| Literature DB >> 29659606 |
Nadezhda A Wall1, C Coral Dominguez-Medina1, Sian E Faustini1, Charlotte N Cook1, Andrew McClean2, Mark D Jesky1,3, Marisol Perez-Toledo1, Matthew D Morgan1,3, Alexandra G Richter1,3, Charles J Ferro1,3, Paul Cockwell1,3, Paul A Moss1,3, Ian R Henderson1, Lorraine Harper1,3, Adam F Cunningham1.
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of infection and poorer responses to vaccination. This suggests that CKD patients have an impaired responsiveness to all antigens, even those first encountered before CKD onset. To examine this we evaluated antibody responses against two childhood vaccine antigens, tetanus (TT) and diphtheria toxoids (DT) and two common pathogens, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SEn) in two independent cohorts consisting of age-matched individuals with and without CKD. Sera were evaluated for antigen-specific IgG titres and the functionality of antibody to SEn was assessed in a serum bactericidal assay. Surprisingly, patients with CKD and control subjects had comparable levels of IgG against TT and DT, suggesting preserved humoral memory responses to antigens encountered early in life. Lipopolysaccharide-specific IgG titres and serum bactericidal activity in patients with CKD were also not inferior to controls. CMV-specific IgG titres in seropositive CKD patients were similar or even increased compared to controls. Therefore, whilst responses to new vaccines in CKD are typically lower than expected, antibody responses to antigens commonly encountered prior to CKD onset are not. The immunodeficiency of CKD is likely characterised by failure to respond to new antigenic challenges and efforts to improve patient outcomes should be focussed here.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29659606 PMCID: PMC5901993 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of demographic, clinical and laboratory data for cohort 1 patients with CKD and controls.
| Controls (n = 39) | CKD (n = 43) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 57 (15) | 63 (28) | 0.10 | |
| 22 (57) | 12 (28) | 0.01 | |
| 82 (16) | 25 (13) | <0.0001 | |
| - | 16 (37) | ||
| - | 23 (54) | ||
| 4 (9) | |||
| - | 10 (23) | ||
| - | 8 (19) | ||
| - | 5 (12) | ||
| - | 9 (21) | ||
| - | 1 (2) | ||
| - | 10 (23) | ||
| 0 | 15 (35) | <0.0001 | |
| 0.90 (2.19) | 2.10 (6.85) | <0.01 | |
| 5.6 (1.7) | 7.5 (3.1) | <0.0001 | |
| 3.3 (1.4) | 4.7 (2.0) | <0.0001 | |
| - | 1.6 (0.6) | - |
Medians and interquartile range shown unless indicated.
a2-tailed Mann-Whitney test;
b2-tailed Fisher’s exact test; significance is defined as p<0.05. eGFR–estimated glomerular filtration rate, hsCRP–highly sensitive C-reactive protein, WCC–white cell count.
Summary of demographic, clinical and laboratory data for cohort 2 patients with CKD and controls.
| Controls (n = 20) | CKD (n = 25) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72 (9) | 73 (9) | 0.46 | |
| 9 (45) | 17 (68) | 0.14 | |
| 75 (16) | 23 (13) | <0.0001 | |
| - | 7 (28) | ||
| - | 18 (72) | ||
| 0 | |||
| - | 10 (40) | ||
| - | 2 (8) | ||
| - | 0 | ||
| - | 0 | ||
| - | 0 | ||
| - | 10 (40) | ||
| 1 (5) | 18 (72) | <0.0001 | |
| 0.84 (1.11) | 5.58 (6.11) | <0.0001 | |
| 6.0 (2.7) | 7.4 (3.2) | <0.01 | |
| 3.4 (1.8) | 5.0 (3.4) | <0.001 | |
| 1.7 (0.78) | 1.3 (1.0) | 0.10 |
Medians and interquartile range shown unless indicated.
a2-tailed Mann-Whitney test;
b2-tailed Fisher’s exact test; significance is defined as p<0.05. eGFR–estimated glomerular filtration rate, hsCRP–highly sensitive C-reactive protein, WCC–white cell count.
Fig 1Anti-TT and anti-DT IgG titres in cohort 1 patients with CKD and controls.
Antigen-specific IgG titres (μg/ml) in cohort 1 CKD patients and age-matched controls (n = 43 and 39 respectively) are shown with medians and interquartile range. A–anti-TT IgG; B–anti-DT IgG. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney p values shown.
Fig 2Anti-TT and anti-DT IgG titres in cohort 2 patients with CKD and controls with known vaccination history.
Antigen-specific IgG titres (μg/ml) in cohort 2 CKD patients and age-matched controls (n = 22 and 19 respectively) are shown with medians for individuals vaccinated with TT/DT booster in preceding 10 years (blue) and those who were not (orange). The median for anti-DT IgG in controls not boosted within preceding 10 years is 0.01. A–anti-TT IgG; B–anti-DT IgG. Two-tailed Mann-Whitney p values are shown.
Fig 3CMV-specific IgG titres in seropositive patients with CKD and controls.
Serum CMV-specific IgG titres are shown only for seropositive patients with CKD and controls (ELISA titre greater than 10 arbitrary units, log10 = 1) A: cohort 1 (n = 29 patients with CKD and 22 controls). B: cohort 2 (n = 21 patients with CKD and 13 controls). Error bars represent the median and interquartile range. Mann-Whitney 2-tailed p values shown.
Fig 4Anti-LPS IgG titres in patients with CKD and controls.
Serum anti-LPS IgG titres are represented relative to internal control serum from a single young healthy donor (arbitrary units, AU). A–cohort 1, B–cohort 2. Error bars represent the median and interquartile range. Mann-Whitney 2-tailed p values shown.
Fig 5Serum-dependent killing of SEn in patients with CKD and controls.
Killing curves of SEn strain D24954 by sera from A—a sub-group of cohort 1 with highest anti-LPS IgG titres: 10 patients with CKD and 9 controls; B–all patients with CKD and controls from cohort 2 (n = 25 and 20 respectively). Negative values correspond to a reduction in SEn compared with starting concentration. Antibody-depleted young healthy control serum (used as standard) served as a negative control. Error bars represent the mean +/- standard error of the mean.