Literature DB >> 29654878

Inter-subject phase synchronization for exploratory analysis of task-fMRI.

Taylor Bolt1, Jason S Nomi2, Shruti G Vij2, Catie Chang3, Lucina Q Uddin4.   

Abstract

Analysis of task-based fMRI data is conventionally carried out using a hypothesis-driven approach, where blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) time courses are correlated with a hypothesized temporal structure. In some experimental designs, this temporal structure can be difficult to define. In other cases, experimenters may wish to take a more exploratory, data-driven approach to detecting task-driven BOLD activity. In this study, we demonstrate the efficiency and power of an inter-subject synchronization approach for exploratory analysis of task-based fMRI data. Combining the tools of instantaneous phase synchronization and independent component analysis, we characterize whole-brain task-driven responses in terms of group-wise similarity in temporal signal dynamics of brain networks. We applied this framework to fMRI data collected during performance of a simple motor task and a social cognitive task. Analyses using an inter-subject phase synchronization approach revealed a large number of brain networks that dynamically synchronized to various features of the task, often not predicted by the hypothesized temporal structure of the task. We suggest that this methodological framework, along with readily available tools in the fMRI community, provides a powerful exploratory, data-driven approach for analysis of task-driven BOLD activity.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain synchronization; Exploratory fMRI; General linear model; Instantaneous phase analysis; Inter-subject correlation; Task fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29654878     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bring the Noise: Reconceptualizing Spontaneous Neural Activity.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The situation or the person? Individual and task-evoked differences in BOLD activity.

Authors:  Taylor Bolt; Jason S Nomi; Sierra A Bainter; Michael W Cole; Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Inter-subject phase synchronization differentiates neural networks underlying physical pain empathy.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Taylor Bolt; Jason S Nomi; Jialin Li; Xiaoxiao Zheng; Meina Fu; Keith M Kendrick; Benjamin Becker; Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Naturalistic Stimuli in Affective Neuroimaging: A Review.

Authors:  Heini Saarimäki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.