Literature DB >> 29656352

EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: 10-Year Experience of 99 Cases at a Single Center.

Yoshihide Kanno1, Shinsuke Koshita2, Takahisa Ogawa2, Kaori Masu2, Hiroaki Kusunose2, Toshitaka Sakai2, Toji Murabayashi2, Sho Hasegawa2, Fumisato Kozakai2, Keisuke Yonamine2, Yujiro Kawakami2, Yuki Fujii2, Jun Horaguchi2,3, Yutaka Noda2, Kei Ito2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failed at a high-volume center.
METHODS: All 99 EUS-BD cases of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction at Sendai City Medical Center between February 2007 and September 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. ERCP is strictly prioritized over EUS-BD during the study period, and EUS-BD was performed in cases wherein ERCP was impossible or ineffective. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and time to recurrence of biliary obstruction were evaluated.
RESULTS: EUS-BD was technically successful in 98% of the patients (97/99). The clinical success rate was 93% (90/97). Adverse events that were definitely related to the procedure were observed in ten patients (10%; peritonitis in six, acute cholecystitis in four). Of six patients with bile peritonitis, four suffered from mild localized peritonitis that improved with conservative treatment, whereas two developed pan-peritonitis that improved with additional intervention. Other three patients with a poor performance status succumbed shortly after the successful EUS-BD, with a possible association between the procedure and death. In the 68 patients with a bilioenteric stent, the median time to recurrence of biliary obstruction was 339 days (95% confidence interval (CI), 14-664 days) during the mean follow-up period of 136 ± 173 days.
CONCLUSION: EUS-BD was found to be feasible. However, there were a few patients with an unfavorable course after successful EUS-BD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse event; Choledochoduodenostomy; Endosonography; Hepaticogastrostomy; Indication

Year:  2019        PMID: 29656352     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-018-0096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  3 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction with surgically altered anatomy: a multicenter prospective registration study.

Authors:  Kosuke Minaga; Mamoru Takenaka; Takeshi Ogura; Takashi Tamura; Taira Kuroda; Toyoma Kaku; Yoshito Uenoyama; Chishio Noguchi; Hidefumi Nishikiori; Hajime Imai; Ryota Sagami; Nao Fujimori; Kazuhide Higuchi; Masatoshi Kudo; Yasutaka Chiba; Masayuki Kitano
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Choledochoduodenostomy Versus Hepaticogastrostomy in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kejie Mao; Binbin Hu; Feng Sun; Kaiming Wan
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 3.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy: Technical Review and Tips to Prevent Adverse Events.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogura; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.