Literature DB >> 29655649

Clinical Outcomes of the Modified Broström Technique in the Management of Chronic Ankle Instability After Early, Intermediate, and Delayed Presentation.

Sami Hassan1, Daniel Thurston2, Tanvir Sian3, Rohi Shah3, Abdul Aziz3, Paresh Kothari4.   

Abstract

The modified Broström technique (MBT) is considered the reference standard for surgical management of ankle instability, with good short-term outcomes. However, limited evidence is available regarding outcomes for delayed presentations of instability. We report our outcomes for patients who underwent ligament repair using the MBT, from a single-surgeon retrospective study of consecutive patients. The minimum postoperative follow-up period was 6 months during a 5-year study period. The patients were retrospectively divided into 3 groups according to the delay in presentation: group 1, 6 months to 2 years; group 2, 2 to 4 years; and group 3, >4 years. We collected data on patient demographics, injury pattern, and intraoperative surgeon findings. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale (AHS) was used to evaluate patient outcomes and satisfaction with surgery. Twenty-six patients were treated with MBT. The mean follow-up period was 36.9 (range 6-42) months. Twenty-five (96.2%) patients had unilateral injuries, and 1 (3.85%) had bilateral repairs. Of the 26 patients, 21 (80.8%) completed the AOFAS-AHS, with a mean score of 87.4 (range 12 to 100). The mean interval from injury to surgery was 47.9 months. The results were excellent in 15 (71.4%), good in 3 (14.3%), fair in 1 (4.8%), and poor in 2 (9.5%) using the AOFAS-AHS. We found no significant difference in the overall AOFAS-AHS score or postoperative satisfaction among the groups (p > .05). All patients had a stable ankle joint at their final follow-up visit. In conclusion, patients with persistent or chronic ankle instability have good clinical outcomes and satisfaction after the MBT, irrespective of the time from injury to presentation.
Copyright © 2017 The American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AOFAS score; ankle; anterior talofibular ligament; fibula; surgical repair; talus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29655649     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation modalities for the anatomical repair of chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Christophe Meyer; Jon Karlsson; Romain Seil; Caroline Mouton; Eric Hamrin Senorski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [A comparative study of all-arthroscopic technique and modified open Broström technique in repair of anterior talofibular ligament with anchors].

Authors:  Gang Yi; Shijie Fu; Jing Yang; Guoyou Wang; Yang Liu; Xiaoguang Guo; Jie Shi; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-15

3.  Comparison of Arthroscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgical Repair of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament: A Retrospective Study of 80 Patients from a Single Center.

Authors:  Bo-Yuan Su; Shu-Yun Yi; Ting Peng; Gang Yi; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-02-15

4.  Preoperative Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Can Indicate the Outcomes in Repair of I-III Degree Injury of Lateral Ankle Ligament.

Authors:  Chengjie Yuan; Zhifeng Wang; Genrui Zhu; Chen Wang; Xin Ma; Xu Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Impact of Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability with Lateral Collateral Ligament Injuries on Biochemical Alterations in the Cartilage of the Subtalar and Midtarsal Joints Based on MRI T2 Mapping.

Authors:  Hongyue Tao; Yiwen Hu; Rong Lu; Yuyang Zhang; Yuxue Xie; Tianwu Chen; Shuang Chen
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.