Literature DB >> 29655202

Development of a body condition score for the mountain chicken frog (Leptodactylus fallax).

Stephanie Jayson1,2, Luke Harding3, Christopher J Michaels1, Benjamin Tapley1, Joanna Hedley2, Matthias Goetz4, Alberto Barbon4, Gerardo Garcia5, Javier Lopez5, Edmund Flach1.   

Abstract

The Critically Endangered mountain chicken frog (Leptodactylus fallax) has undergone drastic population decline due to habitat loss, hunting, invasive species, and chytridiomycosis. In response, several partner institutions initiated a conservation breeding program. It is important to maintain the captive population in good health. Therefore the program partners have recommended establishment of protocols for health examination of the species, including body condition assessment. Visual body condition scoring is a useful means to assess body condition in zoo animals for which regular bodyweight measurements are impractical or associated with capture-related stress. In this study, the authors developed a visual body condition score for the mountain chicken frog based on an ordinal categorical scale from 1 to 5 (1 = lowest body condition, 5 = highest body condition) using anatomical features that vary with total body energy reserves. Veterinary staff, animal managers, keepers, researchers, and students subsequently used the body condition score to assign scores to 98 mountain chicken frogs (41 male, 57 female) aged between 8 months and 12 years housed in five zoos in the UK and Jersey between February and March 2016. Body condition scores showed moderate (rho = 0.54; males) to strong (rho = 0.6; females) correlation with the scaled mass index, an objective measure of total energy reserves. The majority of pairwise comparisons between scores showed slight to substantial intra-observer agreement (93.8%) and slight to almost perfect inter-observer agreement (97.2%). Cases of poor agreement were likely due to limited observer experience working with the species.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amphibian; conservation; health assessment; zoo

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29655202     DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoo Biol        ISSN: 0733-3188            Impact factor:   1.421


  1 in total

1.  Current Feeding Practice of Xenopus laevis in a Laboratory Setting.

Authors:  Linda F Böswald; Dana Matzek; Bastian Popper
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.