Hernandez; Mary Ellen Conn; Stephenie Kennedy-Rea; Cristiane M Ueno
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-20

10.  Factors Associated With State-Specific Medicaid Expansion and Receipt of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Kristine A Huynh; Mayank Jayaram; Chang Wang; Megan Lane; Lu Wang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.