Mitchell Boehnke1,2, David Mirsky3,4, Nicholas Stence3,4, Rachel M Stanley5,6, Daniel M Lindberg4,7. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, 12631 East 17th Ave., Mail Stop 8200, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Mitchell.boehnke@ucdenver.edu. 2. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. Mitchell.boehnke@ucdenver.edu. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, 12631 East 17th Ave., Mail Stop 8200, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 4. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. 7. The Kempe Center for the Prevention & Treatment of Child Abuse & Neglect, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating small patient cohorts have found a high, but variable, rate of occult head injury in children <2 years old with concern for physical abuse. The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends clinicians have a low threshold to obtain neuroimaging in these patients. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the prevalence of occult head injury in a large patient cohort with suspected physical abuse using similar selection criteria from previous studies. Additionally, we evaluated proposed risk factors for associations with occult head injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, secondary analysis of data collected by an observational study of 20 U.S. child abuse teams that evaluated children who underwent subspecialty evaluation for concern of abuse. We evaluated children <2 years old and excluded those with abnormal mental status, bulging fontanelle, seizure, respiratory arrest, underlying neurological condition, focal neurological deficit or scalp injury. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred forty-three subjects met inclusion criteria and 62.5% (714) underwent neuroimaging with either head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. We found an occult head injury prevalence of 19.7% (141). Subjects with emesis (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.8), macrocephaly (OR 8.5, 95% CI 3.7-20.2), and loss of consciousness (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.2-22.9) had higher odds of occult head injury. CONCLUSION: Our results show a high prevalence of occult head injury in patients <2 years old with suspected physical abuse. Our data support the ACR recommendation that clinicians should have a low threshold to perform neuroimaging in patients <2 years of age.
BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating small patient cohorts have found a high, but variable, rate of occult head injury in children <2 years old with concern for physical abuse. The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends clinicians have a low threshold to obtain neuroimaging in these patients. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the prevalence of occult head injury in a large patient cohort with suspected physical abuse using similar selection criteria from previous studies. Additionally, we evaluated proposed risk factors for associations with occult head injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, secondary analysis of data collected by an observational study of 20 U.S. child abuse teams that evaluated children who underwent subspecialty evaluation for concern of abuse. We evaluated children <2 years old and excluded those with abnormal mental status, bulging fontanelle, seizure, respiratory arrest, underlying neurological condition, focal neurological deficit or scalp injury. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred forty-three subjects met inclusion criteria and 62.5% (714) underwent neuroimaging with either head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. We found an occult head injury prevalence of 19.7% (141). Subjects with emesis (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.8), macrocephaly (OR 8.5, 95% CI 3.7-20.2), and loss of consciousness (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.2-22.9) had higher odds of occult head injury. CONCLUSION: Our results show a high prevalence of occult head injury in patients <2 years old with suspected physical abuse. Our data support the ACR recommendation that clinicians should have a low threshold to perform neuroimaging in patients <2 years of age.
Entities:
Keywords:
Abusive head trauma; Children; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuroimaging; Non-accidental trauma
Authors: Deborah Schonfeld; Silvia Bressan; Liviana Da Dalt; Mira N Henien; Jill A Winnett; Lise E Nigrovic Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Daniel M Lindberg; Emily A Blood; Kristine A Campbell; Antoinette L Laskey; Rachel P Berger Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-21
Authors: John D Milner; Davis A Hartnett; Steven F DeFroda; Brett A Slingsby; Zachary S Silber; Amy Z Blackburn; Alan H Daniels; Aristides I Cruz Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: M Katherine Henry; Samantha Schilling; Justine Shults; Chris Feudtner; Hannah Katcoff; Teniola I Egbe; Mitchell A Johnson; Savvas Andronikou; Joanne N Wood Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01