Literature DB >> 29654535

Detecting Protein-Glycolipid Interactions Using CaR-ESI-MS and Model Membranes: Comparison of Pre-loaded and Passively Loaded Picodiscs.

Jun Li1, Ling Han1, Jianing Li1, Elena N Kitova1, Zi Jian Xiong2, Gilbert G Privé2,3, John S Klassen4.   

Abstract

Catch-and-release electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (CaR-ESI-MS), implemented using model membranes (MMs), is a promising approach for the discovery of glycolipid ligands of glycan-binding proteins (GBPs). Picodiscs (PDs), which are lipid-transporting complexes composed of the human sphingolipid activator protein saposin A and phospholipids, have proven to be useful MMs for such studies. The present work compares the use of conventional (pre-loaded) PDs with passively loaded PDs (PLPDs) for CaR-ESI-MS screening of glycolipids against cholera toxin B subunit homopentamer (CTB5). The pre-loaded PDs were prepared from a mixture of purified glycolipid and phospholipid or a mixture of lipids extracted from tissue, while the PLPDs were prepared by incubating PDs containing only phospholipid with glycolipid-containing lipid mixtures in aqueous solution. Time-dependent changes in the composition of the PLPDs produced by incubation with glycomicelles of the ganglioside GM1 were monitored using collision-induced dissociation of the gaseous PD ions and from the extent of ganglioside binding to CTB5 measured by ESI-MS. GM1 incorporation into PDs was evident within a few hours of incubation. At incubation times ≥ 10 days, GM1 binding to CTB5 was indistinguishable from that observed with pre-loaded PDs produced directly from GM1 at the same concentration. Comparison of ganglioside binding to CTB5 measured for pre-loaded PDs and PLPDs prepared from glycolipids extracted from pig and mouse brain revealed that the PLPDs allow for the detection of a greater number of ganglioside ligands. Together, the results of this study suggest PLPDs may have advantages over conventionally prepared PDs for screening glycolipids against GBPs using CaR-ESI-MS. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catch-and-release electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; Glycan-binding protein; Glycolipid; Model membranes; Nanodiscs; Picodiscs; Screening

Year:  2018        PMID: 29654535     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-018-1936-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  31 in total

1.  Nanodiscs for immobilization of lipid bilayers and membrane receptors: kinetic analysis of cholera toxin binding to a glycolipid receptor.

Authors:  Jonas Borch; Federico Torta; Stephen G Sligar; Peter Roepstorff
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Biosynthesis of the major brain gangliosides GD1a and GT1b.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Sturgill; Kazuhiro Aoki; Pablo H H Lopez; Daniel Colacurcio; Katarina Vajn; Ileana Lorenzini; Senka Majić; Won Ho Yang; Marija Heffer; Michael Tiemeyer; Jamey D Marth; Ronald L Schnaar
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.313

Review 3.  Characterization of protein-glycolipid recognition at the membrane bilayer.

Authors:  S V Evans; C Roger MacKenzie
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.137

4.  Saposin A mobilizes lipids from low cholesterol and high bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate-containing membranes: patient variant Saposin A lacks lipid extraction capacity.

Authors:  Silvia Locatelli-Hoops; Natascha Remmel; Ralf Klingenstein; Bernadette Breiden; Maksim Rossocha; Maike Schoeniger; Christine Koenigs; Wolfram Saenger; Konrad Sandhoff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Membrane protein assembly into Nanodiscs.

Authors:  Timothy H Bayburt; Stephen G Sligar
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Targeted analysis of ganglioside and sulfatide molecular species by LC/ESI-MS/MS with theoretically expanded multiple reaction monitoring.

Authors:  Kazutaka Ikeda; Takao Shimizu; Ryo Taguchi
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Phospholipid transfer between phosphatidylcholine-taurocholate mixed micelles.

Authors:  J W Nichols
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-05-31       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  NMR characterization of the interactions between lyso-GM1 aqueous micelles and amyloid beta.

Authors:  Maho Yagi-Utsumi; Tomoshi Kameda; Yoshiki Yamaguchi; Koichi Kato
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Screening Glycolipids Against Proteins in Vitro Using Picodiscs and Catch-and-Release Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jun Li; Xuxin Fan; Elena N Kitova; Chunxia Zou; Christopher W Cairo; Luiz Eugenio; Kenneth K S Ng; Zi Jian Xiong; Gilbert G Privé; John S Klassen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Imaging mass spectrometry detection of gangliosides species in the mouse brain following transient focal cerebral ischemia and long-term recovery.

Authors:  Shawn N Whitehead; Kenneth H N Chan; Sandhya Gangaraju; Jacqueline Slinn; Jianjun Li; Sheng T Hou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stable Picodisc Assemblies from Saposin Proteins and Branched Detergents.

Authors:  Kathleen W Kurgan; Bifan Chen; Kyle A Brown; Paulo Falco Cobra; Xinyu Ye; Ying Ge; Samuel H Gellman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Native Mass Spectrometry of Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  James E Keener; Guozhi Zhang; Michael T Marty
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Cell type and receptor identity regulate cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) internalization.

Authors:  Anirudh Sethi; Amberlyn M Wands; Marcel Mettlen; Soumya Krishnamurthy; Han Wu; Jennifer J Kohler
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.906

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.