| Literature DB >> 29657401 |
Mitin Chanana1, Adarsh Kumar1, Som Prakash Tyagi1, Amit Kumar Singla1, Arvind Sharma1, Uiase Bin Farooq1.
Abstract
AIM: The current study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical efficacy of end-threaded intramedullary pinning for management of various long bone fractures in canines.Entities:
Keywords: Admit pin; canine; end-threaded; fracture; intramedullary; orthopedics; pinning; positive profile
Year: 2018 PMID: 29657401 PMCID: PMC5891872 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.181-185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1End-threaded intramedullary pin.
Figure-2End-threaded intramedullary positive profile screw ended self-tapping pins of different sizes used in the study.
Figure-3Positive and negative profile pins used for standardization. (a) Negative profile: Major diameter < Pitch diameter and (b) positive profile: Major diameter > Pitch diameter.
Comparison from available intramedullary implants.
| Properties | Intramedullary implants | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Steinmann pin | Available end-threaded pin | Pin designed for study | |
| Threads | Absent | Negative profile, Fine thread | Selftapping, Positive profile, Coarse thread |
| Fitting into cancellous bone | Loosely fitted as threads are absent | Grip - better than Steinmann pin but threads were not of sufficient size to engage the cancellous bone | Grip would be better than other implants as threads are of sufficient size to engage the cancellous bone tightly |
| Pin thread junction | Absent, so no breakage of implant | Weak junction point, so pin breaks from the junction | Strong junction point, no breakage will be observed |
| Tip of pin | Trocar point | Trocar point | Screw point |
Signalment of the animals during application phase.
| Pin size (mm) | Cases | Age | Body weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5/4.0 | 1 | 1 and ½ months | 3.40 |
| 2 | 2 months | 3.70 | |
| 3 | 2 months | 3.70 | |
| 4 | 3 months | 4.70 | |
| 5 | 4 months | 4.50 | |
| 6 | 4 months | 4.30 | |
| 7 | 18 months | 11.50 | |
| 4.5/5.0 | 8 | 3 and ½ months | 8.50 |
| 9 | 4 months | 9.75 | |
| 10 | 4 months | 11.00 | |
| 11 | 6 months | 7 | |
| 12 | 6 months | 13 | |
| 13 | 6 months | 13 | |
| 14 | 9 years | 15 | |
| 4.5/6.5 | 15 | 8 months | 9.40 |
| 16 | 11 months | 21 | |
| 17 | 1 year | 21 | |
| 18 | 4 months | 7.5 | |
| 19 | 4 months | 9.80 |
Figure-4Serial radiographic observations in Group-II (positive profile pin) in two of the patients presented with a complete mid-diaphyseal simple spiral fracture of the right femur and closed complete comminuted distal diaphyseal fracture of left femur, respectively. Case-I: (a) pre-operative, (b) immediate post-operative, (c) 21 days post-operative, and (d) post pin removal. Case-II: (a) pre-operative, (b) post-operative, (c) 21 days post-operative, and (d) post pin removal.