Literature DB >> 29660717

Agricultural conservation practices can help mitigate the impact of climate change.

Moges B Wagena1, Zachary M Easton2.   

Abstract

Agricultural conservation practices (CPs) are commonly implemented to reduce diffuse nutrient pollution. Climate change can complicate the development, implementation, and efficiency of agricultural CPs by altering hydrology, nutrient cycling, and erosion. This research quantifies the impact of climate change on hydrology, nutrient cycling, erosion, and the effectiveness of agricultural CP in the Susquehanna River Basin in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA. We develop, calibrate, and test the Soil and Water Assessment Tool-Variable Source Area (SWAT-VSA) model and select four CPs; buffer strips, strip-cropping, no-till, and tile drainage, to test their effectiveness in reducing climate change impacts on water quality. We force the model with six downscaled global climate models (GCMs) for a historic period (1990-2014) and two future scenario periods (2041-2065 and 2075-2099) and quantify the impact of climate change on hydrology, nitrate-N (NO3-N), total N (TN), dissolved phosphorus (DP), total phosphorus (TP), and sediment export with and without CPs. We also test prioritizing CP installation on the 30% of agricultural lands that generate the most runoff (e.g., critical source areas-CSAs). Compared against the historical baseline and with no CPs, the ensemble model predictions indicate that climate change results in annual increases in flow (4.5±7.3%), surface runoff (3.5±6.1%), sediment export (28.5±18.2%) and TN export (9.5±5.1%), but decreases in NO3-N (12±12.8%), DP (14±11.5), and TP (2.5±7.4%) export. When agricultural CPs are simulated most do not appreciably change the water balance, however, tile drainage and strip-cropping decrease surface runoff, sediment export, and DP/TP, while buffer strips reduce N export. Installing CPs on CSAs results in nearly the same level of performance for most practices and most pollutants. These results suggest that climate change will influence the performance of agricultural CPs and that targeting agricultural CPs to CSAs can provide nearly the same level of water quality effects as more widespread adoption.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural conservation practices; Climate change; Critical sources areas; Nutrient cycling; SWAT-VSA

Year:  2018        PMID: 29660717     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Meeting Water Quality Goals by Spatial Targeting of Best Management Practices under Climate Change.

Authors:  Yuelu Xu; Darrell J Bosch; Moges B Wagena; Amy S Collick; Zachary M Easton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  A REVIEW OF WATER QUALITY RESPONSES TO AIR TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION CHANGES 2: NUTRIENTS, ALGAL BLOOMS, SEDIMENT, PATHOGENS.

Authors:  Rory Coffey; Michael Paul; Jen Stamp; Anna Hamilton; Thomas Johnson
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2018-12-20

3.  Quantifying effects of conservation practices on non-point source pollution in the Miyun Reservoir Watershed, China.

Authors:  Jiali Qiu; Zhenyao Shen; Lei Chen; Xiaoshu Hou
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Modeling the Effects of Future Hydroclimatic Conditions on Microbial Water Quality and Management Practices in Two Agricultural Watersheds.

Authors:  R Coffey; J Butcher; B Benham; T Johnson
Journal:  Trans ASABE       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 1.188

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.