Sakshi Sharma1, Mark Oremus2. 1. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. 2. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada. Electronic address: moremus@uwaterloo.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) on health literacy and cancer screening and to investigate factors that may influence overall quality. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We reviewed SRs published between 2009 and 2017. We calculated indices to represent the included SRs' adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). To assess possible determinants of SRs' quality, we regressed the index scores on year and region of publication, journal impact factor, authors' reported use of PRISMA, and presence of funding statements. RESULTS: We included 19 SRs, and median index scores were 0.86 for PRISMA (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.11; range = 0.32-1.00) and 0.67 for AMSTAR (IQR = 0.30; range = 0.22-1.00). Methodological and reporting problems pertained to protocol registration or publication, number of raters used, gray literature searches, excluded article lists, and unintegrated discussions of risk of bias and efficacy. Only journal impact factor was statistically significantly associated (positively) with PRISMA and AMSTAR index scores. CONCLUSION: The quality of SRs on health literacy and cancer screening was generally good. Systematic reviewers should register or publish their protocols, include PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists when submitting SRs to journals, and self-evaluate their SRs before submission.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) on health literacy and cancer screening and to investigate factors that may influence overall quality. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We reviewed SRs published between 2009 and 2017. We calculated indices to represent the included SRs' adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). To assess possible determinants of SRs' quality, we regressed the index scores on year and region of publication, journal impact factor, authors' reported use of PRISMA, and presence of funding statements. RESULTS: We included 19 SRs, and median index scores were 0.86 for PRISMA (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.11; range = 0.32-1.00) and 0.67 for AMSTAR (IQR = 0.30; range = 0.22-1.00). Methodological and reporting problems pertained to protocol registration or publication, number of raters used, gray literature searches, excluded article lists, and unintegrated discussions of risk of bias and efficacy. Only journal impact factor was statistically significantly associated (positively) with PRISMA and AMSTAR index scores. CONCLUSION: The quality of SRs on health literacy and cancer screening was generally good. Systematic reviewers should register or publish their protocols, include PRISMA and AMSTAR checklists when submitting SRs to journals, and self-evaluate their SRs before submission.
Authors: Hoang Thi Nam Giang; Ali Mahmoud Ahmed; Reem Yousry Fala; Mohamed Magdy Khattab; Mona Hassan Ahmed Othman; Sara Attia Mahmoud Abdelrahman; Le Phuong Thao; Ahmed Elsaid Abd Elsamie Gabl; Samar Ahmed Elrashedy; Peter N Lee; Kenji Hirayama; Hosni Salem; Nguyen Tien Huy Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Margarita Echeverri; David Anderson; Jacqueline M Haas; Marc E Johnson; Friar Sergio A Serrano; Anna María Nápoles Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dawid Pieper; Irma Hellbrecht; Linlu Zhao; Clemens Baur; Georgia Pick; Sarah Schneider; Thomas Harder; Kelsey Young; Andrea C Tricco; Ella Westhaver; Matthew Tunis Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2022-08-22