Yeşim Aksoy Derya1, Sermin Timur Taşhan2, Mesude Duman3, Yeter Durgun Ozan4. 1. Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey. Electronic address: yesim.aksoy@inonu.edu.tr. 2. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey. Electronic address: sermin.timur@inonu.edu.tr. 3. Department of Nursing, School of Health Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey. Electronic address: mesudeduman@hotmail.com. 4. Department of Nursing, School of Health Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to create a Turkish version of the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised 2 (PRAQR2), which was revised for application to multiparous and primiparous pregnancy, and to explore its psychometric characteristics in multiparous and primiparous pregnancy. DESIGN: This study was methodologically designed to assess the reliability and validity of the PRAQ-R2. SETTING: The study was carried out in the obstetrics clinic of a training and research hospital in Malatya. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 616 healthy pregnant women (399 multiparous and 217 primiparous) constituted the sample of the study. METHODS: The cultural adaptation process of the questionnaire was conducted in three phases: language validity, content validity, and pilot application. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to test the construct validity of the questionnaire. The reliability of the PRAQ-R2 was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient, item-total correlation, test-retest analysis, and parallel forms reliability. FINDINGS: The EFA revealed that the PRAQ-R2 consists of 10 items for the multiparous group and 11 for the primiparous group after adding the item ``I am anxious about the delivery because I have never experienced one before.'' The CFA for both groups supported the three-factor questionnaire yielded by the EFA. Good fit index values were obtained in both groups. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 for the multiparous group and 0.87 to 0.94 for the primiparous group for the complete PRAQ-R2 and each of its subdimensions. In addition, the item-total correlation, test-retest analysis, and parallel forms reliability of the questionnaire were highly correlated. CONCLUSION: The PRAQ-R2 is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to evaluate the level of anxiety in Turkish pregnant women irrespective of parity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of the PRAQ-R2 in prenatal healthcare services will contribute to the early diagnosis, treatment, and management of pregnancy-related anxiety.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to create a Turkish version of the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised 2 (PRAQR2), which was revised for application to multiparous and primiparous pregnancy, and to explore its psychometric characteristics in multiparous and primiparous pregnancy. DESIGN: This study was methodologically designed to assess the reliability and validity of the PRAQ-R2. SETTING: The study was carried out in the obstetrics clinic of a training and research hospital in Malatya. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 616 healthy pregnant women (399 multiparous and 217 primiparous) constituted the sample of the study. METHODS: The cultural adaptation process of the questionnaire was conducted in three phases: language validity, content validity, and pilot application. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to test the construct validity of the questionnaire. The reliability of the PRAQ-R2 was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient, item-total correlation, test-retest analysis, and parallel forms reliability. FINDINGS: The EFA revealed that the PRAQ-R2 consists of 10 items for the multiparous group and 11 for the primiparous group after adding the item ``I am anxious about the delivery because I have never experienced one before.'' The CFA for both groups supported the three-factor questionnaire yielded by the EFA. Good fit index values were obtained in both groups. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 for the multiparous group and 0.87 to 0.94 for the primiparous group for the complete PRAQ-R2 and each of its subdimensions. In addition, the item-total correlation, test-retest analysis, and parallel forms reliability of the questionnaire were highly correlated. CONCLUSION: The PRAQ-R2 is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to evaluate the level of anxiety in Turkish pregnant women irrespective of parity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of the PRAQ-R2 in prenatal healthcare services will contribute to the early diagnosis, treatment, and management of pregnancy-related anxiety.