Literature DB >> 29657117

Evidence that Magnetic Navigation and Geomagnetic Imprinting Shape Spatial Genetic Variation in Sea Turtles.

J Roger Brothers1, Kenneth J Lohmann2.   

Abstract

The canonical drivers of population genetic structure, or spatial genetic variation, are isolation by distance and isolation by environment. Isolation by distance predicts that neighboring populations will be genetically similar and geographically distant populations will be genetically distinct [1]. Numerous examples also exist of isolation by environment, a phenomenon in which populations that inhabit similar environments (e.g., same elevation, temperature, or vegetation) are genetically similar even if they are distant, whereas populations that inhabit different environments are genetically distinct even when geographically close [2-4]. These dual models provide a widely accepted conceptual framework for understanding population structure [5-8]. Here, we present evidence for an additional, novel process that we call isolation by navigation, in which the navigational mechanism used by a long-distance migrant influences population structure independently of isolation by either distance or environment. Specifically, we investigated the population structure of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) [9], which return to nest on their natal beaches by seeking out unique magnetic signatures along the coast-a behavior known as geomagnetic imprinting [10-12]. Results reveal that spatial variation in Earth's magnetic field strongly predicts genetic differentiation between nesting beaches, even when environmental similarities and geographic proximity are taken into account. The findings provide genetic corroboration of geomagnetic imprinting [10, 13]. Moreover, they provide strong evidence that geomagnetic imprinting and magnetic navigation help shape the population structure of sea turtles and perhaps numerous other long-distance migrants that return to their natal areas to reproduce [13-17].
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  geomagnetic imprinting; magnetic navigation; natal homing; sea turtles

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29657117     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  6 in total

1.  Magnetosensation.

Authors:  Nathan F Putman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  The amphibian magnetic sense(s).

Authors:  John B Phillips; Francisco J Diego-Rasilla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 2.389

3.  Behavioral evidence for geomagnetic imprinting and transgenerational inheritance in fruit flies.

Authors:  In-Taek Oh; Hye-Jin Kwon; Soo-Chan Kim; Hyung-Jun Kim; Kenneth J Lohmann; Kwon-Seok Chae
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How might magnetic secular variation impact avian philopatry?

Authors:  Joe Wynn; Oliver Padget; Joe Morford; Paris Jaggers; Katrina Davies; Emma Borsier; Tim Guilford
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Magnetic maps in animal navigation.

Authors:  Kenneth J Lohmann; Kayla M Goforth; Alayna G Mackiewicz; Dana S Lim; Catherine M F Lohmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Fusion of wildlife tracking and satellite geomagnetic data for the study of animal migration.

Authors:  Fernando Benitez-Paez; Vanessa da Silva Brum-Bastos; Ciarán D Beggan; Jed A Long; Urška Demšar
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.