Literature DB >> 29660369

Evaluation of an Epigenetic Assay for Predicting Repeat Prostate Biopsy Outcome in African American Men.

Robert L Waterhouse1, Leander Van Neste2, Kelvin A Moses3, Carlton Barnswell4, Jonathan L Silberstein5, Mark Jalkut6, Ronald Tutrone7, James Sylora8, Ronald Anglade9, Myron Murdock10, Zvi Shiffman11, Todd Vandenberg12, Nikhil Shah13, Michael Carter14, Manuel Krispin14, Jack Groskopf14, Wim Van Criekinge15.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an epigenetic assay performed on tissue from negative prostate biopsies in a group of African American (AA) men undergoing repeat biopsy, and to compare accuracy for predicting repeat biopsy outcome to prior studies conducted in predominantly Caucasian populations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 211 AA men from 7 urology centers across the United States; all of whom were undergoing 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided repeat biopsy within 30 months from a negative index biopsy. All biopsy cores from the negative index biopsy were profiled for the epigenetic biomarkers GSTP1, APC, and RASSF1 using ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer (MDxHealth, Irvine, CA).
RESULTS: Upon repeat biopsy, 130 of 211 subjects (62%) had no prostate cancer (PCa) detected and 81 of 211 (38%) were diagnosed with PCa. Of the subjects with PCa, 54 (67%) were diagnosed with Gleason score (GS) ≤6 PCa and 27 (33%) with GS ≥7 disease. For detection of PCa at repeat biopsy, ConfirmMDx sensitivity was 74.1% and specificity was 60.0%, equivalent to prior studies (P = .235 and .697, respectively). For detection of GS ≥7 PCa, sensitivity was 78% and specificity was 53%. The negative predictive values for detection of all PCa and GS ≥7 PCa were 78.8% and 94.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In this group of AA men, we successfully validated an epigenetic assay to assess the need for repeat biopsy. Results were consistent with previous studies from predominantly Caucasian populations. Therefore, the ConfirmMDx assay is a useful tool for risk stratification of AA men who had an initial negative biopsy.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29660369     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current status of development of methylation biomarkers for in vitro diagnostic IVD applications.

Authors:  Olga Taryma-Leśniak; Katarzyna Ewa Sokolowska; Tomasz Kazimierz Wojdacz
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 2.  DNA Methylation Cancer Biomarkers: Translation to the Clinic.

Authors:  Warwick J Locke; Dominic Guanzon; Chenkai Ma; Yi Jin Liew; Konsta R Duesing; Kim Y C Fung; Jason P Ross
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Rethinking active surveillance for prostate cancer in African American men.

Authors:  Gabriel Z Leinwand; Andrew T Gabrielson; Louis S Krane; Jonathan L Silberstein
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-09

4.  Epigenome-Wide Association Study of Prostate Cancer in African Americans Identifies DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Aggressive Disease.

Authors:  Yifan Xu; Chia-Wen Tsai; Wen-Shin Chang; Yuyan Han; Maosheng Huang; Curtis A Pettaway; Da-Tian Bau; Jian Gu
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 5.  Health inequity drives disease biology to create disparities in prostate cancer outcomes.

Authors:  William G Nelson; Otis W Brawley; William B Isaacs; Elizabeth A Platz; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Karen S Sfanos; Tamara L Lotan; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 14.808

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.