Melissa A Burns1,2, Zi Wei Liao1, Natsuko Yamagata1, Gayle P Pouliot1,2, Kristen E Stevenson3, Donna S Neuberg3, Aaron R Thorner4, Matthew Ducar4, Emily A Silverman1, Stephen P Hunger5, Mignon L Loh6, Stuart S Winter7, Kimberly P Dunsmore8, Brent Wood9, Meenakshi Devidas10, Marian H Harris11, Lewis B Silverman1,2, Stephen E Sallan1,2, Alejandro Gutierrez12,13. 1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 2. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 4. Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 5. Division of Oncology and the Center for Childhood Cancer Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. 6. Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. 7. Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA. 8. Division of Oncology, University of Virginia Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. 9. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, WA, USA. 10. Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. 11. Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 12. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. alejandro.gutierrez@childrens.harvard.edu. 13. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. alejandro.gutierrez@childrens.harvard.edu.
Abstract
The role of Hedgehog signaling in normal and malignant T-cell development is controversial. Recently, Hedgehog pathway mutations have been described in T-ALL, but whether mutational activation of Hedgehog signaling drives T-cell transformation is unknown, hindering the rationale for therapeutic intervention. Here, we show that Hedgehog pathway mutations predict chemotherapy resistance in human T-ALL, and drive oncogenic transformation in a zebrafish model of the disease. We found Hedgehog pathway mutations in 16% of 109 childhood T-ALL cases, most commonly affecting its negative regulator PTCH1. Hedgehog mutations were associated with resistance to induction chemotherapy (P = 0.009). Transduction of wild-type PTCH1 into PTCH1-mutant T-ALL cells induced apoptosis (P = 0.005), a phenotype that was reversed by downstream Hedgehog pathway activation (P = 0.007). Transduction of most mutant PTCH1, SUFU, and GLI alleles into mammalian cells induced aberrant regulation of Hedgehog signaling, indicating that these mutations are pathogenic. Using a CRISPR/Cas9 system for lineage-restricted gene disruption in transgenic zebrafish, we found that ptch1 mutations accelerated the onset of notch1-induced T-ALL (P = 0.0001), and pharmacologic Hedgehog pathway inhibition had therapeutic activity. Thus, Hedgehog-activating mutations are driver oncogenic alterations in high-risk T-ALL, providing a molecular rationale for targeted therapy in this disease.
The role of Hedgehog signaling in normal and malignant T-cell development is controversial. Recently, Hedgehog pathway mutations have been described in T-ALL, but whether mutational activation of Hedgehog signaling drives T-cell transformation is unknown, hindering the rationale for therapeutic intervention. Here, we show that Hedgehog pathway mutations predict chemotherapy resistance in human T-ALL, and drive oncogenic transformation in a zebrafish model of the disease. We found Hedgehog pathway mutations in 16% of 109 childhood T-ALL cases, most commonly affecting its negative regulator PTCH1. Hedgehog mutations were associated with resistance to induction chemotherapy (P = 0.009). Transduction of wild-type PTCH1 into PTCH1-mutant T-ALL cells induced apoptosis (P = 0.005), a phenotype that was reversed by downstream Hedgehog pathway activation (P = 0.007). Transduction of most mutant PTCH1, SUFU, and GLI alleles into mammalian cells induced aberrant regulation of Hedgehog signaling, indicating that these mutations are pathogenic. Using a CRISPR/Cas9 system for lineage-restricted gene disruption in transgenic zebrafish, we found that ptch1 mutations accelerated the onset of notch1-induced T-ALL (P = 0.0001), and pharmacologic Hedgehog pathway inhibition had therapeutic activity. Thus, Hedgehog-activating mutations are driver oncogenic alterations in high-risk T-ALL, providing a molecular rationale for targeted therapy in this disease.
The Hedgehog signal transduction pathway stimulates growth and proliferation in multiple cell types during embryonic development (1–3). Loss-of-function mutations of PTCH1, a negative regulator of Hedgehog signaling, result in aberrant Hedgehog pathway activation, and are driver oncogenic mutations in some tumor types, including basal cell carcinoma, medulloblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma (4–9). However, the role of Hedgehog signaling in normal and malignant T-cell development is controversial. In normal T-cell development, several lines of evidence suggest that Hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation or differentiation at multiple stages of T-cell development (10–14). However, the deletion of Smo in prethymic hematopoietic progenitors, which completely abolishes Hedgehog signaling, has no detectable effect on T-cell development (15, 16). Taken together, these findings suggest that acute changes in Hedgehog signaling can modulate T-cell output, but T-cell progenitors can adapt to chronic Hedgehog pathway inactivation, presumably due to compensation by alternative signals.Hedgehog pathway mutations have recently been described in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patient samples (17), and pharmacologic Hedgehog inhibitors demonstrate toxicity to T-ALL cases with autocrine Hedgehog activation (18). However, inactivating Hedgehog signaling has no effect on the onset or maintenance of Notch1-induced T-ALL (15), indicating that autocrine or paracrine Hedgehog signaling is not necessary for T-cell leukemogenesis. Further, despite the remarkable clinical activity of SMO inhibitors in tumors where Hedgehog-activating mutations are driver oncogenic lesions (19–22), clinical trials in tumor types with autocrine or paracrine Hedgehog activation have revealed little clinical benefit (23–26). Whether mutations that activate Hedgehog signaling drive T-cell transformation is unknown, hindering the rationale for therapeutic intervention.Here, we report a high frequency of Hedgehog pathway mutations in T-ALL cases that are resistant to induction chemotherapy, and we show that Hedgehog signaling represses apoptosis in PTCH1-mutant T-ALL cells. We further demonstrate that ptch1 mutations accelerate the onset of notch1-induced T-ALL in transgenic zebrafish, demonstrating that mutational Hedgehog pathway activation is a driver oncogenic lesion in the molecular pathogenesis of T-ALL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
T-ALL clinical specimens were collected from children with newly diagnosed T-ALL enrolled on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Study 05-001 (27), or Children’s Oncology Group Study AALL0434 (28) clinical trials, with informed consent and institutional review board approval in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.Complete methods are included in the SI Appendix.
RESULTS
Hedgehog pathway mutations in human T-ALL
Using targeted exon sequencing of T-ALL diagnostic clinical specimens (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2), we found 20 mutations of genes encoding canonical Hedgehog pathway components in 16% (n = 17 of 109) of patient samples analyzed (Figure 1a). With the exception of one case with low mutant allele frequencies (MAF) (<0.1), the MAFs (0.34–0.65) were consistent with monoallelic mutations in the bulk tumor population (Supplementary Table 1). Two of the T-ALL cases harbored monoallelic mutations of two Hedgehog pathway genes, PTCH1/GLI2 and GLI1/SUFU, and a third case harbored two distinct mutations of GLI3 at low allele frequencies. The remaining 14 T-ALL cases had a single heterozygous mutation of the pathway (Supplementary Table 1). PTCH1 was the single most commonly mutated gene, with 9 cases harboring heterozygous missense PTCH1 mutations (Figure 1b), all of which were validated by Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Figure 1a). Sequencing of remission specimens, which were available in 5 of the 9 cases with PTCH1 missense mutations, revealed that 3 of these mutations were absent at remission, indicating a somatic origin, whereas 2 were detected in the remission specimen (Supplementary Figure 1b). We lacked a non-hematopoietic germline specimen to distinguish whether these were germline mutations, possibly indicating an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome, or somatic mutations associated with clonal hematopoiesis.
Figure 1
Hedgehog pathway mutations in childhood T-ALL
(a) Hedgehog pathway genes mutated in T-ALL. (b) Amino acid alterations predicted to result from each of the mutations identified. Amino acid numbering based on the following transcripts: PTCH1, NM_000264 (mutations in black font), ENST00000375274.2 (red font). GLI1, NM_005269. GLI2, NM_005270 (black), ENST00000452319.1 (red). GLI3, NM_000168. SUFU, NM_016169. Note that mutations were annotated on the transcriptional variant predicted to be most significantly affected, with detailed annotation results shown in Supplementary Table 2. (c) Association of Hedgehog pathway mutations and resistance to induction chemotherapy, defined as ≥ 5% leukemic blasts in the bone marrow at end-induction by morphology (DFCI samples) or flow cytometric analysis (COG samples). Number of cases of persistent disease = 10; number of cases of successful induction = 96. A two-sided Fisher’s exact test was used to assess significance. (d) Analysis of cumulative incidence of relapse or induction failure in Hedgehog mutant (n = 17) or Hedgehog wild-type (n = 89) T-ALL patients. Note that induction deaths, which occurred in 2 Hedgehog wild-type cases, were defined as competing events in the cumulative incidence calculation. (e) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival in Hedgehog mutant (n = 17) or Hedgehog wild-type (n = 91) T-ALL patients. Note that all early deaths in Hedgehog-mutant T-ALL were caused by leukemic progression. A two-sided log rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to test for differences in survival between groups. (f) Summary of gene mutations identified in the T-ALL samples analyzed. “Persistent Disease ≥ 5%” indicates patients with induction failure or ≥ 5% end-induction minimal residual disease.
Hedgehog pathway mutations were associated with resistance to the initial induction cycle of intensive combination chemotherapy (Figure 1c), which suggests primary, or pre-existing, chemotherapy resistance. Hedgehog mutations were also associated with a trend towards an increased incidence of relapse or induction failure, which did not reach statistical significance (Figure 1d), but there was no difference in overall survival (Figure 1e). These findings suggest that Hedgehog-mutant T-ALL cases with a poor response to induction chemotherapy respond favorably to subsequent intensification of treatment, which is applied in response to high levels of residual leukemia. Hedgehog mutations were not significantly associated with other described biomarkers of early treatment failure, such as early T-cell precursor (ETP) phenotype or absence of biallelic TCRγ deletion (Supplementary Figure 2), suggesting that these markers identify largely non-overlapping groups of T-ALL cases at increased risk of early treatment failure. Hedgehog pathway mutations co-occurred with a number of oncogenic lesions typical of T-ALL, such as NOTCH1 and PRC2 mutations, and deletions of CDKN2A and TAL1 (Figure 1f and Supplementary Figure 3), although the incidence of these cooperating mutations was similar in Hedgehog-mutant versus wild-type T-ALL. These findings suggest that Hedgehog mutations can cooperate with a number of classical T-ALL oncogenic lesions in T-cell transformation.
Transduction of wild-type PTCH1 induces apoptosis in PTCH1-mutant T-ALL
To investigate the role of Hedgehog signaling in T-ALL, we first focused on its negative regulator PTCH1, because this was the most commonly mutated Hedgehog pathway gene in this cohort. Analysis of the PTCH1 locus in a panel of human T-ALL cell lines revealed that Jurkat cells harbored a heterozygous microdeletion of exon 2 (Figure 2a), associated with production of a mutant PTCH1 mRNA predicted to encode a p.Gly68fsX5 truncated protein product (Figure 2b). We confirmed that this PTCH1p.Gly68fsX5 mutant allele was unable to silence Hedgehog signaling, as assessed by mRNA expression of the canonical Hedgehog target Gli1, upon transduction into ASZ001 cells derived from a Ptch1 heterozygous knockout mouse (29, 30) (Supplementary Figure 4). In fact, expression of this mutant allele appeared to interfere with residual Ptch function in these cells. Thus, Jurkat T-ALL cells harbor a pathogenic PTCH1 mutation.
Figure 2
Aberrant hedgehog pathway activation is required for survival of PTCH1-mutant T-ALL cells
(a) Quantitative DNA PCR analysis of DNA copy number using independent primer pairs located within exon 2 of PTCH1 (NM_000264), as well as centromeric and telomeric primer pair controls (location shown on left), on genomic DNA from Jurkat T-ALL cells. (b) 5′RACE analysis of PTCH1 mRNA transcripts expressed in Jurkat T-ALL cells. (c–d) Jurkat cells were transduced with wild-type PTCH1 or EGFP control, and treated with DMSO control or 100nM SAG to activate the Hedgehog pathway downstream of PTCH1. Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analysis was performed to assess mRNA expression of PTCH1 (c) or GLI1 (d), a canonical reporter of Hedgehog pathway activity. Results were normalized to β-Actin. A two-sided Welch t-test was used for statistical analysis of PTCH1 mRNA overexpression (c), and an ANOVA with Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons was performed to assess differences in GLI1 mRNA expression (d). (e–f) Viability of the indicated T-ALL cells transduced with EGFP control or wild-type PTCH1, assessed 48 hours after selection in puromycin using trypan blue staining. A two-sided Welch t-test was used for statistical analysis. A Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust for multiple hypotheses testing (e). (g) Jurkat cells transduced with PTCH1 or EGFP control were harvested 48 hours after selection in puromycin and stained with PI for cell cycle analysis. A two-way ANOVA with Tukey adjustment was applied to assess differences in G1, S, and G2/M populations; p-values for each comparison in these three populations were not significant. (h) Caspase 3/7 activity in Jurkat cells transduced with PTCH1 versus EGFP control, and treated with 100 nM SAG or vehicle control (DMSO); results were normalized to DMSO-treated EGFP control. A two-sided Welch t-test with Bonferroni correction was applied for statistical analysis. (i) Relative MYCN mRNA expression (normalized to β-Actin control) was assessed by RT-PCR in Jurkat cells transduced with either EGFP or wild-type PTCH1, and treated with DMSO control or 100nM SAG to activate the Hedgehog pathway downstream of PTCH1. A two-sided Welch t-test with Bonferroni correction was used to assess significance. (j) Association of MYCN mRNA expression assessed using RNA sequencing analysis in 24 of the 109 patients in this study, with Hedgehog pathway mutations. A Wilcoxon sum-rank test was used to assess significance.
We then asked whether transducing wild-type PTCH1 inhibits Hedgehog signaling in PTCH1-mutant Jurkat cells. Transduction of wild-type PTCH1 downregulated Hedgehog signaling, an effect that was reversed by downstream Hedgehog pathway activation using SAG, a small molecule Smoothened agonist (Figure 2c–d). Transduction of PTCH1 impaired the viability of PTCH1-mutant Jurkat cells (Figure 2e), but had no toxicity to PTCH1 wild-type CCRF-CEM or DND41 T-ALL cells (Figure 2f). Importantly, the toxicity of PTCH1 transduction into PTCH1-mutant Jurkat cells was reversed by downstream Hedgehog pathway activation with SAG (Figure 2e), indicating on-target, Hedgehog-dependent toxicity. Cell cycle analysis revealed that transduction of wild-type PTCH1 induced formation of a large sub-G1 peak, suggesting induction of apoptosis, with little effect on the cell cycle distribution of live cells (Figure 2g). To confirm that PTCH1 transduction induced Hedgehog-dependent apoptosis in PTCH1-mutant T-ALL cells, we assessed effector caspase activity following transduction of PTCH1 or EGFP in Jurkat cells, alone or in combination with SAG treatment. This revealed that PTCH1 induced caspase activation, an effect that was reversed by downstream Hedgehog pathway activation using SAG (Figure 2h). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Hedgehog signaling represses apoptosis in PTCH1-mutant T-ALL.
The MYCN proto-oncogene is a transcriptional target of Hedgehog signaling in neuronal progenitors (31). MYCN is overexpressed in approximately 20% of human T-ALL via unknown mechanisms (32), and its overexpression drives T-cell transformation (33). Moreover, we have previously shown that overexpression of its paralog, MYC, represses mitochondrial apoptosis in T-ALL (34, 35). To test whether Hedgehog signaling regulates MYCN transcription in T-ALL, we transduced PTCH1-mutant Jurkat T-ALL cells with wild-type PTCH1 or EGFP control. We found that PTCH1 transduction downregulated MYCN mRNA expression, an effect that was rescued by downstream Hedgehog pathway activation (Figure 2i). Analysis of MYCN RNA expression in the subset of primary T-ALL patient samples on which RNA sequencing was available revealed that Hedgehog mutations were associated with increased MYCN expression (Figure 2j), but MYCN RNA expression was not associated with resistance to induction chemotherapy (P = 1.00 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test; data not shown). These findings indicate that MYCN is a transcriptional target of Hedgehog signaling in human T-ALL, but suggest that other Hedgehog targets may underlie chemotherapy resistance.
Most of the identified Hedgehog pathway mutations encode pathogenic alleles
Numerous missense mutations throughout the PTCH1 gene have been described in the cancer predisposition syndrome Gorlin syndrome (36, 37). While most of the PTCH1 mutations we identified in T-ALL were predicted to mutate evolutionarily conserved amino acid residues (Supplementary Figure 5), none of these are known to be pathogenic. To test whether the PTCH1 mutations identified are pathogenic, we transduced mutant alleles identified into the PTCH1-mutant T-ALL cell line Jurkat, and assessed their effects on leukemic cell viability and Hedgehog signaling in these cells. We found that 6 of the 7 mutant PTCH1 alleles tested had impaired growth-suppressive activity when compared to wild-type PTCH1 (Figure 3a), with a concordant impairment in their ability to suppress Hedgehog signaling, as assessed by GLI1 mRNA expression (Figure 3b). Transduction of wild-type or mutant PTCH1 alleles had no effect on the viability of PTCH1 wild-type DND41 cells (Supplementary Figure 6). Taken together, these data indicate that most of the PTCH1 mutations identified in T-ALL encode functionally impaired alleles.
Figure 3
Most Hedgehog pathway mutations encode pathogenic alleles
(a) Jurkat cells were transduced with EGFP control, wild-type PTCH1, or PTCH1 mutant alleles identified within our patient cohort, and viability was assessed following selection in puromycin on day 5 using trypan blue staining. Results were normalized to EGFP control. A two-sided, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s adjustment for multiple comparisons was used for statistical analysis. (b) Relative GLI1 mRNA expression (normalized to β-Actin control) was assessed in Jurkat cells transduced with EGFP, wild-type PTCH1, or mutant PTCH1 alleles. A one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s adjustment for multiple comparisons was used for statistical analysis. NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells were transfected with EGFP control, (c) wild-type SUFU or K460R mutant SUFU allele, (d) wild-type GLI1 or G274C mutant GLI1 allele, (e) wild-type GLI2 or the T286S mutant GLI2 allele, or (f) wild-type GLI3, or one of GLI3 mutant alleles (R292C, G1217W, R1537H) identified within our T-ALL patient cohort, and relative mRNA expression of mouse Gli1 (normalized to mouse Gapdh control) was assessed using RT-PCR. Results were normalized to EGFP control. A one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s adjustment for multiple comparisons was used for statistical analysis.
To test whether mutations of other Hedgehog pathway genes identified induce aberrant pathway activation, we turned to NIH 3T3 cells, a mouse cell line with low basal Hedgehog activity that is competent for Hedgehog pathway activation (38). SUFU encodes a negative regulator of Hedgehog signaling, and transduction of NIH 3T3 cells with wild-type SUFU further suppressed basal Hedgehog signaling in these cells (Figure 3c). By contrast, transduction of the SUFUK460R mutant led to a significant increase in Hedgehog pathway activity above that in basal conditions (Figure 3c), suggesting that this allele has dominant-negative activity and can interfere with function of the wild-type protein. To test the effect of wild-type or mutant GLI1 on Hedgehog pathway activity, we first confirmed that our RT-PCR assay for expression of endogenous mouseGli1 mRNA (the marker for Hedgehog pathway activation) did not cross-react with the humanGLI1 expression construct utilized (Supplementary Figure 7). Transduction of NIH 3T3 cells with the humanGLI1G274C mutant allele did not activate Hedgehog signaling beyond the degree of activation induced by wild-type GLI1 overexpression, suggesting that this mutation is not activating (Figure 3d). Similarly, transduction of the GLI2T286S mutant into NIH 3T3 cells did not activate the Hedgehog pathway beyond that induced by wild-type GLI2 overexpression (Figure 3e). By contrast, all three GLI3 mutant alleles identified (R292C, G1217W and R1537H) induced significantly more Hedgehog pathway activation than wild-type GLI3, indicating that expression of these mutations is sufficient to induce aberrant Hedgehog pathway activation (Figure 3f). Taken together, these findings indicate that most of the Hedgehog pathway mutations identified in our T-ALL patient cohort are pathogenic. Indeed, of the 15 T-ALL cases harboring Hedgehog pathway mutations that were tested, 12 harbored mutations that were clearly pathogenic. We confirmed that the association of Hedgehog mutations with resistance to induction chemotherapy remains statistically significant if this analysis is limited to cases with known pathway activating mutations (Supplementary Figure 8; P = 0.011).
ptch1 mutations accelerate the onset of notch1-induced T-ALL
If Hedgehog-activating mutations promote T-cell transformation in part via MYCN upregulation, we reasoned that this effect would be best detected in collaboration with an oncogenic lesion that promotes MYC-independent transformation. We thus turned to the zebrafish model, where notch1a promotes T-cell transformation without upregulating myc (39, 40). To generate a CRISPR/Cas9 system for lineage-restricted gene disruption, we first designed a panel of guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting exon 13 of zebrafishptch1, because mutation of this exon is known to induce aberrant Hedgehog pathway activation (41). As a control for CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA damage, we also designed gRNAs targeting the locus syntenic to the human safe-harbor AAVS1 locus, which is located within intron 1 of the ppp1r12c gene (42). To identify gRNAs that efficiently mutagenize each of these loci, individual gRNAs were co-injected with Cas9 mRNA into zebrafish embryos at the 1-cell stage, and cutting efficiency was assessed by next-generation sequencing of the target locus. This revealed gRNAs that induced insertion/deletion mutations in at least 30% of each target locus (Figure 4a). These gRNAs were then cloned into an expression vector in which the U6 promoter drives RNA polymerase III-mediated expression of the gRNA. Lineage-restricted gene disruption was achieved via a separate expression cassette within the same vector that drives expression of a Cas9-T2A-GFP self-cleaving protein under the control of the rag2 promoter (Figure 4b, top), which drives expression in immature T-cell progenitors.
Figure 4
Mutations of ptch1 accelerate the onset of notch1-induced T-ALL
(a) Guide RNAs targeting ptch1 or the zebrafish locus syntenic to the human aavs1 safe-harbor locus were co-injected with Cas9 mRNA into zebrafish embryos at the 1-cell stage, genomic DNA was harvested 48h later, and cutting efficiency was assessed by next-generation sequencing. Results are shown for the most efficient gRNAs targeting each locus, which were used in the subsequent generation of transgenic zebrafish. Top line indicates the reference sequence, and individual reads harboring insertion or deletion (In/Del) mutations are shown in decreasing order of abundance. The total fraction of reads with In/Del mutations is shown in parentheses. (b) Schema of experimental design. (c) Kaplan-Meier analysis of zebrafish injected with the CRISPR/Cas9 construct targeting ptch1 or aavs1 (safe harbor control), together with rag2-notch1a n=27; ptch1, n=26). A two-sided Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to assess differences in survival between these two groups. (d) Representative ptch1 (top panel) or aavs1 (control) (bottom panel);rag2- notch1a double transgenic zebrafish at 20 weeks of age. (e) H&E staining of sagittal cross-section (left) and muscle (right) from ptch1 (top) and wild-type (bottom) age-matched zebrafish. (f) Next-generation sequencing of the locus targeted by ptch1 gRNA in a ptch1-mutant rag2- notch1a double transgenic zebrafish. Note that ptch1 is transcribed from the strand complementary to the gRNA target sequence shown here.
To test whether ptch1 mutations accelerate the onset of notch1-induced T-ALL, we co-injected wild-type zebrafish embryos at the 1-cell stage with the CRISPR/Cas9 expression vector targeting either ptch1 or aavs1, together with a rag2 promoter-driven activated notch1a allele (Figure 4b). Zebrafish with successful transgene integration and expression were identified by thymic GFP fluorescence, and all fish demonstrating thymic GFP fluorescence by 4 weeks of age were screened for T-ALL onset by weekly fluorescence microscopy. Expression of the ptch1-targeting CRISPR/Cas9 cassette significantly accelerated the onset and increased the penetrance of notch1-induced T-ALL, with a median time to T-ALL onset of 13 weeks in ptch1 fish, versus 39 weeks in the aavs1 controls (P=0.0001; Figure 4c–d). Histologic analysis of leukemiczebrafish revealed diffuse infiltration of normal tissues by small cells with round to slightly irregular nuclear contours, homogeneous chromatin, and scant cytoplasm (Figure 4e), consistent with leukemic T-lymphoblasts. Next-generation sequencing of the gRNA target locus in a subset of T-ALL cases revealed the presence of dominant mutations, confirming effective mutagenesis of the intended locus and indicating a clonal origin of these leukemias (Figure 4f).To assess the transplantability of zebrafishptch1-mutant leukemias, T-ALL blasts were harvested from zebrafish with ptch1-mutant T-ALL, and injected into irradiated wild-type recipients (Figure 5a). We observed successful leukemic engraftment in 32 of 32 injected recipients, which rapidly progressed in all cases (Figure 5b), indicating that the aberrant growth and proliferation of these cells is cell-autonomous. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that mutational activation of Hedgehog signaling via disruption of its negative regulator ptch1 functions as an oncogenic driver in T-ALL.
Figure 5
Transplantability of ptch1-mutant T-ALL and therapeutic activity of cyclopamine
(a) Schema of experimental design. (b) A representative adult ptch1-mutant recipient fish shown at day 7 (top) and 14 (bottom) following transplantation with ptch1; rag2-notch1a T-ALL. All 32 transplanted ptch1-mutant zebrafish demonstrated similar leukemic engraftment and rapid disease progression. Following leukemic engraftment, fish were treated with 1μM cyclopamine or vehicle control (ethanol) for 14 days. (c) Representative zebrafish in cyclopamine-treated and vehicle control (ethanol) for ptch1-mutant (top panel) and aavs1-control zebrafish (bottom panel) at the indicated time points. (d) Leukemic burden was assessed by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), with MFI at day 14 normalized to day 0 for each individual fish. Of note, 5 ptch1-mutant fish from each group (vehicle and cyclopamine) met criteria for euthanasia due to radiation toxicity by day 14, and most others became ill soon thereafter, thus the study was terminated at this time point. A two-sided Welch t-test was used to assess differences among treatment groups. (Number of fish per group: ptch1-mutant recipient fish - Day 0, vehicle=10, cyclopamine=11; Day 14, vehicle=5, cyclopamine=5; aavs1-control recipient fish - Day 0, vehicle=9, cyclopamine=11; Day 14, vehicle=8, cyclopamine=9). (e) Cells from a primary T-ALL patient sample that harbored a p.T1106M PTCH1 mutation, which had been engrafted and expanded in immunodeficient mice, were treated with DMSO control, 10nM vismodegib, or 100nM SAG. After 48 hours, (top panel) relative GLI1 mRNA expression (to β-Actin control) and (bottom panel) viability using trypan blue staining were assessed. Results were normalized to DMSO control. Differences were assessed using a Welch t-test.
ptch1-mutant T-ALLs are responsive to Hedgehog pathway inhibition
We then asked whether pharmacologic Hedgehog pathway inhibition has in vivo therapeutic activity in ptch1-mutant T-ALL. Vismodegib is a potent and specific Smoothened inhibitor with clinical activity in Hedgehog-driven humancancers (19, 43), but this drug failed to inhibit zebrafish Smoothened, as evidenced by its inability to induce cyclopia in zebrafish embryos (data not shown). Thus, we leveraged the structurally unrelated Smoothened inhibitor cyclopamine, which effectively inhibits Hedgehog signaling in the zebrafish [(44) and data not shown]. T-ALL blasts were harvested from ptch1-mutant or aavs1-control fish, and transplanted into a cohort of irradiated recipients. After T-ALL engraftment, fish were treated with either cyclopamine or vehicle control. Assessment of tumor response by fluorescence microscopy after 2 weeks of treatment revealed tumor regression in most cyclopamine-treated ptch1-mutant zebrafish, versus marked tumor progression in vehicle controls (Figure 5c–d, top panels). By contrast, cyclopamine had no therapeutic activity against T-ALLs expressing the aavs1 control gRNA (Figure 5c–d, bottom panels), indicating that the effect of the ptch1-targeting gRNA on T-ALL is Hedgehog-dependent. Moreover, treatment of leukemic cells from patient T-ALL D15, which harbor a pathogenic PTCH1T1106M mutation, with the FDA-approved Smoothened inhibitor vismodegib revealed that vismodegib inhibits Hedgehog signaling and impairs viability in these cells (Figure 5e). Thus, pharmacologic Hedgehog pathway inhibition has therapeutic activity against ptch1-mutant T-ALL.
DISCUSSION
Despite improvements achieved through the intensification of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, front-line therapy for T-ALL fails in 15–20% of children and 50–70% of adults (45–48), and these patients face a very poor prognosis (49–51). To date, no targeted therapies have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in this disease, highlighting the urgent clinical need for novel effective therapeutic approaches. We have identified a high frequency of Hedgehog pathway mutations in T-ALL cases with primary resistance to induction chemotherapy, and have demonstrated that mutations that activate Hedgehog signaling function as driver oncogenic events in the molecular pathogenesis of T-ALL. Given the remarkable clinical benefit of SMO inhibitors in tumors in which Hedgehog-activating mutations are driver oncogenic alterations (19–22), our findings thus provide a compelling rationale for clinical trials testing Hedgehog pathway inhibitors in patients with PTCH1-mutant T-ALL.The 16% incidence of Hedgehog mutations we identified in childhood T-ALL is in line with 13% incidence reported by Dagklis and colleagues in a cohort of 67 cases of childhood and adult T-ALL (17). By contrast, a recent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) study revealed Hedgehog pathway mutations in only 4 of 264 T-ALL cases analyzed (33). One factor that likely contributed to this apparent discrepancy is the association of Hedgehog mutations with induction failure, whereas such cases appear to have been excluded from WGS analysis due to lack of a remission specimen with which to distinguish germline versus somatic variants. Additionally, accurately distinguishing missense substitutions that are pathogenic from those that are non-pathogenic passengers by informatics alone remains a major challenge, and all of the pathogenic Hedgehog mutations we identified were missense substitutions not previously known to be pathogenic. Thus, we speculate that strict algorithms for mutation calling, which are appropriately applied to WGS data to avoid the risk that the list of mutation calls will be dominated by non-pathogenic variants, may have missed pathogenic Hedgehog pathway mutations. These findings highlight the ability of functional genetics to complement genomic investigation of human disease.Independent validation of the association of Hedgehog pathway mutations with early treatment resistance will be important before this biomarker is incorporated into clinical decision-making. Nevertheless, this finding suggests that Hedgehog signaling may directly mediate chemotherapy resistance. In acute myeloid leukemia, Hedgehog pathway activation mediates chemotherapy resistance by inducing glucuronidation of nucleoside analogs (52). Induction of apoptosis resistance provides an additional potential mechanism linking Hedgehog pathway activation to chemotherapy resistance, because mitochondrial apoptosis resistance provides one cellular mechanism for induction of resistance to conventional chemotherapy [(53–55) and unpublished observations]. However, the fact that Hedgehog mutations did not predict inferior overall survival suggests that Hedgehog-mutant T-ALLs respond favorably to the intensification of therapy applied in reaction to a poor response to induction chemotherapy. The treatment intensification strategies differed between the two clinical trials on which patients in this study were treated. On DFCI 05-001, patients with ≥5% leukemic blasts in the bone marrow at end-induction were deemed to have failed front-line therapy and taken off-study. While subsequent treatment was at the discretion of the treating physician, most of these patients likely underwent intensive re-induction chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after myeloablative doses of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. By contrast, on COG AALL0434, patients with 1–25% leukemic blasts at end-induction remained on study, but most were eligible for randomization to additional intensification of therapy with Nelarabine. While we remain blinded to outcomes of this randomization, it will be of considerable interest to determine whether the addition of nelarabine or allogeneic stem cell transplantation improves outcomes for patients with Hedgehog-mutant T-ALL. Even so, Hedgehog pathway inhibitors have a much more favorable toxicity profile than conventional therapy for high-risk T-ALL (19, 23, 24). Given the clear clinical activity of these drugs in tumors driven by Hedgehog-activating mutations (19–22), our findings provide a compelling rationale for clinical trials testing whether combining Hedgehog pathway inhibitors with conventional chemotherapy will improve clinical outcomes for patients with high-risk, PTCH1-mutant T-ALL.
Authors: Stanley B Kaye; Louis Fehrenbacher; Robert Holloway; Amnon Amit; Beth Karlan; Brian Slomovitz; Paul Sabbatini; Ling Fu; Robert L Yauch; Ilsung Chang; Josina C Reddy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: John M Goldberg; Lewis B Silverman; Donna E Levy; Virginia Kimball Dalton; Richard D Gelber; Leslie Lehmann; Harvey J Cohen; Stephen E Sallan; Barbara L Asselin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thanh-Trang Vo; Jeremy Ryan; Ruben Carrasco; Donna Neuberg; Derrick J Rossi; Richard M Stone; Daniel J Deangelo; Mark G Frattini; Anthony Letai Journal: Cell Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Kirk D Robarge; Shirley A Brunton; Georgette M Castanedo; Yong Cui; Michael S Dina; Richard Goldsmith; Stephen E Gould; Oivin Guichert; Janet L Gunzner; Jason Halladay; Wei Jia; Cyrus Khojasteh; Michael F T Koehler; Karen Kotkow; Hank La; Rebecca L Lalonde; Kevin Lau; Leslie Lee; Derek Marshall; James C Marsters; Lesley J Murray; Changgeng Qian; Lee L Rubin; Laurent Salphati; Mark S Stanley; John H A Stibbard; Daniel P Sutherlin; Savita Ubhayaker; Shumei Wang; Susan Wong; Minli Xie Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: H Hahn; C Wicking; P G Zaphiropoulous; M R Gailani; S Shanley; A Chidambaram; I Vorechovsky; E Holmberg; A B Unden; S Gillies; K Negus; I Smyth; C Pressman; D J Leffell; B Gerrard; A M Goldstein; M Dean; R Toftgard; G Chenevix-Trench; B Wainwright; A E Bale Journal: Cell Date: 1996-06-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Adolfo A Ferrando; Donna S Neuberg; Jane Staunton; Mignon L Loh; Christine Huard; Susana C Raimondi; Fred G Behm; Ching Hon Pui; James R Downing; D Gary Gilliland; Eric S Lander; Todd R Golub; A Thomas Look Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: C Reynolds; J E Roderick; J L LaBelle; G Bird; R Mathieu; K Bodaar; D Colon; U Pyati; K E Stevenson; J Qi; M Harris; L B Silverman; S E Sallan; J E Bradner; D S Neuberg; A T Look; L D Walensky; M A Kelliher; A Gutierrez Journal: Leukemia Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Laura Hinze; Maren Pfirrmann; Salmaan Karim; James Degar; Connor McGuckin; Divya Vinjamur; Joshua Sacher; Kristen E Stevenson; Donna S Neuberg; Esteban Orellana; Martin Stanulla; Richard I Gregory; Daniel E Bauer; Florence F Wagner; Kimberly Stegmaier; Alejandro Gutierrez Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Anjali P Patni; M K Harishankar; Joel P Joseph; Bhuvanadas Sreeshma; Rama Jayaraj; Arikketh Devi Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Justine E Roderick; Kayleigh M Gallagher; Leonard C Murphy; Kevin W O'Connor; Katherine Tang; Boyao Zhang; Michael A Brehm; Dale L Greiner; Jun Yu; Lihua Julie Zhu; Michael R Green; Michelle A Kelliher Journal: Blood Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 25.476
Authors: Melissa A Burns; Andrew E Place; Kristen E Stevenson; Alejandro Gutiérrez; Suzanne Forrest; Yana Pikman; Lynda M Vrooman; Marian H Harris; Sarah K Hunt; Jane E O'Brien; Barbara L Asselin; Uma H Athale; Luis A Clavell; Peter D Cole; Lisa M Gennarini; Justine M Kahn; Kara M Kelly; Caroline Laverdiere; Jean-Marie Leclerc; Bruno Michon; Marshall A Schorin; Maria Luisa Sulis; Jennifer J G Welch; Donna S Neuberg; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 3.167