Literature DB >> 29653885

Who Should Be Investigated for Haematuria? Results of a Contemporary Prospective Observational Study of 3556 Patients.

Wei Shen Tan1, Andrew Feber2, Rachael Sarpong3, Pramit Khetrapal4, Simon Rodney5, Rumana Jalil3, Hugh Mostafid6, Joanne Cresswell7, James Hicks8, Abhay Rane9, Alastair Henderson10, Dawn Watson7, Jacob Cherian11, Norman Williams3, Chris Brew-Graves3, John D Kelly4.   

Abstract

There remains a lack of consensus among guideline relating to which patients require investigation for haematuria. We determined the incidence of urinary tract cancer in a prospective observational study of 3556 patients referred for investigation of haematuria across 40 hospitals between March 2016 and June 2017 (DETECT 1; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02676180) and the appropriateness of age at presentation in cases with visible (VH) and nonvisible (NVH) haematuria. The overall incidence of urinary tract cancer was 10.0% (bladder cancer 8.0%, renal parenchymal cancer 1.0%, upper tract transitional cell carcinoma 0.7%, and prostate cancer 0.3%). Patients with VH were more likely to have a diagnosis of urinary tract cancer compared with NVH patients (13.8% vs 3.1%). Older patients, male gender, and smoking history were independently associated with urinary tract cancer diagnosis. Of bladder cancers diagnosed following NVH, 59.4% were high-risk cancers, with 31.3% being muscle invasive. The incidence of cancer in VH patients <45 yr of age was 3.5% (n=7) and 1.0% (n=4) in NVH patients <60 yr old. Our results suggest that patients with VH should be investigated regardless of age. Although the risk of urinary tract cancer in NVH patients is low, clinically significant cancers are detected below the age threshold for referral for investigation. PATIENT
SUMMARY: This study highlights the requirement to investigate all patients with visible blood in the urine and an age threshold of ≥60 yr, as recommended in some guidelines, as the investigation of nonvisible blood in the urine will miss a significant number of urinary tract cancers. Patient preference is important, and evidence that patients are willing to submit to investigation should be considered in reaching a consensus recommendation for the investigation of haematuria. International consensus to guide that patients will benefit from investigation should be developed.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Bladder cancer; Haematuria; Incidence; Investigation; Renal cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29653885     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  William Tabayoyong; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  SBSN drives bladder cancer metastasis via EGFR/SRC/STAT3 signalling.

Authors:  Zhongqiu Zhou; Zhuojun Zhang; Han Chen; Wenhao Bao; Xiangqin Kuang; Ping Zhou; Zhiqing Gao; Difeng Li; Xiaoyi Xie; Chunxiao Yang; Xuhong Chen; Jinyuan Pan; Ruiming Tang; Zhengfu Feng; Lihuan Zhou; Lan Wang; Jianan Yang; Lili Jiang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 3.  The Investigation of Hematuria.

Authors:  Christian Bolenz; Bernd Schröppel; Andreas Eisenhardt; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Marc-Oliver Grimm
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Diagnostic utility of axial imaging in the evaluation of hematuria: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher J D Wallis; Rashid K Sayyid; Roni Manyevitch; Nathan Perlis; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Neil E Fleshner; Martha K Terris; Matthew E Nielsen; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A simplified nomogram to assess risk of bladder cancer in patients with a new diagnosis of microscopic hematuria.

Authors:  Richard S Matulewicz; Alfred Rademaker; Joshua J Meeks
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Mixed-methods approach to exploring patients' perspectives on the acceptability of a urinary biomarker test in replacing cystoscopy for bladder cancer surveillance.

Authors:  Wei Shen Tan; Chin Hai Teo; Delcos Chan; Malgorzata Heinrich; Andrew Feber; Rachael Sarpong; Jennifer Allan; Norman Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Chirk Jenn Ng; John D Kelly
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Development and validation of a haematuria cancer risk score to identify patients at risk of harbouring cancer.

Authors:  W S Tan; A Ahmad; A Feber; H Mostafid; J Cresswell; C D Fankhauser; S Waisbrod; T Hermanns; P Sasieni; J D Kelly
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Complete transperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in a single position for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and comparative outcomes.

Authors:  Chengwu Xiao; Yang Wang; Meimian Hua; Wei Zhang; Guanyu Ren; Bin Yang; Qing Yang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Exploring patients' experience and perception of being diagnosed with bladder cancer: a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Wei Shen Tan; Chin Hai Teo; Delcos Chan; Kar Mun Ang; Malgorzata Heinrich; Andrew Feber; Rachael Sarpong; Norman Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Chirk Jenn Ng; John Kelly
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations?

Authors:  Wei Shen Tan; Rachael Sarpong; Pramit Khetrapal; Simon Rodney; Hugh Mostafid; Joanne Cresswell; Dawn Watson; Abhay Rane; James Hicks; Giles Hellawell; Melissa Davies; Shalom J Srirangam; Louise Dawson; David Payne; Norman Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Andrew Feber; John D Kelly
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.