Angela Stocks1, Donna Simcoe2, Dikran Toroser3, Lisa DeTora4. 1. a Medical Writing, Larix A/S , Copenhagen , Denmark. 2. b Simcoe Consultants Inc. , San Diego , CA , USA. 3. c Global Scientific Publications, Amgen Inc. , Thousand Oaks , CA , USA. 4. d Writing Studies and Rhetoric , Hofstra University , Hempstead , NY , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide clarity on the professional medical writer as author or contributor by examining what "a substantial contribution" and "accountability" mean with respect to authorship in a biomedical publication. These terms relate to criteria 1 and 4 of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship guidelines. METHODS: We reviewed the ICMJE and Good Publication Practice authorship guidelines, which recommend that individuals not meeting all four authorship criteria should be acknowledged as contributors. We also surveyed and assessed selected journals for published guidance on authorship versus contributorship. RESULTS: We found that journals often vary in their authorship guidelines for medical writers. Notwithstanding, and to assist in determining the contribution made by the medical writer, we have expanded on current guidelines to develop recommendations for important intellectual contribution to the design of the work (developing the protocol, choosing endpoints) or the interpretation of data for the work (developing the discussion, interpreting new statistical output), which should result in inclusion of the medical writer as an author, as well as when accountability is relevant. If the medical writer does not qualify as an author, then their inclusion in the acknowledgements section is appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Authors and contributors have a responsibility to create a publication that is accurate and true to the study results, but only authors must provide a substantial contribution and are accountable for that contribution. Contributions made by authors and non-author contributors should be fully described in the publication, to enable the reader to assess credit and responsibility.
OBJECTIVE: To provide clarity on the professional medical writer as author or contributor by examining what "a substantial contribution" and "accountability" mean with respect to authorship in a biomedical publication. These terms relate to criteria 1 and 4 of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship guidelines. METHODS: We reviewed the ICMJE and Good Publication Practice authorship guidelines, which recommend that individuals not meeting all four authorship criteria should be acknowledged as contributors. We also surveyed and assessed selected journals for published guidance on authorship versus contributorship. RESULTS: We found that journals often vary in their authorship guidelines for medical writers. Notwithstanding, and to assist in determining the contribution made by the medical writer, we have expanded on current guidelines to develop recommendations for important intellectual contribution to the design of the work (developing the protocol, choosing endpoints) or the interpretation of data for the work (developing the discussion, interpreting new statistical output), which should result in inclusion of the medical writer as an author, as well as when accountability is relevant. If the medical writer does not qualify as an author, then their inclusion in the acknowledgements section is appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Authors and contributors have a responsibility to create a publication that is accurate and true to the study results, but only authors must provide a substantial contribution and are accountable for that contribution. Contributions made by authors and non-author contributors should be fully described in the publication, to enable the reader to assess credit and responsibility.
Keywords:
Authorship practices; biomedical publications; medical writers; publication ethics
Authors: Fernando Alfonso; Parounak Zelveian; Jean Jacques Monsuez; Michael Aschermann; Michael Boehm; Alfonso Buendia Hernandez; Tzung Dau Wang; Ariel Cohen; Sebija Izetbegovic; Anton Doubell; Dario Echeverri; Nuray Enç; Ignacio Ferreira-González; Anetta Undas; Ulrike Fortmüller; Plamen Gatzov; Carmen Ginghina; Lino Goncalves; Addad Faouzi; Mahmoud Hassanein; Gerd Heusch; Kurt Huber; Robert Hatala; Mario Ivanusa; Chu Pak Lau; Germanas Marinskis; Livio Dei Cas; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Kjell Nikus; Eckart Fleck; Luc Pierard; Slobodan Obradović; María Del Pilar Aguilar Passano; Yangsoo Jang; Olaf Rødevand; Mikael Sander; Evgeny Shlyakhto; Çetin Erol; Dimitris Tousoulis; Dilek Ural; Jan J Piek; Albert Varga; Andreas J Flammer; François Mach; Alban Dibra; Faiq Guliyev; Alexander Mrochek; Mamanti Rogava; Ismael Guzman Melgar; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Kanat Kabdrakhmanov; Laila Haddour; Zlatko Fras; Claes Held; Valentyn Shumakov Journal: Anatol J Cardiol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 1.596
Authors: Blair R Hesp; Katsuhisa Arai; Magdalene Y S Chu; Stefanie Chuah; Jose Miguel B Curameng; Sandeep Kamat; Zhigang Ma; Andrew Sakko; Hazel Fernandez Journal: Res Integr Peer Rev Date: 2019-10-02