Mustafa A Elattar1,2, Abdullah Kaya3, Nils R Planken4, Jan Baan5, Ed T Vanbavel1, Bas A J M de Mol3,5, Henk A Marquering1,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2. Department of Informatics Science, Communication and Information Technology School, Nile University, Giza, Egypt. 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 5. Department of Heart Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement has proven its value over the last decade by its significant advancement and reduction in mortality, morbidity and admission time. However, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is associated with some on-site difficulties such as limited aortic annulus exposure. Currently, computed tomography scans are used to evaluate the anatomical relationship among the intercostal spaces, ascending aorta and aortic valve prior to surgery. We hypothesized that quantitative measurements of access distance and access angle are associated with outcome and access difficulty. METHODS: We introduce a novel minimally invasive aortic valve replacement planning prototype that allows automatic measurements of access angle, access distance and aortic annulus dimensions. The prototype visualizes these measurements on the chest cage as ISO contours. The association of these measures with outcome parameters such as extracorporeal circulation time, aortic cross-clamping time and access difficulty score was assessed. We included 14 patients who received a new valve by ministernotomy. RESULTS: The mean access angle was 40.3 ± 5.1°. It was strongly associated with aortic cross-clamping time (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.60, P = 0.02) and access difficulty score (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.57, P = 0.03). Access angles were significantly different between easy and difficult access groups (P = 0.03). There was no significant association between access distance and outcome parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Access angle is strongly associated with procedure complexity. The automated presentation of this measure suggests added value of the prototype in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement has proven its value over the last decade by its significant advancement and reduction in mortality, morbidity and admission time. However, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is associated with some on-site difficulties such as limited aortic annulus exposure. Currently, computed tomography scans are used to evaluate the anatomical relationship among the intercostal spaces, ascending aorta and aortic valve prior to surgery. We hypothesized that quantitative measurements of access distance and access angle are associated with outcome and access difficulty. METHODS: We introduce a novel minimally invasive aortic valve replacement planning prototype that allows automatic measurements of access angle, access distance and aortic annulus dimensions. The prototype visualizes these measurements on the chest cage as ISO contours. The association of these measures with outcome parameters such as extracorporeal circulation time, aortic cross-clamping time and access difficulty score was assessed. We included 14 patients who received a new valve by ministernotomy. RESULTS: The mean access angle was 40.3 ± 5.1°. It was strongly associated with aortic cross-clamping time (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.60, P = 0.02) and access difficulty score (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.57, P = 0.03). Access angles were significantly different between easy and difficult access groups (P = 0.03). There was no significant association between access distance and outcome parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Access angle is strongly associated with procedure complexity. The automated presentation of this measure suggests added value of the prototype in clinical practice.
Authors: Bruce R Boti; Vikash G Hindori; Emilio L Schade; Athina M Kougioumtzoglou; Eva C Verbeek; Annet Driessen-Waaijer; Riccardo Cocchieri; Bas A J M de Mol; Nils R Planken; Abdullah Kaya; Henk A Marquering Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 1.637