Literature DB >> 29653788

Shift in U.S. payer responsibility for the acute care of violent injuries after the Affordable Care Act: Implications for prevention.

Edouard Coupet1, David Karp2, Douglas J Wiebe3, M Kit Delgado3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Investment in violence prevention programs is hampered by lack of clearly identifiable stakeholders with a financial stake in prevention. We determined the total annual charges for the acute care of injuries from interpersonal violence and the shift in financial responsibility for these charges after the Medicaid expansion from the Affordable Care Act in 2014.
METHODS: We analyzed all emergency department (ED) visits from 2009 to 2014 with diagnosis codes for violent injury in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). We used sample weights to estimate total charges with adjusted generalized linear models to estimate charges for the 15% of ED visits with missing charge data. We then calculated the share attributable by payer and determined the difference in proportion by payer from 2013 to 2014.
RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2013, the uninsured accounted for 28.2-31.3% of annual charges for the acute care of violent injury, while Medicaid was responsible for a similar amount (29.0-31.0%). In 2014, there were $10.7 billion in total charges for violent injury. Medicaid assumed the greatest share, 39.8% (95% CI: 38.0-41.5%, $3.5-5.1 billion), while the uninsured accounted for 23.6% (95% CI: 22.2-24.9%, $2.0-3.0 billion), and Medicare accounted for 7.8% (95% CI: 7.7-8.0%, $0.7-1.0 billion).
CONCLUSION: After Medicaid expansion, taxpayers are now accountable for nearly half of the $10.7 billion in annual charges for the acute care of violent injury in the U.S. These findings highlight the benefit to state Medicaid programs of preventing interpersonal violence. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health services research; Injury prevention; Public health; Violence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29653788      PMCID: PMC6162187          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  35 in total

1.  The medical costs of gunshot injuries in the United States.

Authors:  P J Cook; B A Lawrence; J Ludwig; T R Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Medicaid's future: What Might ACA Repeal Mean?

Authors:  Sara Rosenbaum; Sara Rothenberg; Rachel Gunsalus; Sara Schmucker
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2017-01

Review 3.  The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion creates incentive for state Medicaid agencies to provide reimbursement for hospital-based violence intervention programmes.

Authors:  Kyle Fischer; Jonathan Purtle; Theodore Corbin
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Saving lives and saving money: hospital-based violence intervention is cost-effective.

Authors:  Catherine Juillard; Randi Smith; Nancy Anaya; Arturo Garcia; James G Kahn; Rochelle A Dicker
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Injury prevention activities in U.S. trauma centres: are we doing enough?

Authors:  Eileen M McDonald; Ellen J MacKenzie; Sandra D Teitelbaum; Anthony R Carlini; Harry Teter; Carl P Valenziano
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Recurrent violent injury: magnitude, risk factors, and opportunities for intervention from a statewide analysis.

Authors:  Elinore Kaufman; Kristin Rising; Douglas J Wiebe; David J Ebler; Marie L Crandall; M Kit Delgado
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  A decade of hospital-based violence intervention: Benefits and shortcomings.

Authors:  Catherine Juillard; Laya Cooperman; Isabel Allen; Romain Pirracchio; Terrell Henderson; Ruben Marquez; Julia Orellana; Michael Texada; Rochelle Ami Dicker
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Benefits of a hospital-based peer intervention program for violently injured youth.

Authors:  Daniel Shibru; Elaine Zahnd; Marla Becker; Nic Bekaert; Deane Calhoun; Gregory P Victorino
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Medical costs and productivity losses due to interpersonal and self-directed violence in the United States.

Authors:  Phaedra S Corso; James A Mercy; Thomas R Simon; Eric A Finkelstein; Ted R Miller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Violence prevention involvement among trauma surgeons: description and preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  M L Tellez; R C Mackersie
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1996-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  The actual, long-term cost of intentional injury care among a cohort of Maryland Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Zachary D W Dezman; Paul Thurman; Ian Stockwell
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.697

2.  Association of Medicaid Expansion With Access to Rehabilitative Care in Adult Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Cheryl K Zogg; John W Scott; David Metcalfe; Abbe R Gluck; Gregory D Curfman; Kimberly A Davis; Justin B Dimick; Adil H Haider
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.