Literature DB >> 29655043

Patterns of neural response in face regions are predicted by low-level image properties.

Katja Weibert1, Tessa R Flack1, Andrew W Young1, Timothy J Andrews2.   

Abstract

Models of face processing suggest that the neural response in different face regions is selective for higher-level attributes of the face, such as identity and expression. However, it remains unclear to what extent the response in these regions can also be explained by more basic organizing principles. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging multivariate pattern analysis (fMRI-MVPA) to ask whether spatial patterns of response in the core face regions (occipital face area - OFA, fusiform face area - FFA, superior temporal sulcus - STS) can be predicted across different participants by lower level properties of the stimulus. First, we compared the neural response to face identity and viewpoint, by showing images of different identities from different viewpoints. The patterns of neural response in the core face regions were predicted by the viewpoint, but not the identity of the face. Next, we compared the neural response to viewpoint and expression, by showing images with different expressions from different viewpoints. Again, viewpoint, but not expression, predicted patterns of response in face regions. Finally, we show that the effect of viewpoint in both experiments could be explained by changes in low-level image properties. Our results suggest that a key determinant of the neural representation in these core face regions involves lower-level image properties rather than an explicit representation of higher-level attributes in the face. The advantage of a relatively image-based representation is that it can be used flexibly in the perception of faces.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face; Identity; MVPA; Viewpoint; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29655043     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

1.  FFA and OFA Encode Distinct Types of Face Identity Information.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Katherine Storrs; Adrian Lloyd Williams; Carolyn McGettigan; Lúcia Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A data-driven approach to stimulus selection reveals an image-based representation of objects in high-level visual areas.

Authors:  David D Coggan; Afrodite Giannakopoulou; Sanah Ali; Burcu Goz; David M Watson; Tom Hartley; Daniel H Baker; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Tessa R Flack; Richard J Harris; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The bottom-up and top-down processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Xiaoxu Fan; Fan Wang; Hanyu Shao; Peng Zhang; Sheng He
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The representation of shape and texture in category-selective regions of ventral-temporal cortex.

Authors:  David D Coggan; David M Watson; Ao Wang; Robert Brownbridge; Christopher Ellis; Kathryn Jones; Charlotte Kilroy; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.698

6.  Dual-Task Interference on Early and Late Stages of Facial Emotion Detection Is Revealed by Human Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Amélie Roberge; Justin Duncan; Daniel Fiset; Benoit Brisson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.