Literature DB >> 29656504

Efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D vs insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes after 52 weeks: Results of the INSTRIDE 1 phase III study.

Thomas C Blevins1, Abhijit Barve2, Bin Sun2, Michael Ankersen2.   

Abstract

AIM: To test the safety and efficacy of MYL-1501D, a proposed insulin glargine biosimilar, in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
METHODS: The safety and efficacy of MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine were evaluated in INSTRIDE 1, a 52-week, open-label, randomized, phase III study in patients with T1DM. The primary objective was to determine whether once-daily MYL-1501D was non-inferior to once-daily insulin glargine when administered in combination with mealtime insulin lispro based on change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints were changes in fasting plasma glucose, insulin dose, self-monitored blood glucose and immunogenicity from baseline, and occurrences of hypoglycaemic, nocturnal hypoglycaemic and adverse events up to week 52.
RESULTS: Overall, 558 patients were randomized 1:1 to MYL-1501D or reference insulin glargine in combination with thrice-daily mealtime insulin lispro for 52 weeks. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was 0.14% (standard error [SE] 0.054; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.033, 0.244) for MYL-1501D and 0.11% (SE 0.054; 95% CI 0.007, 0.220) for reference insulin glargine. MYL-1501D had a safety profile similar to that of reference insulin glargine and was well tolerated in patients with T1DM up to week 52.
CONCLUSIONS: The upper 95% CI limit for mean change in HbA1c at week 24 indicated that MYL-1501D was non-inferior to reference insulin glargine. There were no clinically meaningful differences between groups in incidence of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, local or systemic reactions, safety or immunogenicity.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosimilar; efficacy; insulin glargine; safety; type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29656504     DOI: 10.1111/dom.13322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab        ISSN: 1462-8902            Impact factor:   6.577


  6 in total

Review 1.  Update on Biosimilar Insulins: A US Perspective.

Authors:  Rong M Zhang; Ritika Puri; Janet B McGill
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.744

2.  Efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D versus insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Results of the INSTRIDE 3 phase 3 switch study.

Authors:  Thomas C Blevins; Abhijit Barve; Yaron Raiter; Patrick Aubonnet; Sandeep Athalye; Bin Sun; Rafael Muniz
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.577

3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of proposed biosimilar MYL-1501D with US and European insulin glargine formulations in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Charles Donnelly; Abhijit Barve; Patrick Aubonnet
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.577

4.  Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jou Yang; Ta-Wei Wu; Chao-Hsiun Tang; Tzu-Rong Peng
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.763

Review 5.  MYL1501D Insulin Glargine: A Review in Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.807

6.  Similar immunogenicity profiles between the proposed biosimilar MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with diabetes mellitus: the phase 3 INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 studies.

Authors:  Bin Sun; Nilanjan Sengupta; Anita Rao; Charles Donnelly; Vinit Waichale; Arnab Sinha Roy; Shilpa Ramaswamy; Divya Pathak; Ronald R Bowsher; Yaron Raiter; Patrick Aubonnet; Abhijit Barve
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.763

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.