Literature DB >> 29659878

Retail stability of three beef muscles from grass-, legume-, and feedlot-finished cattle.

Jerrad F Legako1, Traci Cramer1, Krista Yardley2, Talya J Murphy2, ToniRae Gardner2, Arkopriya Chail2, Lance R Pitcher3, Jennifer W MacAdam3.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the influence of finishing diet on beef appearance and lipid oxidation of three beef muscles. A total of 18 Angus steers were selected from three diet treatments: grass-finished (USUGrass), legume-finished (USUBFT), and grain-finished (USUGrain). After processing, longissimus thoracis (LT), triceps brachii (TB), and gluteus medius (GM) steaks were evaluated over a 7-d display period. A muscle × diet interaction was observed for instrumental lightness (L*) and redness (a*) (P ≤ 0.001). Within each combination, USUGrass was considered darker with lower (P < 0.05) L* compared with USUGrain. For USUBFT, L* was similar to USUGrain for the TB and LT, while the L* of USUBFT and USUGrain GM differed (P < 0.05). In terms of redness, LT a* values were elevated (P < 0.05) in USUGrass compared with USUBFT and USUGrain. For GM steaks, a* of USUBFT and USUGrass were each greater (P < 0.05) than USUGrain. Surface a* of TB steaks were greatest (P < 0.05) for USUGrass followed by USUBFT, and with USUGrain, being lowest (P < 0.05). An overall increase in L* was observed throughout display dependent on diet (P = 0.013). During display, USUGrain steaks had the greatest (P < 0.05) L* followed by USUBFT and USUGrass. Additionally, a day × muscle interaction was observed for a* (P = 0.009). Initially, TB steaks had the greatest (P < 0.05) a* values. However, at day 3, a* values were similar (P > 0.05) among muscles. Visual color scores were in agreement with loss of redness (a*) during display, dependent on diet and muscle type (P < 0.001). Similarly, a day × diet × muscle interaction was observed for visual discoloration (P < 0.001). Day and diet interacted to influence thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (P < 0.001). Initial values did not differ (P > 0.05) between USUGrain and USUBFT; however, USUGrass had lower initial (P < 0.05) TBARS than both USUGrain and USUBFT. At days 3 and 7, TBARS were greatest (P < 0.05) in USUGrain steaks, followed by USUBFT, which was greater (P < 0.05) than USUGrass. A diet × muscle interaction was observed for 10 volatile compounds originating from lipid degradation (P ≤ 0.013). These compounds were less (P < 0.05) abundant in USUGrass compared to TB or GM of USUGrain. This study determined grass-finished beef to have a darker more red color and less lipid oxidation in multiple muscles. Possible mechanisms for this may include an increase in endogenous antioxidants in grass-finished beef.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29659878      PMCID: PMC6095342          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Characterisation of volatile compounds produced by bacteria isolated from the spoilage flora of cold-smoked salmon.

Authors:  J J Joffraud; F Leroi; C Roy; J L Berdagué
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program.

Authors:  K M Killinger; C R Calkins; W J Umberger; D M Feuz; K M Eskridge
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Influence of pasture or grain-based diets supplemented with vitamin E on antioxidant/oxidative balance of Argentine beef.

Authors:  A M Descalzo; E M Insani; A Biolatto; A M Sancho; P T García; N A Pensel; J A Josifovich
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef.

Authors:  C Wu; S K Duckett; J P S Neel; J P Fontenot; W M Clapham
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  A comparison of the aroma volatiles and fatty acid compositions of grilled beef muscle from Aberdeen Angus and Holstein-Friesian steers fed diets based on silage or concentrates.

Authors:  J S Elmore; H E Warren; D S Mottram; N D Scollan; M Enser; R I Richardson; J D Wood
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Effect of pasture vs. concentrate feeding with or without antioxidants on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and quality of Uruguayan beef.

Authors:  C E Realini; S K Duckett; G W Brito; M Dalla Rizza; D De Mattos
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Zilpaterol hydrochloride supplementation has no effect on the shelf life of ground beef.

Authors:  L D Luqué; B J Johnson; J N Martin; M F Miller; J M Hodgen; J P Hutcheson; W T Nichols; M N Streeter; D A Yates; D M Allen; J C Brooks
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Assessment of volatile compounds, neutral and polar lipid fatty acids of four beef muscles from USDA Choice and Select graded carcasses and their relationships with consumer palatability scores and intramuscular fat content.

Authors:  M R Hunt; J F Legako; T T N Dinh; A J Garmyn; T G O'Quinn; C H Corbin; R J Rathmann; J C Brooks; M F Miller
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Consumer sensory evaluation and chemical composition of beef gluteus medius and triceps brachii steaks from cattle finished on forage or concentrate diets.

Authors:  A Chail; J F Legako; L R Pitcher; R E Ward; S Martini; J W MacAdam
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Legume finishing provides beef with positive human dietary fatty acid ratios and consumer preference comparable with grain-finished beef.

Authors:  A Chail; J F Legako; L R Pitcher; T C Griggs; R E Ward; S Martini; J W MacAdam
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  3 in total

1.  Volatile flavor compounds vary by beef product type and degree of doneness.

Authors:  Kourtney Gardner; Jerrad F Legako
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Influence of beef genotypes on animal performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and sensory characteristics in grazing or feedlot-finished steers.

Authors:  Isabella C F Maciel; J P Schweihofer; J I Fenton; J Hodbod; M G S McKendree; K Cassida; J E Rowntree
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-09-21

3.  Evaluating the Shelf Life and Sensory Properties of Beef Steaks from Cattle Raised on Different Grass Feeding Systems in the Western United States.

Authors:  Toni L Duarte; Bakytzhan Bolkenov; Sarah C Klopatek; James W Oltjen; D Andy King; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Xiang Yang
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.