Literature DB >> 29656132

Acquiring basic and advanced laparoscopic skills in novices using two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and ultra-high definition (4K) vision systems: A randomized control study.

M Abdelrahman1, A Belramman2, R Salem3, B Patel4.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the performance of novices in laparoscopic peg transfer and intra-corporeal suturing tasks in two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and ultra-high definition (4K) vision systems.
METHODS: Twenty-four novices were randomly assigned to 2D, 3D and 4K groups, eight in each group. All participants performed the two tasks on a box trainer until reaching proficiency. Their performance was assessed based on completion time, number of errors and number of repetitions using the validated FLS proficiency criteria.
RESULTS: Eight candidates in each group completed the training curriculum. The mean performance time (in minutes) for the 2D group was 558.3, which was more than that of the 3D and 4K groups of 316.7 and 310.4 min respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean number of repetitions was lower for the 3D and 4K groups versus the 2D group: 125.9 and 127.4 respectively versus 152.1 (P < 0.0001). The mean number of errors was lower for the 4K group versus the 3D and 2D groups: 1.2 versus 26.1 and 50.2 respectively (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The 4K vision system improved accuracy in acquiring laparoscopic skills for novices in complex tasks, which was shown in significant reduction in number of errors compared to the 3D and the 2D vision systems. The 3D and the 4K vision systems significantly improved speed and accuracy when compared to the 2D vision system based on shorter performance time, fewer errors and lesser number of repetitions.
Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgery; Three-dimensional (3D); Two-dimensional (2D); Ultra-high definition (4K); Vision systems

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29656132     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  11 in total

1.  4 K laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for ultralow rectal cancer.

Authors:  X J Zhang; P F Ma; S Li; J L Zhang; Y Z Zhao
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  So Hyun Kang; Yongjoon Won; Kanghaeng Lee; Sang Il Youn; Sa-Hong Min; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.

Authors:  Graziano Ceccarelli; Gianluca Costa; Valentina Ferraro; Michele De Rosa; Fabio Rondelli; Walter Bugiantella
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison between the 4K ultra-high definition (UHD) and high definition (HD) endoscopic systems for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Jong-Hyuk Ahn; Jae Hwan Kim; Jin Wook Yi; Min Hee Hur
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

5.  Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems using a pelvitrainer model: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tibor A Zwimpfer; Claudine Wismer; Bernhard Fellmann-Fischer; James Geiger; Andreas Schötzau; Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-26

6.  Gender benefit in laparoscopic surgical performance using a 3D-display system: data from a randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Jana Busshoff; Rabi R Datta; Thomas Bruns; Robert Kleinert; Bernd Morgenstern; David Pfister; Costanza Chiapponi; Hans F Fuchs; Michael Thomas; Caroline Gietzelt; Andrea Hedergott; Desdemona Möller; Martin Hellmich; Christiane J Bruns; Dirk L Stippel; Roger Wahba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Radical Colectomy for T4b Colon Cancer at a University Hospital in Vietnam.

Authors:  Thinh H Nguyen; Hung X Tran; Truc T Thai; Duc M La; Huy D Tran; Kien T Le; Vinh T N Pham; An N T Le; Bac H Nguyen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  4K versus 3D total laparoscopic hysterectomy by resident in training: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  S Restaino; V Vargiu; A Rosati; M Bruno; G Dinoi; E Cola; R Moroni; G Scambia; F Fanfani
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-09

9.  Application of multidirectional stitching technology in a laparoscopic suturing instructional program: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Qiong Chen; Jia-Ning Hu; Qi Shen; Lu Xia; Lin-Zhi Yan; Yi Wang; Xiu-Jie Zhu; Wen-Ju Li; Yue Hu; Qiong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  4K ultra HD technology reduces operative time and intraoperative blood loss in colorectal laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Giulio M Mari; Jacopo Crippa; Pietro Achilli; Angelo Miranda; Letizia Santurro; Valentina Riggio; Martino Gerosa; Pietro Ascheri; Giuseppe Cordaro; Andrea T M Costanzi; Dario Maggioni
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.