Literature DB >> 29654529

Long-term functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstructions after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis.

Keisuke Okuno1, Masatoshi Nakagawa1, Kazuyuki Kojima2, Emi Kanemoto1, Kentaro Gokita1, Toshiro Tanioka1, Mikito Inokuchi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only a few reports discuss long-term functional outcomes and changes observed in patients over several years following a distal gastrectomy. We investigated long-term functional outcomes and changes after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy based on the analysis of postoperative conditions and endoscopic findings observed in patients.
METHODS: The study group comprised 159 patients who underwent Roux-en-Y reconstruction following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (R-Y group) between December 2008 and November 2012 and 78 patients who underwent Billroth I reconstruction (B-I group) between January 2002 and November 2012. To minimize bias between the two groups, propensity scores were calculated using a logistic regression model. The groups were compared with respect to postoperative conditions and endoscopic findings at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: The B-I group demonstrated more frequent heartburn than the R-Y group at 3 and 5 years postoperatively. No significant differences were found in terms of loss of body weight and food intake. Endoscopic findings showed significantly lesser residual food and remnant gastritis in the R-Y group at each annual postoperative follow-up. The incidence of bile reflux and reflux esophagitis in the B-I group gradually increased over the years and showed a significant difference at the culmination of the 5-year postoperative follow-up, compared to the R-Y group.
CONCLUSIONS: Roux-en-Y reconstruction was superior to Billroth I reconstruction in terms of frequency of occurrence of residual food, bile reflux, remnant gastritis, and reflux esophagitis in the long term. Differences between the two methods became more evident as the follow-up period lengthened.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy; Propensity-score matching analysis; Reflux esophagitis; Remnant gastritis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29654529     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6192-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mikito Inokuchi; Kazuyuki Kojima; Hiroyuki Yamada; Keiji Kato; Mikiko Hayashi; Kazuo Motoyama; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Gallbladder sludge and stone formation in relation to contractile function after gastrectomy. A prospective study.

Authors:  K Inoue; A Fuchigami; S Higashide; S Sumi; M Kogire; T Suzuki; T Tobe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Optimal Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer as assessed using the newly developed PGSAS-45 scale.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kawahira; Yasuhiro Kodera; Naoki Hiki; Masazumi Takahashi; Seiji Itoh; Norio Mitsumori; Yoshiyuki Kawashima; Tsutomu Namikawa; Takao Inada; Koji Nakada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Kim; Kyo Young Song; Cho Hyun Park; Young Joo Seo; Seung-Man Park; Jin-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.720

6.  Billroth 1 versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years.

Authors:  Souya Nunobe; Abuchi Okaro; Mitsuru Sasako; Makoto Saka; Takeo Fukagawa; Hitoshi Katai; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists.

Authors:  H Miwa; T Yokoyama; K Hori; T Sakagami; T Oshima; T Tomita; Y Fujiwara; H Saita; T Itou; H Ogawa; Y Nakamura; K Kishi; Y Murayama; E Hayashi; K Kobayashi; N Tano; K Matsushita; H Kawamoto; Y Sawada; A Ohkawa; E Arai; K Nagao; N Hamamoto; Y Sugiyasu; K Sugimoto; H Hara; M Tanimura; Y Honda; K Isozaki; S Noda; S Kubota; S Himeno
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kojima; Hiroyuki Yamada; Mikito Inokuchi; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Endoscopic evaluation of the remnant stomach after gastrectomy: proposal for a new classification.

Authors:  Makoto Kubo; Mitsuru Sasako; Takuji Gotoda; Hiroyuki Ono; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Daizo Saito; Takeshi Sano; Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis.

Authors:  Hidehiko Kitagami; Mamoru Morimoto; Masashi Nozawa; Kenichi Nakamura; Shinya Tanimura; Katsuhiko Murakawa; Yoshihiro Murakami; Kenji Kikuchi; Hajime Ushigome; Leo Sato; Minoru Yamamoto; Yasunobu Shimizu; Tetsushi Hayakawa; Moritsugu Tanaka; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling for Early Gastric Cancer-Preliminary Results of A North American Prospective Study.

Authors:  Carmen L Mueller; Robert Lisbona; Rafik Sorial; Aya Siblini; Lorenzo E Ferri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Functional Outcomes of Delta-Shaped Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masazumi Sakaguchi; Hisahiro Hosogi; Yukinari Tokoro; Daisuke Yagi; Norihiro Shimoike; Shin Akagawa; Seiichiro Kanaya
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Comparison of the gastric microbiome in Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yoshiro Imai; Sang-Woong Lee; Shoichi Sakaguchi; Nahoko Kato-Kogoe; Kohei Taniguchi; Michi Omori; Ryo Tanaka; Kotaro Honda; Wataru Osumi; Takashi Nakano; Takaaki Ueno; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Comparison of 5-year postoperative outcomes after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Results from a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yutaka Kimura; Jota Mikami; Makoto Yamasaki; Motohiro Hirao; Hiroshi Imamura; Junya Fujita; Atsushi Takeno; Jin Matsuyama; Kentaro Kishi; Takafumi Hirao; Hiroki Fukunaga; Koichi Demura; Yukinori Kurokawa; Shuji Takiguchi; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-09-15

5.  Optimal Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yongjia Yan; Daohan Wang; Yubiao Liu; Li Lu; Xi Wang; Zhicheng Zhao; Chuan Li; Jian Liu; Weidong Li; Weihua Fu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Risk Factors for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Lihu Gu; Kang Zhang; Zefeng Shen; Xianfa Wang; Hepan Zhu; Junhai Pan; Xin Zhong; Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo; Ping Chen
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 7.  Digestive tract reconstruction options after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Xiang Ma; Jing Yang; Jian-Ping Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-01-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.