Literature DB >> 29655011

Endocrine outcomes of endoscopic versus transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas: A system review and meta-analysis.

Nidan Qiao1.   

Abstract

It is unclear whether the endoscopic technique has any advantages over transcranial approach in the aspect of endocrine outcomes in patients with craniopharyngiomas, thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed to identify relevant studies. Pituitary, hypothalamus functions and recurrence were used as outcome measures. A total of 39 cohort studies involving 3079 adult patients were included in the comparison. Among these studies, 752 patients across 17 studies underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal resection, and 2327 patients across 23 studies underwent transcranial resection. More patients in the endoscopic group (75.7%) had visual symptoms and endocrine symptoms (60.2%) than did patients in the transcranial group (67.0%, p = 0.038 and 42.0%, p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in hypopituitarism and pan-hypopituitarism after surgery between the two groups: 72.2% and 43.7% of the patients in endoscopic group compared to 80.7% and 48.3% in the transcranial group (p = 0.140 and p = 0.713). We observed same proportions of transient and permanent diabetes insipidus in both groups. Similar recurrence was observed in both groups (p = 0.131). Pooled analysis showed that neither weight gain (p = 0.406) nor memory impairment (p = 0.995) differed between the two groups. Meta-regression analysis revealed that gross total resection contributed to the heterogeneity of recurrence proportion (p < 0.001). We observed similar proportions of endocrine outcomes and recurrence in both endoscopic and transcranial groups. More recurrences were observed in studies with lower proportions of gross total resection.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gross total resection; Hypopituitarism; Recurrence; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29655011     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Outcomes following Primary and Repeat Resection of Craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  Alexander A Aabedi; Jacob S Young; Ryan R L Phelps; Ethan A Winkler; Michael W McDermott; Philip V Theodosopoulos
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-09-10

2.  Clinical Features of Craniopharyngioma With Tumoral Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Yusi Chen; Feng Hu; Junwen Wang; Kuan Huang; Weihua Liu; Yutang Tan; Kai Zhao; Qungen Xiao; Ting Lei; Kai Shu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-14

3.  Craniopharyngioma resection and aneurysm clipping performed simultaneously by pure endoscopic endonasal approach: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Mingchao Zhang; Jian Wen Liao; Jingyang Chi; Huan Yu; Jianmin Kang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.111

4.  The safety and efficacy of endoscopic endonasal approach in the treatment of recurrent craniopharyngioma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pengtao Li; Aximujiang Axier; Shaoshan Li; Kai Zhou; Jingwei Yun; Huayi Wang; Tingrong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.